Sussex wrote:
Isn't it exactly the same as the problems Cgull had, where the T&G conspired to keep other 100% HCs (including Cgull) out of Brighton Station?

What the [edited by admin] a 100% HC, Sussex??
Like I said it would be the straw that broke the camels back and not the only contributing factor.
The policy is simple, a HC should have the right to work throughout the borough in which it is licensed without having to pay extra to work area's where the public require their services.
Other "excuses" were offered by Brighton, as I believe it was the will of the membership, however certain union policies must be followed and this without question is one of them.
I think you are wrong, the union want free access on land that is kept by public subscription i.e adopted land.
Glasgow Airport is not kept by public subsctription nor adopted land but wholy owned by a public company.
dont think you will understand all that but otheres will.