Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 5:20 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 185 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: budgets
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
You seem to get very emotional when anyone mentions challenging the council on the Human Rights issue John, why do you think that is? :? :roll: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: budgets
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:20 am
Posts: 319
Why is your life obsessed with what the Council do ? You're so sad pal.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: budgets
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
Fairplay wrote:
Why is your life obsessed with what the Council do ? You're so sad pal.


It's you who are obsessed with the council John, because without them allowing you, your little world, you wouldn't have a fantasy in which to indulge yourself.

It's just a bit of fun and a laugh to me. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: budgets
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:35 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
ALI T wrote:
i i know somits upset you in fact its been apparent for some time that you've become somewhat disillusioned about the whole thing


Eh? I've been disillusioned since day one fifteen years ago and haven't changed my views on restricted numbers one iota, unless you know my mind better than I do?

Having said that Ali, I've never quite come across a case like yours :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: budgets
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:40 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
Skull wrote:
You're the one making it up as you go along, Dusy.

Quote:
This particular “cartel” is a consequence of council policy and not direct price fixing by agreement between parties providing a similar product or services. All the council collects is the licence fee. They would make far more money from De-restricting the market. It's a political decision to protect the vested interests of plate holders.


Which dictionary did you take that definition from?

As I said, it's a public cartel.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cartel

Quote:
Oh and Dusty, you've got an unhealthy fixation with Ali making money. It's clouding your judgment. :roll


I'm the one with a fixation for making money? #-o

And as I said my judgement hasn't changed for fifteen years.

Perhaps your judgement is clouded by the fact it's Ali rather than anyone else?

And I daresay your past dealings in plates also cloud your judgement on this as well. :?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: budgets
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
ALI T wrote:
i fail to see how a system can be abused
after all its not my system and the intention of the system is to allow the plates that aren't allowed to be sold under the governing act,to be sold .
and thats what i did,so how is that abuse.
i think what you mean is its a terrible system that makes everyone look bad,and to that i will agree.

as far as playing the victim :roll:
ive never came on here to do so.
but the applicant is the victim,and no i don't think im more deserving of a plate before anyone else,but i applied and should be treated fairly and within the law.
i doubt anyone agrees that cec have ever treated any applicant fairly,and thats Bourne out by the courts decisions over the years.
the council when summing up there data even when they find demand go as far to say were just going to ignore that bit.ffs.

the £40k that others decided to pay for a plate appears to be my fault in your eyes.
im sorry dusty its not my fault, its not my decision its theirs,they decided to buy rather than apply.
even when offered free help they decide to go with the flow.
most who ive sold to agree that the systems is fecked and the council are a shower,but they cant be bothered making a stand and fighting because the only real way to do that is apply,sadly not enough are willing to devote the time needed so they take the adopted option and buy in.

in truth, i know more than most about the Scottish system and the shennanigins of cec.its not rocket science,which isnt as hard as you might think either btw :roll:
so im certainly not on here for help
another truth is that if i was truly working the system with the intent of making shedloads ,then i would be onto a good thing and the sensible thing to do would be to keep quiet about it,rather than post on a public forum.
and yet ive always shared info as soon as it became available.
so why you feel that im on here for help or sympathy is beyond me.
the moneys a consequence of the situation,not the reason for doing it.
truth be told when i applied the last time if a hundered guys who wanted their plates enough had applied at the same time as me,and i said i was applying,then they would have all got their plates in aug 2009 and would have saved themselves a lot of hassle and a lot of time.
but they didn't they waited until after it was done before committing,and thats the real problem.
most people only make a move when its safe to do so,if they had moved on force as one at the right time then they would have crushed the council.

im not on here to promote derestriction
i support it.. yes
but you seem to view me from the standpoint that im sort sort of corrupt public figure.
please remember that im simply an applicant,and as such i have no public duty to inform the public of anything in my private life.
and yet i do,why is that. :roll:

so dusty can you tell me why you think im playing the victim
i know somits upset you in fact its been apparent for some time that you've become somewhat disillusioned about the whole thing


Well no point in going through all that Ali, we've both had our say and clearly no one is going to change their views on the issue. Anyone with the fortitude to read it all can make up their own mind.

