Taxi Driver Online

There will be Suspect old boy there will be

Day 4 still no postal details Suspect.

I can't send you the evidence if you don't let me know where to send it.

Oh and I see that your stance for not answering my posts has continued, maybe by me still asking questions others are doing likewise.

I will only send you items which are directly copied and signed by me, that way if the argument ends up in court you are furnished with the correct and varified facts. It also stops you from telling lies on here and misquoting what other people have said.

Now send me the postal details and I will send you the evidence.

B. Lucky

It's quite simple - TDO has contacted local authorities, MPs, govt bodies, the trade etc. with flyers and in a journalistic capacity. Clearly this has been obvious since day one of the site, and these people are twisting this into some kind of conspiracy to topple the world, and it's not clear why these people haven't mentioned this before, but it's presumably because they are getting desperate.

And in any contact with outsiders TDO has never claimed to represent forum contributors.

The solicitor nonsense is Fantasy Island stuff, and the failure to provide any evidence at all speaks volumes.

We don't want any 'evidence' sent to us because there is none, you just want our contact details for ulterior motives.

Your failure to provide any evidence speaks volumes.

By the way, there will be no litigation on our behalf, since the judge would just say ask why we didn't delete the defamatory posts?

Well the reason is because we wanted to show readers that your claims are wholly false, but the defamatory statements will be deleted in time.

So I would hurry up with your evidence.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk

Wot, still no evidence?

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk

Beware the ides of March. Mr Angel.

lol

I have always wondered what individual quality the TGWU looks for in a junior officer or Branch secretary? Take Mr Marchant for instance? Would you employ him for his brains or his stupidity? It is doubtful the TGWU would have employed him for his brains, so therefore they must have employed him for his stupidity.

You might consider the case in Gateshead. It might appear to some that the TGWU aren't too fussy about their choice of representative, I say that because they employed a character in Gateshead who would be better suited to the film industry rather than the Taxi trade. No his name is not Walter Mitty but he has a distinct likeness to that character.

The transport and General workers union representative in Gateshead likes to cross dress. He has tried on many personas in the past, which I'm sure his bosses at Transport house are well aware off. However that does not tell the true story of this individual.

The full story I'm quite sure will manifest itself before the "ides of March".

JD

Mmm keep plugging Spenna you might get there in the end. 4 days to go You can run but you can't hide I'm going to have the biggest drink poured for me

Whatever I'm not a branch secretary I don't want to be one Junior officer?? I don't want to be one 4 days to go



Wor Mick looks gorgeous in a dress I had the pleasure of holding his hand last week in Newcastle I'll tell you something Spenna if all the taxi drivers were like him we'd have no trouble at all from the likes of you and Suspect and the tin can.

_________________
IDFIMH

There will be Suspect there will be, never underestimate the insane.

4 days to go

Careful JD.

Mike is meant to be posting anonymously.

_________________
There is Significant Unmet Demand for my Opinion.

_________________
IDFIMH

So the only evidence supplied thus far to support these various allegations is that TDO has been contacting LAs?

That should have been obvious to everyone from day 1 of the site, but almost a year and a half later you're using that fact to accuse the site of all sorts?

I pity you, I really do

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk

So first you say that the site doesn't do something then you say it does.

Then they claim that when they send information out they do so using the name of the site HOWEVER they claim that they do not send out information on behalf of the members of this site.

So who exactly is the site claiming to be representing, or moreso where are they claiming they obtained the information contained within these documents they are sending out.

Captain Cab was right to be cynical of Myth and Reality, not because it was wrong but because it added little reality and offered only more myths. I say that because it is as equally bias as documents writted in support of quotas.

Unfortunatly the REALITY is quite different to ANYTHING written.

Some areas need more vehicles whereas other areas have adequate provision, each individual council have a duty to consider whats best for the people they represent and so MUST properly IDENTIFY EXACTLY WHAT IS REQUIRED THEN LOOK TO PROVIDE IT.

The mathematics are not difficult, people talk about prices and wish to see prices more competitive.
Well I can tell you this much, allowing an unlimited number of vehicles reduces takings, drivers who see their takings reducing look to make more money from each job therefore the fewer jobs they do the MORE they need from each job. If a driver can expect more of the share of work then less could be charged for each job.

I hope Sussex gets a plate, cause he won't last a week. Taxidrivers don't like people who [edited by admin] up their backs, and Sussex is the sort of bloke who will think he's being clever when he starts discounting off the rank. He can't hide behind his computer under an assumed name then, I know what happened to a bloke up here who tried it, not nice at all.

Myth and Reality offers an opposing viewpoint to that offered by the other "groups" NEITHER OF WHICH ACTUALLY KNOW WHAT ITS LIKE WORKING THE RANKS IN THIS COUNTRY.

B. Lucky

Change the subject, why don't you?

As regards who TDO represents, I've tried to explain it to the best of my ability, but if you still think that third parties think that we represent the views of forum members then why do you keep on posting?

TDO has never claimed to represent forum members.

As regards the defamatory comments, you clearly don't have any specific evidence, since you won't post either names or any other information to substantiate your claims.

But I've certainly conluded that you THINK you have evidence of something, but what it amounts to I obviously can't tell without you offering some details.

So why don't you be a bit more specific, so readers can see what evidence you base your allegations on, and we can explain where you are going wrong, since your conclusions must be based more on speculation than proper evidence.

If you don't want to name this supposed solicitor or any LAs that he's contacted, then why don't you tell us in general terms what the nature of your evidence is?

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk