Sussex Man wrote:
My point is not whether you need an extra 2000 or not, but where you get the drivers from.
Say you have an annual survey, as you mentioned recently. As the KOL takes 3 years (approx), you aren't going to meet that demand for the extra, for at least those three years.
Then what happens if the survey says you have more than enough. Do you stop the KOL schools, do you stop the PCO passing drivers out?
Would you make the KOL harder if no un-met demand, and easier if there is un-met demand. What about those drivers near the end, will there return dates get longer, even though they are getting better at the KOL.
How will they assess the Yellow Badge areas? As the Green boys can pick up there, how will they know who is meeting that demand i.e. what licenses will they issue to meet the suburbs demand, more green or more yellow?
From my experience, surveys are just a sop to help gutless councils maintain the status quo. But even if London took the provincial way, that way assess vehicles, so you could still have no un-met demand, but more drivers coming into the trade. They just share the existing fleet.
If you wanted to limit driver numbers, I feel that would would be classed as a restraint of trade.
A lot of questions in the one posting, but can I just say that some of them are hypothetical and impossible for me to answer. The PCO have got to consider these points and I can only give my opinions.
The first point would require the number of applicants to be slowed down in accordance with the survey results and this could affect KOL schools.
On the second point I don't believe the knowledge should be made harder or simpler. I can just imagine the outcry if it was, can't you?
On the third point the unmet suburban demand is easier to assess as most of the work is done from the local station rank. As for green badge areas where there may be an overlap, some formula would have to be devised on getting the balance of yellow/green right. This should form part of the survey. How do they get the balance right now? They don't seem to have any published method - they just keep churning out licences.
As for restraint of trade, I'm not sure that would be the case. The licensing system cannot just be open-ended or we could end up with everybody on the Knowledge and 200,000 cabs and drivers with NO checks or balances. That, if that is what you are suggesting, would be quite absurd. There could be 4 cabs for every passenger and everyone would go broke. Hardly the way to run a taxi system don't you agree? Or should everybody in the trade suffer just in order to comply with or satisfy someone's idea of what 'restraint of trade' means?
Thankfully none of this is my decision - but what would you suggest is a sensible solution?
Regards,
Cruisin' Cabby