Yes, business is sh ii te so let's see where we can stick our little grubbies in to beef up the readies.
Oh yes, the taxi trade's always good for a dip into.

And the street trade takes the brunt. That's technological progress I guess.
How long will it be before it won't be possible to hail a car from the street.
Now here's the big question.
If a hackney is operating through a private booking, rather than doing what it should be and servicing the streets, then why isn't it subject to the same rules as other private hires while doing so?
And, if hackneys are operating as private hires, and denying those queuing at taxi ranks access to the street service, then why is there any restriction on the number of operating hackneys?
All the queues building up, requiring marshals to control them, and people walking the streets because they can't hail a cab, including vulnerable women etc, and all the while the taxis that should be working the streets are driving past them without passengers to answer a call to be hired privately.
While the big two are working their vested interest, having their cake and eating, denying others the right to service the street trade, and the council conspires with them to do so, it's the customers who lose out. they are the ones inconvenienced, freezing their borlocks off and putting themselves through an uneccessary risk.
So, if we are to have the two tier system we have now, with both hackneys and private hire, shouldn't hacks make the choice as to which they want to be. Private Hire with booked work through radios, or street taxis without radios, servicing the public?
And if they don't want to make such a choice, shouldn't there be only a single licensing system and no restrictions on numbers?