Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun Apr 19, 2026 12:54 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 94 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
toots wrote:

Are you sure about that :lol:



I've been told by someone wiser

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:19 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
captain cab wrote:
toots wrote:

Are you sure about that :lol:



I've been told by someone wiser


I'm sure you have and don't dispute it, but, there must be more than one string to the bow :wink:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:20 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
toots wrote:
captain cab wrote:
toots wrote:

Are you sure about that :lol:



I've been told by someone wiser


I'm sure you have and don't dispute it, but, there must be more than one string to the bow :wink:



yeah I apparently come from an immaculate conception ffs

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 12:22 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:43 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
captain cab wrote:
toots wrote:
I see, there you go again suggesting bad things :wink:



Yeah, I think its fab he can donate over quarter of a million quid to a political party when it has been suggested his drivers dont earn enough.

CC

Chicken feed compared to the cost of employing all those self employed drivers :wink:

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:48 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
BTW, if using the bus lane is a criminal offence, isn't Griffin inciting his drivers to commit a crime, also aiding and abetting by offering to pay the fines?

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 6:44 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:38 pm
Posts: 431
Sussex wrote:
andycable wrote:
I guess you guys dont think add lee will get their way................... i've got a tenner here that says they will...... any offers ?

I'm not a betting man, but if I was I would gladly take your bet.

Addison Lee might win the case, in fact I think Euro Law is on their side, but this will lead to TfL merely banning both taxi and PH from the bus lanes.


I think this whole thing is a 'spoiling tactic". Hackneys will be banned from the Bus Lanes.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:31 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
gusmac wrote:
Chicken feed compared to the cost of employing all those self employed drivers :wink:


Or fully complying with the equality bill :shock:

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:09 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57306
Location: 1066 Country
GBC wrote:
and we do a very different job to a privately booked journey with a fixed price, compared to a public hire on a meter with a driver who knows where he's going, drives a wheelchair accessible taxi, and needs to constantly pick up and set down at the kerb.
Simplifying it to 'we both take passengers from a to b' doesn't wash, so does a private car, so does a van . . .

I'm not convinced black cabs doing radio work are that much different to PH vehicles doing radio work.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57306
Location: 1066 Country
tom2907 wrote:
I think this whole thing is a 'spoiling tactic". Hackneys will be banned from the Bus Lanes.

I think you are right.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 8:15 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57306
Location: 1066 Country
I took the liberty of copying this from the Manchester Taxi Forum. :shock:

Comments from the solicitor that represents the Manchester PH trade.

Subject: RE: London bus lanes

My advice remains as it was.

I agree with Addison Lee that a scheme which excludes PHV’s from bus lanes does discriminate against those drivers and more importantly their passengers, who may not appreciate that a PHV may be required to take a longer route at greater cost.


English law differs from European Law in that there is in law a distinction between PHVs and hackney carriages and the AGMA group of councils has written its regulations so as to favour hackneys. On a literal interpretation of those regulations any PHV driver who drives in a bus lane does commit an offence and falls to be convicted before a magistrates’ court, as that court lacks the power to redraft the law. It must also be noted that the AGMA group of councils has adopted a policy which does not apply nationally. (I was in Norwich recently where phv’s are allowed to use bus lanes as part of that city’s transport plan.)


When I wrote to Manchester City Council I asked them to suspend the enforcement policy pending any challenge by way of judicial review. Now that there is a prospect of such a review that is something the council should re-visit. Any driver who is prosecuted for such an offence would be entitled in my view to have the proceedings adjourned until after the judicial review is concluded, as were the case to proceed and result in a conviction the courts would face the prospect of having to resolve a considerable number of appeals after the event. If all Addison Lee’s drivers and any others do chose to act on the advice that the drivers have been given from Addison Lee it seems to me the council will be hard pressed to take enforcement action against all of them. Any proceedings must ne commenced within six months of the date of the offence and I doubt the council has the resources to cope with mass civil disobedience of that type.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 11:07 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Dec 25, 2004 4:28 pm
Posts: 8998
Location: London
Sussex wrote:
GBC wrote:
and we do a very different job to a privately booked journey with a fixed price, compared to a public hire on a meter with a driver who knows where he's going, drives a wheelchair accessible taxi, and needs to constantly pick up and set down at the kerb.
Simplifying it to 'we both take passengers from a to b' doesn't wash, so does a private car, so does a van . . .

I'm not convinced black cabs doing radio work are that much different to PH vehicles doing radio work.



That's about 5000 out of 26000, in the case of minicabs that's about 65000, out of 65000.

Even radio taxis get the majority of their work by the kerbside nowadays.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 1:50 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:38 pm
Posts: 431
http://www.addisonlee.com/press/read/560


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 4:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 14, 2004 12:26 am
Posts: 130
GBC wrote:
Griffen doesn't want access to the bus lanes, they're already choc a bloc with roadworks, vans unloading, taxis, bikes, motorbikes . . .

He wants taxis out.



Ah my old friend - the penny drops :lol:

_________________
"Where to, Guv'?. Na sorry not going my way"


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 17, 2012 7:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:38 pm
Posts: 431
Tuesday, 17 April 2012
TfL Press Release 6/12
Updated information for all Private Hire Drivers and Operators


Further to TPH notice 05/12 issued on Sunday 15 April 2012 with information for private hire drivers and operators, TfL can confirm that an interim injunction to order Addison Lee plc to withdraw the letter issued to drivers has been applied for. This letter was issued by a director of Addison Lee plc to its PHV drivers in which he stated (among other things) that they were “fully entitled to use the bus lanes” and that he would indemnify them in respect of fines and other liabilities incurred as a result of following his advice. TfL’s application was made on Monday 16 April, and a hearing is set to take place on Monday 23 April.

Under current regulations it is illegal for London private hire vehicles (PHVs) to drive in Bus Lanes operated by Transport for London (TfL) and London Local Authorities except when picking up and setting down passengers.
As regulatory authority for taxis and PHVs in London, TfL considers the decision to issue this letter inciting drivers to break the law is irresponsible. TfL will review the fitness of the PHV licence holder to continue holding its licence. TfL and the Police have and will continue to monitor the use of Bus Lanes by Addison Lee and other licensed PHV drivers. We are pleased to note that contraventions have so far been minimal. However, those PHV drivers that were contravening the regulations other than to set down and pick up passengers will be subject to further action. Wilful criminal behaviour is viewed with the upmost concern.

TfL hereby reminds all licensed PHV drivers in London: under current regulations, driving a PHV in a Bus Lane, during the hours when the Bus Lane is operative (and other than to pick up and set down passengers) is a criminal offence for which PHV drivers may be personally prosecuted. Those regulations remain valid until and unless there is a court order suspending their effect. There has been no such court order. This means that, as a PHV driver, you must not drive in Bus Lanes other than to pick up and set down passengers. If you do so, you will be committing a criminal offence and you will be personally liable to prosecution, irrespective of any indemnity which anyone else may purport to give. TfL has power to suspend or revoke a PHV operator’s or driver’s licence if it is no longer satisfied that the licence holder is fit to hold such a licence.

Please take note that: drivers who repeatedly contravene traffic regulations, including by intentionally driving in Bus Lanes, other than to pick up or set down passengers, may be considered unfit to hold a PHV driver’s licence; and operators who encourage such conduct may be considered unfit to hold a PHV operator’s licence.

TfL requests operators to bring this notice to the attention of all their PHV drivers.

John Mason

Director, Taxi and Private Hire


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 94 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 238 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group