Quote:
A policy requiring all operators to place WAV's on service would be in compliance with the EqA. However, it was recognised that, particularly in the light of the responses received to the 2008 and 2010 consultations, there was likely to be a majority opinion in favour of a mixed fleet, as has turned out to be the case. In that event, Senior Counsel advised that having a mixed fleet would also comply with the EqA provided the percentage of WAV's is sufficiently high.
So why aren't mixed fleets required to comply with the Equality Act then?
Quote:
She further advised that it would be necessary to introduce a mechanism to address any inequality caused by allowing some operators to place less expensive vehicles on service.
Good that that's been acknowledged, but what kind of mechanism do they have in mind?
Quote:
A method for allocating licences to address any economic unfairness arising from the lower capital and running costs of saloon cars as opposed to WAV's.
Ditto, but presumably part of this sentence has gotten lost in the translation somewhere?
But that's another nine months or so and essentially they're saying they're little further on in deciding things and that they have to do a lot more work until they get there?
But of course it all helps justifying their existance and keeping themselves in a job
How long has all this being going on in Dundee now?
](./images/smilies/eusa_wall.gif)