Suffice to say though that you make it sound like it's the council who's cashing in, not yourself. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: budgets
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
ALI T wrote:
did you notice that to

you should cut me lose :lol:

lets just set the record straight gary , jim and myself dont meet in some secret location to plot blowing up council hq :shock:
perhaps we should but we dont :lol: :lol:

in fact we may share the same ideals when it comes to taxi licensing but we don't have any regular contact,in fact i haven't seen gary for years,all i do is drop the money at the secret place under the plant pot and the scam continues :roll:


What I meant was that they shouldn't be defending your actions.

I mean if it was other people then it would be a different story.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: budgets
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:54 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
Skull wrote:
Here's an idea to bring about de-restriction once and for all.

A group of individuals get together with the intention of making a single licence plate application. They go to a Human Rights Lawyer and pay for a detailed written submission to be put before the Council RC, on their behalf. The council of course refuses the licence application on the pretense they considered the Human Rights argument along with section 10.3 of the act, and special circumstances.

You then rewrite the submission into a writ of appeal and place it before a Sheriff, with a taxi driver (the applicant) presenting the case as his.

The Sheriff would be forced to consider the council's refusal under Human Rights from the outset, and if, the ruling went in the appellants favour, the council would then have to appeal against the decision all the way to the Court of Session. The applicant would simply be holding the coats, waiting for the outcome.

The fundamental principles on which the case is based would not change throughout the process. You would simply be repeating the same argument over and over.

It would be another Salteri et al situation for the council. :-|



Forget about Ali, Dusty. What do you think about the above?

I realised a while back how hard it is to get a Human Rights Lawyer to fight your case, especially if you are depending on legal aid to fund it. The key is, paying for an HR, lawyer to provide you with a submission in writing. One you can speak to before the RC, with the view to appeal against their decision at a later date, if need be. It's about getting the HR, argument into the process first, at the licensing level and then into court, to be in with a fighting chance. If you win on appeal, the council is knocked onto the back foot, the momentum lies with the appellant. :-|

Come on Dusty, what do you think?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: budgets
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:20 am
Posts: 319
Fantasy ?. what fantasy Gary?. The Taxi Trade ?. The Trade you were involved in for 20 years ?. And in that time you had 2 Plates, which you sold, (Blew the lot) and then decided to, “Rent.” for most of that time ?. Fantasy ?, nah, the Taxi Trade is part of the real world Gary, it’s just... you’re no longer allowed to be part of it mate... Ye’ve been emptied... is it hurtin’ mate.... must be, yer’ always talkin’ aboot’ it !. (So sad)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: budgets
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:57 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
Skull wrote:
ALI T wrote:
what i dont get is whats in it for the council in restricting numbers.

its not really the councillors(or is it)they seem to under the impression that they are required to restrict numbers,not that just the opposite is true.
they certainly never seem to question the why

so whats in it for them at corporate services.
their not ignorant of the facts are they,mcleod knows fine and well,indeed he said it was untenable in Aberdeen.
so whom in corporate services has an interest in continuing with this policy.
buggered if i can get a straight answer of them.


There seems to be a lack of political will to confront the issue, the council executive to back it, and the public to demand more taxis. The drivers within the trade could tip the balance but either lack the knowledge to understand the argument, are too frightened to rock the boat or simply do not care. That's not to say that, de-restriction is faraway, in today's political climate anything can happen, especially after years of in fighting. It's not unusual for politicians to allow things to calm down and then seize the initiative and make it look like it was always on the table and their idea in the first place. Maybe they are simply looking for Ph, to run the trade into the ground so the problem, for the most part, goes away. I suspect it's a combination of all the above, and for that reason the trade is finished as an industry you would want to buy into or work in. As I said before, it's now a low-paid industry where you work for scumbag politicians picking up the dregs of society, and I can't see it changing anytime soon. :-|


I think many of them think they're genuinely doing the trade a favour, and don't differentiate between the different elements in the trade. They conflate drivers with vehicles. The vast majority of councillors will never get anywhere near understanding how it works.

