TDO wrote:
So despite claiming to have 'massive amounts of evidence' to support these allegations, the failure to provide this or even say when it will forthcoming strongly suggests that you've concluded that your evidence in fact amounts to absolutely nothing.
THE SILENCE IS DEAFENING!!
You may think the silence is deafening Dusty, but neither my PM or my email inbox contains information as to where evidence should be forwarded.
I would also like to take this opportunity to state that some evidence has been provided, the banning of Nidge and MRT, the unfounded allegations that "someone" is writing something that another posts, are all contributing factors that this site and very possibly you in particular have something to hide.
I will clarify for anyone interested that I have agreed to send the information I'm fully aware of, to the administrators of this site, they have to date failed to supply it.
I would also say that allegations have been made on here, along with evidence relative to the membership of this site, I do not wish to dictate which side of the argument they should believe, if either, as I would much rather they made up their own minds.
So I reiterate, an allegation was made that a person had contacted local authorities using the name Taxi Driver Online, this person had claimed that information and opinion had been gathered from the membership of the site, all working taxidrivers, and the administrators had written a "paper" based on that information under the heading "Myth and Reality". Alongside this "paper" a list had been produced showing plate values in all restricted councils throughout the UK.
Along with this list and the Myth and Reality document, councils were also sent "mis-quoted" passages from both the OFT investigation and the DfT review.
Initially I had concerns that M&R would be used to express the views of the membership of this site, but at that time membership to the site was "open", and I knew from previous experience that councils questioned the credibility of such sites as they had no form of record on which to base their credentials. Then all of a sudden, about 9 months after the release of the M&R document the site decided to insist that in order to contribute registration was required and further "papers" were circulated.
At that time people who had shared my concerns started to notice other things, some from within their own area other from what they had been told. Some of these people decided to collate the varied information with the same name being mentioned time and time again.
This name was then published on this site, the post was deleted and the poster banned, subsequent posts mentioning the same name are still being automatically altered, with the question as to why remaining unanswered.
This evidence alone should be sufficiant at least to question the real intentions of the administration of this site, again I'm asking NO-ONE to believe me, all I ask is that you ask the questions.
The administrators of this site have admitted to contating councils, offering the M&R document and subsequently published lists, they claim however that they have NOT claimed to have published "on our behalf" but at best they imply that it was all compiled by us, even if the final document was written by them.
Who exactly are these people, does it matter that they are possibly using your details to promote what they believe is the way forward without your permission or knowledge, even if you disagree.
A number of prominant posters have reduced their contribution since this issue was raised, to the point that they still visit and read but do not actually post at all.
The admin want the evidence, they claim that it hasn't been offered but as I've said the evidence is contained within the pages of this website, if anyone cares to look.
B. Lucky
Login
Register
FAQ
