Taxi Driver Online

So you mean that because JD doesn't include the values of Gateshead saloon plates on his list that you have to try and flush him out and make sure the whole world knows his personal details?

Unbelievable!

And so so sad

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk

ALL members's details are confidential if they want them to be.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk

Hang on a minute TDO, I only mentioned Gateshead as its the only council of which I have first hand knowledge, but during the debate on the issue many more people contributed that even though their area had deregulated, as the council had insisted of WAVs the saloon plates had retained their value. It was therefore the values of these plates that I thought should be included to show the true value of the "plates" accross the country, just because I only mentioned one area didn't mean that I only wanted that area included.

May I also advise you that I took no part in what Nidge was doing, he is a person in his own right and to suggest that I would use our friendship to influence him to conduct such an investigation on my behalf is what is unbelievable, think back and you will find that my freind has held such investigations before, maybe last time he got it wrong but through banning him your admitting that on this occasion he got it right.

And that alone is very worrying indeed.

B. Lucky

yes unfortunatly nigel has published criminal checks on here, and details of confidential meetings he should have been in check b4 and given the guidelines.

I am sorry t old enemy has gone!

What IS very worrying is that YOU are unconcerned about personal details being made public, when you yourself complain about the very same thing and told us that you in the past had property damaged as a result of this.

Nidge's intentions seemed fairly clear, but you too obviously hope that some harm will come to the 'outed' person as a result of any disclosures.

Personally I don't like malicious bully boys and witchunts, especially given your hypocrisy.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk

OK, Gateshead and any other area with partial de-limitation, as outlined on the document.

Please recall that you said:

it is because of this point that Nidge decidsed to investigate who this person was, after all we don't really know who anyone is do we.

Ignoring the double standards implicit in your latter comment in that YOU don't want people to know who you are, the above statement seems a pretty clear endorsement of what Nidge was doing - the word WE is the giveaway.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk

Yet again not so.

If I were to start posting using a different name, I would be recognised very quickly, indeed people speaking out get accused of being me anyway, but you don't get yourself into that do you.

You imply that it is I who bully, quite wrong, my viewpoint gets picked on more than any other member, you are therefore wrong to suggest that you or any other member have been bullied by me, indeed it is more likely that I have been subjected to the bullying.

What Nidge did or didn't do, is of no concern to me, the decision you made was up to you, I have no further comment on the issue other than to state that any information published about a member which could have caused any form of damage cannot be allowed to remain, however to ban a member for whatever reason is against what I understood was the principles of this site, but you made everyone "register" recently so your principles are therefore not worth a toss.

JD's personal information has nothing to do with his on-site activities, however when he contacts LA's to obtain information on behalf of the membership of this site he runs the risk of being identified, even so if I had the benefit of knowing what Nidge intended to do with the information then I would have advised him against it, I think he felt goaded into it by other prominent members who claimed he'd struggle to get his own details right. He was obviously correct with his latest "outing" otherwise he wouldn't have been banned so quickly.

Its also worthy of note that the admin have "locked" the thread calling for Nidge's return, maybe thats because they aren't interested in what the members want, I won't start another thread on the subject, but I bet someone will.

No you would never pose as anyone else

What I mean by bullying is a bit more than just debating the issues on here as you know, but then again if I even say anything then I'm in the wrong according to some.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk

If Nidge wishes to re-enter the wonderful world of Taxi Driver Online then he is now free to do so, having been un-sinbinned.

This site, both on and off line, receives large amounts of information from people who wish to remain anon. Therefore I believe that people's identity should be between them, and whoever they wish to know it. It shouldn't be open season on anyone, just because we differ in views.

Let's all share as much information as possible, yes occasionally have a ruck, but if someone wishes to stay anon, then we should all respect that.

Because it would really get boring for all of us without our regular fix of Taxi Driver Online.

Alex

_________________
ʎɐqǝ uo pɹɐoqʎǝʞ ɐ ʎnq ı ǝɯıʇ ʇsɐן ǝɥʇ sı sıɥʇ

Simply the best taxi forum in the whole wide world. www.taxi-driver.co.uk

What's requiring registration got to do with it, and if you say that a slight change in direction makes the site's principle not worth a toss, then what does that say about you and TTF2?

Registration was made mandatory to alleviate the problem of people using open access to the forum to make trouble, and also to make it easier to follow the thread, since some people didn't even type in a pseudonym.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk

I REPEAT, nothing done on TDO's behalf has anything to do with forum members!!

If a reporter sought information on behalf of his paper, would it be accurate to say that he was obtaining it on behalf of the correspondents to the Letters to the Editor page? Of course not!

I know no more about JD than I know about 99% of the contributors to the site, so I don't know whether what Nidge said was accurate.

But the intent was obvious.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk

Must have been locked in anticipation of his return

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk

I know you live in a peter pan world and make thinks up as you go along so another fabrication from the man from Gateshead is par for the course.

However, I'm intrigued at your latest childish outburst regarding me, LA's and the membership of this site, so the floor is yours, you can enlighten TDO and the rest of the congregation by informing them and me which LA's I contacted and said I represent TDO?

You have a big mouth for one so insignificant but as all big mouths when it comes to producing the goods you’re all [edited by admin] and wind. I know it’s common knowledge in Gateshead that your fast Tan venture fell flat on its face but surely you can find something constructive to do with your time instead of acting and behaving like a five year old child.

JD

JD is that right?
i HAVE SPENT A FEW DAYS THERE AND HEARD LOTS ABOUT HIM BUT THE [edited by admin] DID NOT TELL ME THAT!

Jesus so the extension is complete and the cars must go back?

thought there was a re launch of new products!

kin ell poor Mick.

What exactly did Nige say?
and if you dont know its acurate why bar him,

afrter all Sussex has been blowing information tonight and that information was inacurate