Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 9:11 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Fewer checks on cabbies
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 9:42 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Fewer checks on cabbies

FEWER checks will soon be made on prospective taxi and private hire drivers in Lincolnshire.

The existing policy requires all applicants for a licence to undertake a Criminal Record Bureau (CRB) check to enhanced standard which details criminal convictions and lists people barred from working with children and vulnerable adults.

In March this year the CRB told councils that enhanced checks could only legally be required for drivers who transport children and vulnerable adults as part of a contract to or from schools or hospitals.

Aside from reducing the level of screening available to councils, some applicants may have to pay for two separate CRB checks, one standard and one enhanced.

North Kesteven District Council's licensing panel is to amend its taxi licensing policy accordingly when it meets next Wednesday to comply with the Government instructions.

source: http://www.thisislincolnshire.co.uk/

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 11:49 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Taxi Drivers : Standard or Enhanced?

Let’s first set out the basics and the legislative framework.

The Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (ROA), (Exceptions) Order 1975 lists the types of occupations, professions and positions for which you are legally entitled to request a Standard CRB check. Taxi Drivers’ Licences are included in this list and are therefore clearly entitled to a Standard level of check.

The question we often get asked is “Can I request an Enhanced CRB check on a Taxi Driver?” To answer this question you must consider other legislation, in particular the Police Act 1997 (Criminal Records) Regulations and the Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups (SVG) Act 2006.

The Police Act 1997 sets out a list of employments and positions which are entitled to an Enhanced CRB check. As it currently stands, the issuing of a licence in respect of either a Taxi Driver or Private Hire Vehicle driver is not listed. This means that it would be illegal to request an Enhanced CRB check for the sole purpose of issuing a licence to a Taxi or Private Hire Vehicle (PHV) driver.

Taxi and PHV drivers are not a specified position in the SVG Act 2006, however in certain circumstances some drivers will be carrying out regulated activity but only when they transport children or vulnerable adults to or from a regulated activity AND it is organised by the providers of the regulated activity or an organisation working on their behalf, e.g. a Local Authority school contract or NHS contract.

It is not regulated activity if a child/vulnerable adult hires a taxi in the street or by telephone privately.

For more information please see the Department for Transport’s “Taxi and PHV Licensing Best Practice Guidance of March 2010”.


http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/publicatio ... ?view=Html

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 12:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Oct 16, 2005 12:07 am
Posts: 2596
Location: Hampshire (HC)
Although I'm aware that the law appears to have been in place for a little while, am I alone in thinking this is a step backwards?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 3:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
A STANDARD CRB check:- "will provide information regarding

CONVICTIONS, CAUTIONS, REPRIMANDS and WARNINGS held on the

PNC. (police national computers)"

Is there really any more a council needs to (re) badge a driver?

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
cabbyman wrote:
Although I'm aware that the law appears to have been in place for a little while, am I alone in thinking this is a step backwards?

It is a massive step backwards, but in all fairness the CRB folks are merely confirming the law as it was written.

What we need is a change of law to make it mandatory for licensed taxi/PH drivers, and proper guidance from gov as to exactly what is, or who is, 'fit and proper'.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 6:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
jimbo wrote:
Is there really any more a council needs to (re) badge a driver?

In the vast majority of cases no.

However if an alleged rapist, who has been interviewed a number of times by the police, then maybe councils should see that info to allow them to make an informed judgement as to the fitness of an applicant.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 6:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 3:49 pm
Posts: 1331
Location: Midlands
jimbo wrote:
A STANDARD CRB check:- "will provide information regarding

CONVICTIONS, CAUTIONS, REPRIMANDS and WARNINGS held on the

PNC. (police national computers)"

Is there really any more a council needs to (re) badge a driver?


So why cant we just get a PNC check done at the local Police Station for £11 and done within 4 days?

_________________
Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience.
Image
Believe me, don't get Mercury X2


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
Sussex wrote:
jimbo wrote:
Is there really any more a council needs to (re) badge a driver?

In the vast majority of cases no.

However if an alleged rapist, who has been interviewed a number of times by the police, then maybe councils should see that info to allow them to make an informed judgement as to the fitness of an applicant.


So a decision on a drivers fitness should be made on unfounded allegations?

I thought that a cornerstone of British Justice was innocent until PROVEN guilty.

Does anyone out there really think that a person who has been accused of a crime such as sexual assault, but not charged, should subsequently be considered not "fit and proper" to drive a taxi?

Ever been accused of something you did not do? I have.

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 12:04 pm
Posts: 2859
Location: SCOTLAND
Quote:
What we need is a change of law to make it mandatory for licensed taxi/PH drivers, and proper guidance from gov as to exactly what is, or who is, 'fit and proper'.



Agree %100 , clear and accurate guidance is needed


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 8:06 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
Stationtone wrote:
Quote:
What we need is a change of law to make it mandatory for licensed taxi/PH drivers, and proper guidance from gov as to exactly what is, or who is, 'fit and proper'.



Agree %100 , clear and accurate guidance is needed



Define "clear and accurate" to a 100% absolute.

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Jun 27, 2011 10:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
jimbo wrote:
Define "clear and accurate" to a 100% absolute.

A start would be the minimum amount of time since a specific conviction until anyone can apply for a license.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 8:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
Sussex wrote:
jimbo wrote:
Define "clear and accurate" to a 100% absolute.

A start would be the minimum amount of time since a specific conviction until anyone can apply for a license.


The real problem lies with those who have not been apprehended for their misdeeds.

A set of guidelines already exists as to minimum times, doesn't it?

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Jun 28, 2011 5:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
jimbo wrote:
A set of guidelines already exists as to minimum times, doesn't it?

Indeed, but how many councils adhere to them?

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 857 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group