ALI T wrote:
so when we gonna see this document before parliment.
i mean surely you and mr anderson(matrix voice) and mr i balllsed up the olympics transport.
do know that it would require a change in legislation,in fact you admitted that you were told as much.
so why do you pass it to someone in the council

The desire to change the legislation has to come from the Trade too the council and then on to the Government, i have been told from the top that if the desire comes from below, the government will give serious consideration to changing the CGSA, at the moment the trade and council are covering all options including my idea, everything is up for debate, a consultation process concerning the future of the Glasgow and Edinburgh trades is taking place and one thing all parties agree is that the status quo is wide open to abuse, as you know, the one thing that i know for sure is that de-restriction is out of the question, it's not going to happen.
The process is covering way's to restrict through changes to the cgsa the phc market, in retrospect a mistake made by the tories in the early 80s, how they do it is the problem, i believe my way is the solution for BOTH trade's
Restriction through cost is the solution
The document details how we can do this fairly for BOTH trades but yes we need a change in legislation, Captain cab gave me his view (not in the document) on a change that can be made to the CGSA that would allow LA's to restrict through cost
Hey it's a case of wouldn't you like to know
