Taxi marshal trial will not be continued A BID to reconsider a decision to continue a trial taxi marshal scheme has been rejected.
The taxi marshals operate at peak times at weekends in Wilson Street, in Middlesbrough.
Recently Julia Rostron, executive councillor for community safety, agreed to continue the trial while efforts continued to find a permanent solution to issues of hackney carriages and private hire vehicles using Wilson Street.
But Councillor Michael Hudson led a call-in of the decision because the decision to extend the trial of taxi marshals was “unfair towards the private hire trade and fails to consider public safety and fails to consider the other options”.
The call-in was considered by the council’s Overview and Scrutiny Board.
Cllr Hudson was accompanied by solicitor John Ellwood who told the Overview and Scrutiny Board that a consultant’s report commissioned by the council had recommended against taxi marshals being used in Wilson Street.
It said marshals should be used on super-ranks to be established elsewhere in the town.
Mr Ellwood said that closing some hackney carriage ranks on Wilson Street and moving them elsehwere and having taxi marshals in those locations was a solution.
Private hire vehicles would then be able to pick up and drop off passengers in Wilson Street.
Councillor Rostron said: “My decision to extend the trial period was made after considering all the facts and looking at all the correspondence we received, particularly from the police. More people were in favour of taxi marshals than were opposed to them.
“Public order and safety has improved since the taxi marshals were introduced. We are looking to find a permanent solution and we are giving ourselves more time to find that permanent solution.”
The Overview and Scrutiny Board rejected the call to refer the issue back to Cllr Rostron for further consideration.
Councillor Jan Brunton, chairman of the Overview and Scrutiny Board said: “The executive councillor had lots of information and the decision has been made on that. In the interests of public safety I agree with the decision that was taken.”
Read More
http://www.gazettelive.co.uk/news/teess ... z1qtmRV3Ed