captain cab wrote:
Jasbar wrote:
It wasn't just the night buses, it was when they started serving the satellite towns. It decimated our country jobs.
Thing is, buses are heavily subsidised. They pay a pittance for fuel, and they can run a 300 grand bus empty because the rest of the network subsidises them to do so.
Not once, not ever did the trade get together to counter this attack on driver's earnings. They didn't rock the boat, because the owners knew that the drivers would still shell no matter how much their workload was diminished.
We're the architects of our own misfortune.
The cab trade nationally moan and groan, but they couldnt stop it even if they wanted to.
CC
Yes CC you're probably right. But we could be asking councils to justify these services on cost grounds. We could be alerting the public how the majority using buses during the day are subsidising night services.
We could also be highlighting potential safety issues. You regularly trawl the press, how come you haven't come across late night assaults and skirmishes? There's no crime on night buses? really?
And we could be highlighting how councils like Edinburgh, who spend shedloads of our cash subsidising buses, are working a vested interest.
For example, how could Edinburgh council possibly micro-manage its licensing of taxis and private hire independently in accordance with legislation when all of its decisions are made to support its own transport interests and policies?
You claim to represent the trade CC. What have you done about any of this, or anything else for that matter associated with bus services?