Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 23, 2026 9:38 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 6:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57319
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
Mr Glasgow added that "the events described by these claimants are so rare" that their arguments in the case "do not have broad policy implications".

That seems to indicate to me that he is not confident of victory, on the insurance front.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:45 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
toots wrote:
Good luck to them but personally where does this end, could it be that the insurance company could blame the licence department because without the licence he wouldn't have been able to do this either. Another concern is that if this case is won the effects on the insurance for drivers could be alarming. How do the insurance companies perform a risk assessment for this kind of incident?



The insurance company couldn't blame the licensing department, because the licensing department could prove that they had taken all resonable steps to ensure the driver was "fit and proper"

Which is why we all have to stump up for CRB checks, so your local authority can cover their own arses against legal actions such as this.

They serve no other useful purpose, apart from keeping several hundred scousers in meaningful employment.

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
Just how many CRB checks did Warboys have?

Didn't stop the creep did it?

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
jimbo wrote:


The insurance company couldn't blame the licensing department, because the licensing department could prove that they had taken all resonable steps to ensure the driver was "fit and proper"

Which is why we all have to stump up for CRB checks, so your local authority can cover their own arses against legal actions such as this.

They serve no other useful purpose, apart from keeping several hundred scousers in meaningful employment.



Not so sure about that in the case of Worboys, I seem to remember the met police and tfl mentioning his name in respect of a possible rape suspect well before he was caught.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20846
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
captain cab wrote:
jimbo wrote:


The insurance company couldn't blame the licensing department, because the licensing department could prove that they had taken all resonable steps to ensure the driver was "fit and proper"

Which is why we all have to stump up for CRB checks, so your local authority can cover their own arses against legal actions such as this.

They serve no other useful purpose, apart from keeping several hundred scousers in meaningful employment.



Not so sure about that in the case of Worboys, I seem to remember the met police and tfl mentioning his name in respect of a possible rape suspect well before he was caught.

CC

I bet they didn't pass that info on to the insurers though !!

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 8:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
edders23 wrote:
I bet they didn't pass that info on to the insurers though !!



The insurance company....whoever they are, will employ barristers, who employ a little girl in the office to do a defence....then they'll charge the insurance company an extortionate amount for the work the little girl in the office did......and hopefully she'll read TDO.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Quote:
I bet they didn't pass that info on to the insurers though !!


Or the council for that matter

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:35 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
edders23 wrote:
captain cab wrote:
jimbo wrote:


The insurance company couldn't blame the licensing department, because the licensing department could prove that they had taken all resonable steps to ensure the driver was "fit and proper"

Which is why we all have to stump up for CRB checks, so your local authority can cover their own arses against legal actions such as this.

They serve no other useful purpose, apart from keeping several hundred scousers in meaningful employment.



Not so sure about that in the case of Worboys, I seem to remember the met police and tfl mentioning his name in respect of a possible rape suspect well before he was caught.

CC

I bet they didn't pass that info on to the insurers though !!



That someone is a "possible" rape "suspect" is not information (is it?)

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:38 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Quote:
That someone is a "possible" rape "suspect" is not information (is it?)


From an insurance point of view you are probably right but from the point a view of the council you could possibly be wrong

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
jimbo wrote:

That someone is a "possible" rape "suspect" is not information (is it?)



It is under the civil rule of law....the one you're licensed under.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
captain cab wrote:
jimbo wrote:

That someone is a "possible" rape "suspect" is not information (is it?)



It is under the civil rule of law....the one you're licensed under.

CC



Joe Stalin would 've loved it.

Like Germany in the 1930's then. A neighbour pees you off, denounce them to the gestapo, and off to the concentration camp for "retraining"?

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
jimbo wrote:


Joe Stalin would 've loved it.

Like Germany in the 1930's then. A neighbour pees you off, denounce them to the gestapo, and off to the concentration camp for "retraining"?


I'm sure he would....sadly there's caselaw.

CC

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2005 8:23 pm
Posts: 5003
Location: Lincoln
captain cab wrote:
jimbo wrote:


Joe Stalin would 've loved it.

Like Germany in the 1930's then. A neighbour pees you off, denounce them to the gestapo, and off to the concentration camp for "retraining"?


I'm sure he would....sadly there's caselaw.

CC


Caselaw of people being arrested on suspicion of being possibly suspected of something or other? Whats the maximum sentence for that "crime"?

_________________
Former taxi driver


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 9:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
jimbo wrote:

Caselaw of people being arrested on suspicion of being possibly suspected of something or other? Whats the maximum sentence for that "crime"?


whatever....they fact remains he was licensed, like the rest of us, on the basis of civil not criminal law.

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 24, 2012 10:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
jimbo wrote:
captain cab wrote:
jimbo wrote:


Joe Stalin would 've loved it.

Like Germany in the 1930's then. A neighbour pees you off, denounce them to the gestapo, and off to the concentration camp for "retraining"?


I'm sure he would....sadly there's caselaw.

CC


Caselaw of people being arrested on suspicion of being possibly suspected of something or other? Whats the maximum sentence for that "crime"?


Would you like somebody who was suspected of rape driving your daughter home? Which is after all what Worboys was allegedly suspected of and such suspicions were not passed to the council

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 46 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 836 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group