Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu May 07, 2026 4:45 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57371
Location: 1066 Country
Drivers’ demo over taxi cameras in Southampton

TAXI drivers angry at being forced to have “big brother” cameras in their cars that record footage and conversations were due to stage a demo today.

The drivers are set to circle the Civic Centre in Southampton at about 11am for half an hour.

The action comes after the city council vowed to appeal a court ruling in favour of taxi boss Keith May.

A district judge agreed that the CCTV, a compulsory licensing requirement, breaches the human right to privacy.

Trade union Unite’s cab section today backed the cabbies but condemned the council’s decision to appeal.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 6:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57371
Location: 1066 Country
Sussex wrote:
The drivers are set to circle the Civic Centre in Southampton at about 11am for half an hour.

That should do the trick. [-(

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 8:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 186
Location: Derbyshire
Surely the much feted 'Human rights' comes into play here.If they don't want it they shouldn't have to have it.

Simples!!!!

The council will just be waiting to catch a cabbie slagging them off and then bring down their sledgehammer powers on them.

_________________
'I wouldn't say I was the best in the business but I'm in the top one'


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed May 04, 2011 10:31 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Derby Ram wrote:
The council will just be waiting to catch a cabbie slagging them off and then bring down their sledgehammer powers on them.


I don't think the CCTV works like that. Unless something happens no one will ever see the footage.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2011 12:25 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 6:51 am
Posts: 104
grandad wrote:
Derby Ram wrote:
The council will just be waiting to catch a cabbie slagging them off and then bring down their sledgehammer powers on them.


I don't think the CCTV works like that. Unless something happens no one will ever see the footage.


Quite sure it's not above the council officers principles to have a mystery shopper promote inciting conversation with "Targeted" drivers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2011 3:32 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
In London the £700 + 'approved' systems don't record sound.

My £40 non approved one does though, and I think it's invaluable if you ever receive a complaint.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2011 7:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20868
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
Sussex wrote:
Drivers’ demo over taxi cameras in Southampton

TAXI drivers angry at being forced to have “big brother” cameras in their cars that record footage and conversations were due to stage a demo today.

The drivers are set to circle the Civic Centre in Southampton at about 11am for half an hour.

The action comes after the city council vowed to appeal a court ruling in favour of taxi boss Keith May.

A district judge agreed that the CCTV, a compulsory licensing requirement, breaches the human right to privacy.

Trade union Unite’s cab section today backed the cabbies but condemned the council’s decision to appeal.



That'll do nowt drive up the M3 in convoy at 30mph in the rush hour with news cameras watching that will bring the council to the negotiating table !

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: CCTV
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2011 9:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:57 pm
Posts: 395
Location: South Coast
Not long after these cameras were made compulsory in Southampton, a driver had his license revoked for verbally abusing some elderly lady passengers. It was posted on the BBC website and was at one time on the Souther Daily Echo site. The fottoage was shocking.

I had an incident recently where a passenger started to open the rear door, a passing van driver panicked, swerved and hit some scaffolding. There was ample room for him to have passed safely and I think CCTV footage would have helped me.

I'm on the fence on this one.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2011 10:55 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57371
Location: 1066 Country
I'm not on the fence.

I think drivers are silly not to have CCTV.

Saves lives and livelihoods.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2011 12:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
The ones that are against it probably have something to hide. :wink:

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2011 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 19, 2011 8:57 pm
Posts: 395
Location: South Coast
Sussex wrote:
I'm not on the fence.

I think drivers are silly not to have CCTV.

Saves lives and livelihoods.


To clarify, its the compulsory bit I'm on the fence about.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2011 1:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20868
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
The problem with cctv is that those in control of the footage can select which bits to use and consequently the whole truth doesn't always come out usually to the detriment of the driver

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2011 7:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu Jun 14, 2007 8:32 pm
Posts: 400
It should be left to the driver if they want CCTV in their cars. As for having something to hide by not wanting cameras in my car...not me, i just want my car to be my own little space with no intrusions or spies...except customers of course. Remember when CCTV first came about? It was for our safety and would help reduce crime. Well from my experience it only helps in evidence, it does not necessarily prevent crime. But now we know the real reason for CCTV in the last few years it is being used to fine people for minor infringements in other words its a money machine. Who is to say cameras in cabs wont be used in the same way in the future .Remember most cabs are used for private purposes aswell. The goverment and LAs have enough powers as it is and they abuse that power. My car is my work place it is where i have solitude and time to think, sometimes aloud.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu May 05, 2011 8:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57371
Location: 1066 Country
2 Jobs wrote:
Sussex wrote:
I'm not on the fence.

I think drivers are silly not to have CCTV.

Saves lives and livelihoods.


To clarify, its the compulsory bit I'm on the fence about.

The problem that arises if it's not compulsory is that the bad guys wont install it.

I'm 100% certain that piece of scum that abused those ladies in Southampton wouldn't have install it voluntarily.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri May 06, 2011 1:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 13, 2009 11:25 pm
Posts: 186
Location: Derbyshire
I certainly don't have anything to hide.It's just knowing what councils are like I happen to think it's an unwanted intrusion.
If I felt it was a requirement for my personal safety then I would make the investment.I don't however.
I do admit that although a hackney driver it is a complete rarity for me to hit the ranks these days so I really have no need for it.
Bottom line though is if councils make this mandatory THEY should pay for it.

_________________
'I wouldn't say I was the best in the business but I'm in the top one'


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 845 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group