Gateshead Angel wrote:
Again we see the double standards.
Someone posts under their username and the administration replies using a persons real name.
Surely if anonimity were being respected only the username would be used.
"we know who you are but your not allowed to know who we are" seems to be the motto of this sites administration.
Didn't you bother reading any of his posts?
He said, inter alia:
At least you know where my manor is and who I am, pity we cant same the same about you and your manor.
I don't think ***** has ever tried to cover up his identity, and his username is just that.
If he had objected to the use of his real name then presumably he would have said, instead we have you doing it for him, but presumably not at his behest.
The trouble with you and others is that you've posted under so many different names which are obviously the same person (and usually you don't bother even trying to hide the fact that it's you) and sometimes you want to keep your ID secret, and at other times it doesn't bother you.
So can't you understand why we are confused?
As regards your present ID, I noticed that others used your real name, and you never objected, so I used it as well, since it makes it more obvious who the reply is directed to, and makes it seem a bit more civil as well.
If anyone wants their ID protected then I'm the first to abide by this, the problem with you is that you don't know what you want, so you shouldn't expect others to either.
Isn't it YOU that's displaying the double standards? When you thought the knew the identity of Captain Cab it didn't take you long to be singing it from the rooftops.
Same with Nidge, when he THOUGHT he knew the identity of a poster he was like the playground drug dealer who had found out the identity of the person who had 'grassed to teacher'.
But if Nidge is deluding himself in his state of blissful ignorance then who are we to object
Typical union bully boy double standards from you two methinks