It also makes other aspects of regulation easier - the Sword of Damocles argument. And in general it makes it easier for councillors and officials to deal with the trade. It makes for an easy life basically. Except of course when an akward squad appears, as in Edinburgh, but generally any dissent is limited, for whatever reason.

And once it's all up and running the plate market creates its own momentum, because once people have bought in councillors don't want to see them loosing an asset. It's a variation on the easy option argument again.

Basically most of them are clueless and spineless.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: budgets
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 2:58 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
Skull wrote:
Come on Dusty, what do you think?


Give me a chance, I haven't got that far yet.

And I'll have to go and wash the dishes and make myself a coffee :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: budgets
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:10 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
Dusty Bin wrote:
Skull wrote:
ALI T wrote:
what i dont get is whats in it for the council in restricting numbers.

its not really the councillors(or is it)they seem to under the impression that they are required to restrict numbers,not that just the opposite is true.
they certainly never seem to question the why

so whats in it for them at corporate services.
their not ignorant of the facts are they,mcleod knows fine and well,indeed he said it was untenable in Aberdeen.
so whom in corporate services has an interest in continuing with this policy.
buggered if i can get a straight answer of them.


There seems to be a lack of political will to confront the issue, the council executive to back it, and the public to demand more taxis. The drivers within the trade could tip the balance but either lack the knowledge to understand the argument, are too frightened to rock the boat or simply do not care. That's not to say that, de-restriction is faraway, in today's political climate anything can happen, especially after years of in fighting. It's not unusual for politicians to allow things to calm down and then seize the initiative and make it look like it was always on the table and their idea in the first place. Maybe they are simply looking for Ph, to run the trade into the ground so the problem, for the most part, goes away. I suspect it's a combination of all the above, and for that reason the trade is finished as an industry you would want to buy into or work in. As I said before, it's now a low-paid industry where you work for scumbag politicians picking up the dregs of society, and I can't see it changing anytime soon. :-|


I think many of them think they're genuinely doing the trade a favour, and don't differentiate between the different elements in the trade. They conflate drivers with vehicles. The vast majority of councillors will never get anywhere near understanding how it works.

It also makes other aspects of regulation easier - the Sword of Damocles argument. And in general it makes it easier for councillors and officials to deal with the trade. It makes for an easy life basically. Except of course when an akward squad appears, as in Edinburgh, but generally any dissent is limited, for whatever reason.

And once it's all up and running the plate market creates its own momentum, because once people have bought in councillors don't want to see them loosing an asset. It's a variation on the easy option argument again.

Basically most of them are clueless and spineless.


I haven't a problem with the above except; I know for a fact that councillors don't give a fu*k about the man in the street or the ones driving taxis, and I've seen it with my own eyes. :-|


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: budgets
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:12 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:20 am
Posts: 319
Gary, you’ve already been told, ( By people that DO know the law), that the HR argument has nothing to do with the Council issuing Plates... Ha ha... luvin’ this ...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: budgets
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Feb 10, 2005 4:54 am
Posts: 10460
Fairplay wrote:
Gary, you’ve already been told, ( By people that DO know the law), that the HR argument has nothing to do with the Council issuing Plates... Ha ha... luvin’ this ...


Oh and who was that john? ... ha ha luvin' this #-o What a feckwit #-o


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: budgets
PostPosted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Dec 24, 2010 9:20 am
Posts: 319
Gary says, “ I know for a fact that councillors don't give a fu*k about the man in the street or the ones driving taxis, and I've seen it with my own eyes”. “FACT”. Not his opinion, “FACT”. See, his World is real to him !.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 185 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 654 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group