Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Dec 23, 2025 5:30 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 9:52 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 56826
Location: 1066 Country
Yorkie wrote:
NOW i HAVE HIT A RAW NERVE AND i AM SORRY FOR THAT i DID NOT ACTUALLY BELIEVE HE HAD YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS.

Nigel isn't bright enough to get his own name and address right, let alone others.

That aside has anyone answered the question as to why Nigel wanted to gain confidential information? :-k

I think the site is best rid of him.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 1:09 pm 
Sussex wrote:
MR T wrote:
Don"t you mean (only) if they agree with your own views. MR T.

Well that coming from someone who hasn't ever expressed a view of note, is slightly bizarre. :-k


Sussex. As long as you see me as bizarre I will be a happy man , (a view of note!!!!) I take is something you agree with .

You/they, say the rules were broken , then you say they weren't,
You say in your view he INTENDED to break them,

This to me lookes like (A LYNCH MOB)....love MR T. 8) 8) 8) 8)


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 1:37 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Sep 20, 2003 9:30 pm
Posts: 990
Location: The Global Market
Will miss his radical views.

Won't miss having to look at his poxy mugshot every post though.

Still for a few quid TTF2 could be up and running again.

_________________
A member of the Hire or Reward Industry


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 4:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
MR T wrote:
TDO wrote:
The site has to adhere to several legal and ethical obligations.

The odd statement of fact may be removed, either for confidentiality reasons or to protect against a defamation action, but opinions are not censored.



Don"t you mean (only) if they agree with your own views. MR T.



For example?

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Feb 13, 2005 7:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37473
Location: Wayneistan
I very often feel that one unfortunate side effect of this site is that people are giving free education lessons to the ignorant.

Captain cab

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 3:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
Eric the viking wrote:
Top man Captain, however when people rip others off name and shame is what is needed to prevent other unsuspecting dudes to have the same thing done to them, that is life pal :mrgreen:


I agree Mr Viking.... Now give us an example of name and shame. And don't pontificate or I'll come down on u like a ton of bricks.

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 5:08 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
MR T wrote:
Sussex wrote:
MR T wrote:
Don"t you mean (only) if they agree with your own views. MR T.

Well that coming from someone who hasn't ever expressed a view of note, is slightly bizarre. :-k


Sussex. As long as you see me as bizarre I will be a happy man , (a view of note!!!!) I take is something you agree with .

You/they, say the rules were broken , then you say they weren't,
You say in your view he INTENDED to break them,

This to me lookes like (A LYNCH MOB)....love MR T. 8) 8) 8) 8)


When you wear blinkers as you do it is understandable that you only see what you wan't to see. As from past experiance it has become patently obvious by those of us that have followed your ramblings over the last few weeks, that when it comes to down to producing the goods you are a total failure.

It may be convenient for you to [edited by admin] off and dissapear for two weeks but your wayword ramblings are not forgotten. We are still waiting for you to produce the goods from Mr Damien Edwards in regard to your unqualified statement regarding Liverpool councils Taxi numbers.

I said then that you wouldn't produce the goods, yet u come back on here without a bye your leave as though nothing has changed.

There are a great many members on this site who are respected. They don't pontificate they get on with the job in hand but you sir are an azzhole, you make untrue statements and expect others to believe they are true. It's a good job there are people like me to unmask fraudsters like you.

JD


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Feb 14, 2005 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
DAP wrote:
I always find it worrying when someones views are rejected just because they do not agree with yours. Censorship is a valuable tool but dangerous when used too often or for the wrong reasons.


Are you talking in general terms or alluding to something on here? If the latter, perhaps you could provide an example.



Quote:
What I have seen over the few months I have been 'tuned' in is the degeneration of healthy debate to a offensive slanging match between a small minority of members, with TDO joining in. Accusations and statements cannot be made without evidence to substantiate them otherwise we would all be free to say anything we wanted without being checked. Draw a line under recent events and lets get back to proper debates.


Hmm, another one who seem to think that TDO shouldn't answer back. If you read my posts you'll see that all I'm trying to do is do what you advocate should be done in the second half of your paragraph, so what am I doing wrong?

The problem is that there all kinds of 'accusations and statements' being made 'without evidence to substantiate them', with the intention being merely to cause trouble and discredit the site. When they are challenged to provide examples, none are provided.

The fundamental problem that these people have is that they more the spout such nonsense, the more the site's free speech credentials are underlined, so they are in effect destroying their own case. Any objective reader will easily see through them. :D

So keep it up lads :lol:

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:15 am 
JD wrote:
MR T wrote:
Sussex wrote:
MR T wrote:
Don"t you mean (only) if they agree with your own views. MR T.

Well that coming from someone who hasn't ever expressed a view of note, is slightly bizarre. :-k


Sussex. As long as you see me as bizarre I will be a happy man , (a view of note!!!!) I take is something you agree with .

You/they, say the rules were broken , then you say they weren't,
You say in your view he INTENDED to break them,

This to me lookes like (A LYNCH MOB)....love MR T. 8) 8) 8) 8)


When you wear blinkers as you do it is understandable that you only see what you wan't to see. As from past experiance it has become patently obvious by those of us that have followed your ramblings over the last few weeks, that when it comes to down to producing the goods you are a total failure.

It may be convenient for you to [edited by admin] off and dissapear for two weeks but your wayword ramblings are not forgotten. We are still waiting for you to produce the goods from Mr Damien Edwards in regard to your unqualified statement regarding Liverpool councils Taxi numbers.

