saf wrote:
One down, one to go
Spoke to a very respected councilor the other night at a lodge meeting and apparently you are going to make advances to a female passenger next week
they are just waiting for her complaint
The sad thing is that if this did happen, you would see it as a kind of victory. The abuse of power wouldn't bother, you, because you think it doesn't involve you.
What part of **** Germany and the Holocaust didn't you understand.
Garry is right to say that this isn't about him. he was never going to kneel before od.
This is about YOU. Keir and the turkey need you to be subservient. They need to demonstrate their power to stop you lot getting out of control.
And by exercising their power in an unreasonable way, and taking draconian measures, they control you.
This is how it has always been.
Except the niggler in the woodpile is that Human Rights now comes into play.
The Act states "In particular, the Act makes it unlawful for any public body to act in a way which is incompatible with the Convention,
unless the wording of an Act of Parliament means they have no other choice."
This may be what the council is relying on, they will claim they have to enforce the CGSA, it's the only Act they've got to work to, and the HRA gives them an out.
Except what they do within their process is not stipulated by the Act. It's their interpretation of it. And they don't have to do any of what they do. It's their choice.
And they have deliberately chosen to ignore any discussion about Human Rights.
Well if the HRA was irrelevant authorities would be winning their cases hands down. But they aren't.
The sad thing is that the scumbag Keir will be off into the sunset by then. Not responsible for the decision he made to breach Human Rights. Except through legal suit of course. But that's a groundbreaking matter for later.
Then there's the council solicitors, who are clearly out of control. They'll avoid any penalty because they'll close ranks, the council and its taxpayers will foot the large bill and once again the Executive, Sue Bruce, and the political machine will refuse and fail to hold them to account.
Then they'll do it all again and some other scrote will have his rights breached. It may be you saf
So really it's one down and the rest of you to go.
BTW Don't be shy, tell us all who this "respected" councillor is who feels justified in abusing the system and his position to dig me out?
Too shy, then please tell him to bring it on. I know full well that I will become embroiled in this process. Because I am embarrassing the council and the turkey for their short-comings.
However, it just makes the problem bigger. Much bigger.
And, one political dig out you can explain, two becomes more than a co-incidence. I can't wait for this case to come to the Court of Session, me bringing a second would be a hoot.
Here's laughing at you saf. Feel your fear.
Login
Register
FAQ
