Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sat May 02, 2026 4:30 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
Daily Telegraph Weds 11th April 2012.

A rickshaw driver has been fined for risking the lives of his passengers after he was caught furiously racing a colleague along a busy London street. Md Islam 21, was seen weaving between cars in central London as his passengers egged him on by screaming, shouting and trying to slap the hands of the passengers in the second rickshaw, a court was told. Police flagged down Islam and arrested him after the race along Shaftesbury Avenue. He later admitted putting road users and pedestrians in danger by furiously racing another rickshaw. Westminster magistrates were told.

Islam of East Ham pleaded guilty to breaching section 54 of the metropolitan police act, 1839 and was fined £100 with £85 costs.

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Good find Jimbo.

London rickshaw driver fined for "furious driving" after racing on busy West End street


Prosecutors use 19th Century Act to bring charge, Boris promises to get tough on rickshaws

The driver of a London rickshaw has been fined £100 and has to pay costs totalling a further £145 after being caught racing another rickshaw along a busy street in the West End.

Md Islam, aged 21, pleaded guilty at Westminster Magistrates’ Court to a charge brought under section 54 of the Metropolitan Police Act 1839.

That legislation, originally designed to address the “furious riding” of horse-drawn carts, is now being used by police to address issues related to rickshaws - also known as pedicabs - reports the London Evening Standard.

The Act makes it an offence to be engaged in the “riding or driving furiously such as to endanger the life or limb of any person, or to the common danger of the passengers in the thoroughfare.”

Prosecutor Rav Chodha told the court: “The defendant had passengers in his pedicab and the nature of his driving, weaving in and out of heavy traffic, was causing a danger to both passengers and other road users.”

She said that the passengers in his rickshaw at the time of the incident on the evening of 23 March had been “screaming and shouting,” and were also attempting to slap the hands of those in the other rickshaw.

“The defendant was observed for some time and then stopped and arrested,” she added.

District Judge Michael Snow told Islam that he was fortunate not to have faced more serious charges, saying, “This has been under-charged; this was potentially very serious.

“Cycling like this through central London with passengers, and putting passengers, pedestrians and drivers at risk is clearly very serious,” he added.

Islam, of East Ham, admitted breaching section 54 of the Metropolitan Police Act 1839 and besides the £100 fine has to pay £85 costs, a £15 victim surcharge and £45 to Westminster City Council for storing his rickshaw.

The Evening Standard reports that police are currently clamping down on rickshaw drivers in the West End, and quoted a senior officer as saying that since there was no legislation specific to the vehicles, it was “using the tools available.”

The Licensed Taxi Drivers Association, which represents London’s black cab drivers, has campaigned for rickshaws to be banned from the capital’s streets. The London Pedicab Operators Association, meanwhile, is lobbying for licensing to be introduced, rather than rickshaws being banned outright.

In his Transport Manifesto for next month’s mayoral elections, current Mayor of London Boris Johnson says that it is out of his power to take such action, but adds that he does intend to tackle the issue if re-elected.

“Rickshaws, or pedicabs, have proliferated in central London in recent years. Unregulated, often uninsured, usually over-priced and frequently dangerous, they have attracted increasing complaints from other road users about their behaviour and about the many close misses that have nearly costs lives,’ his manifesto says.

“The Mayor does not have the powers to ban them, but I am already using the powers I do have to crack down on badly conducted rickshaws in London. I will do so increasingly in partnership with other agencies, such as the UK Border Agency and HM Revenue and Customs.”

http://road.cc/content/news/56531-londo ... end-street

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 9:09 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:23 pm
Posts: 203
If I was a London Cabby I would be very tempted to apply a byelaw from the same period, asking for a Policeman to place his cloak around him while he takes a crap in the street. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57355
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
District Judge Michael Snow told Islam that he was fortunate not to have faced more serious charges, saying, “This has been under-charged; this was potentially very serious.

Another CPS f*** up. :sad:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:36 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Sussex wrote:
Another CPS f*** up. :sad:


maybe......but aint that law commission thingy talking about these daft, archaic and stupid laws?

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 10:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57355
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
Sussex wrote:
Another CPS f*** up. :sad:


maybe......but aint that law commission thingy talking about these daft, archaic and stupid laws?

I suspect the DJ was thinking that they should have charged the defendant under any number of offences coming out of the 1988 Road Traffic Act.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cerberus and 753 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group