I said then that you wouldn't produce the goods, yet u come back on here without a bye your leave as though nothing has changed.

There are a great many members on this site who are respected. They don't pontificate they get on with the job in hand but you sir are an azzhole, you make untrue statements and expect others to believe they are true. It's a good job there are people like me to unmask fraudsters like you.

For god's sake man(grow up) and leave the scotch bottle alone, You are a nasty piece of work at the best of times ,I have no desire to communicate with you,In my humble opinion you are a foulmouthed self-opiniated bully,you might think you are special but you are not,You are simply a pain the taxi trade have to put up with ..........MR T


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:15 am 
JD wrote:
MR T wrote:
Sussex wrote:
MR T wrote:
Don"t you mean (only) if they agree with your own views. MR T.

Well that coming from someone who hasn't ever expressed a view of note, is slightly bizarre. :-k


Sussex. As long as you see me as bizarre I will be a happy man , (a view of note!!!!) I take is something you agree with .

You/they, say the rules were broken , then you say they weren't,
You say in your view he INTENDED to break them,

This to me lookes like (A LYNCH MOB)....love MR T. 8) 8) 8) 8)


When you wear blinkers as you do it is understandable that you only see what you wan't to see. As from past experiance it has become patently obvious by those of us that have followed your ramblings over the last few weeks, that when it comes to down to producing the goods you are a total failure.

It may be convenient for you to [edited by admin] off and dissapear for two weeks but your wayword ramblings are not forgotten. We are still waiting for you to produce the goods from Mr Damien Edwards in regard to your unqualified statement regarding Liverpool councils Taxi numbers.

I said then that you wouldn't produce the goods, yet u come back on here without a bye your leave as though nothing has changed.

There are a great many members on this site who are respected. They don't pontificate they get on with the job in hand but you sir are an azzhole, you make untrue statements and expect others to believe they are true. It's a good job there are people like me to unmask fraudsters like you.

For god's sake man(grow up) and leave the scotch bottle alone, You are a nasty piece of work at the best of times ,I have no desire to communicate with you,In my humble opinion you are a foulmouthed self-opiniated bully,you might think you are special but you are not,You are simply a pain the taxi trade have to put up with ..........MR T


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:16 am 
JD wrote:
MR T wrote:
Sussex wrote:
MR T wrote:
Don"t you mean (only) if they agree with your own views. MR T.

Well that coming from someone who hasn't ever expressed a view of note, is slightly bizarre. :-k


Sussex. As long as you see me as bizarre I will be a happy man , (a view of note!!!!) I take is something you agree with .

You/they, say the rules were broken , then you say they weren't,
You say in your view he INTENDED to break them,

This to me lookes like (A LYNCH MOB)....love MR T. 8) 8) 8) 8)


When you wear blinkers as you do it is understandable that you only see what you wan't to see. As from past experiance it has become patently obvious by those of us that have followed your ramblings over the last few weeks, that when it comes to down to producing the goods you are a total failure.

It may be convenient for you to [edited by admin] off and dissapear for two weeks but your wayword ramblings are not forgotten. We are still waiting for you to produce the goods from Mr Damien Edwards in regard to your unqualified statement regarding Liverpool councils Taxi numbers.

I said then that you wouldn't produce the goods, yet u come back on here without a bye your leave as though nothing has changed.

There are a great many members on this site who are respected. They don't pontificate they get on with the job in hand but you sir are an azzhole, you make untrue statements and expect others to believe they are true. It's a good job there are people like me to unmask fraudsters like you.

For god's sake man(grow up) and leave the scotch bottle alone, You are a nasty piece of work at the best of times ,I have no desire to communicate with you,In my humble opinion you are a foulmouthed self-opiniated bully,you might think you are special but you are not,You are simply a pain the taxi trade have to put up with ..........MR T


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Feb 15, 2005 12:21 am 
JD wrote:
MR T wrote:
Sussex wrote:
MR T wrote:
Don"t you mean (only) if they agree with your own views. MR T.

Well that coming from someone who hasn't ever expressed a view of note, is slightly bizarre. :-k


Sussex. As long as you see me as bizarre I will be a happy man , (a view of note!!!!) I take is something you agree with .

You/they, say the rules were broken , then you say they weren't,
You say in your view he INTENDED to break them,

This to me lookes like (A LYNCH MOB)....love MR T. 8) 8) 8) 8)


When you wear blinkers as you do it is understandable that you only see what you wan't to see. As from past experiance it has become patently obvious by those of us that have followed your ramblings over the last few weeks, that when it comes to down to producing the goods you are a total failure.

It may be convenient for you to [edited by admin] off and dissapear for two weeks but your wayword ramblings are not forgotten. We are still waiting for you to produce the goods from Mr Damien Edwards in regard to your unqualified statement regarding Liverpool councils Taxi numbers.

I said then that you wouldn't produce the goods, yet u come back on here without a bye your leave as though nothing has changed.

There are a great many members on this site who are respected. They don't pontificate they get on with the job in hand but you sir are an azzhole, you make untrue statements and expect others to believe they are true. It's a good job there are people like me to unmask fraudsters like you.

For god's sake man grow up and leave the scotch bottle alone, You are a nasty piece of work at the best of times ,I have no desire to communicate with you,In my humble opinion you are a foulmouthed self-opiniated bully,you might think you are special but you are not,You are simply a pain the taxi trade have to put up with ..........MR T


Top
  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic This topic is locked, you cannot edit posts or make further replies.  [ 42 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group