Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 08, 2026 12:44 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Leeds taxi drivers stage rush hour ‘go slow’ protest


Commuters faced disruption on Monday when taxi drivers staged a ‘go slow’ through Leeds city centre.

Cabbies – who are campaigning for a taxi rank outside Leeds Bradford Airport – drove in convoy through the city during the morning rush hour.

A second protest was planned for this afternoon between 4pm and 6pm.

The taxi drivers began their rolling protest at Gibraltar Island Road in Hunslet, along the A58M inner ring road and on to Leeds Civic Hall – where they aimed to hammer their message home.

The cabbies, members of the Leeds hackney carriage branch of Unite the Union, are angry at Leeds City Council for failing to progress plans to install a taxi rank at the airport.

Since 2008, a single private hire company has been contracted to provide services on the airport forecourt. Other taxi firms can only drop off and collect outside the airport or pay an additional charge which is passed on to passengers.

The council agreed to look into the possibility of installing a public rank on Whitehouse Lane. But projected costs escalated ten-fold to over £900,000 and the scheme was shelved.

Cabbies are also angry at what they say is the council’s refusal to meet for talks.

Union branch chairman Paul Landau said drivers felt that they had no option but to resort to protest action – and said today’s go slows could be the first of many.

He said the only contact the branch had had from the council was an email from councillor Richard Lewis inviting them to ring his secretary.

Mr Landau said: “It was hardly in a conciliatory tone and basically pointed out he was a very busy man.

“We feel we have done as much as we can to progress talks. We now want a definite time and date to meet with the council.”

Coun Lewis, the city’s executive member for development, said the council’s “door was open”, but the drivers much conduct themselves in a “more professional manner”.

He added: “We offered to meet the taxi drivers to discuss their concerns, but they did not respond until after the end of the working day on Friday and then with the ultimatum that they would be protesting on Monday if we couldn’t see them then.

“Instead they have chosen to disrupt the city’s commuters who are trying to get on with their own jobs. This is no way to do business, particularly since we are not actually involved in their dispute with the airport and that we acknowledge their predicament.

“We sympathise with those drivers who feel that their not being awarded a contract by Leeds Bradford Airport has had a negative effect on their trade when they are already suffering considerably from the impact of the recession.

“Our door is open for them to talk to us if they conduct themselves in a more professional manner.”

source: http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/n ... 1-4500977#

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 30, 2012 6:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20868
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
thats the idea embarrass the council into looking at it again by drawinf lots of attention in the media good luck lads far more effective than a strike here's hoping it gets a result !

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 01, 2012 10:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Leeds taxi drivers’ rush hour convoy UPDATED


Image



Commuters faced disruption yesterday (April 30) when taxi drivers staged two ‘go slows’ through Leeds city centre.

Cabbies campaigning for a taxi rank outside Leeds Bradford Airport drove in convoy through the city at both morning and evening rush hours.

The drivers, members of union Unite, are angry at Leeds City Council for failing to progress plans to install a taxi rank at the airport.

The council agreed to look into the possibility of installing a public rank on Whitehouse Lane. But projected costs escalated 10-fold to £900,000 and the scheme was shelved.

Union branch chairman Paul Landau said drivers felt they had no option but to protest – and said yesterday’s go slow could be the first of many. He said the only contact the branch had had from the council was an email from Councillor Richard Lewis inviting them to ring his secretary. “It was hardly in a conciliatory tone and basically pointed out he was a very busy man,” he said.

http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/n ... -1-4500977

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 1:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Letter: Cabbies’ protest too little, too late


MANY in Leeds will believe the actions of hackney carriage drivers deliberately holding up traffic in connection with their grievance over access to Leeds-Bradford International Airport both anti-social and illegal, and will hope West Yorkshire police and Leeds City Council hackney carriage licensing Panel are taking note.

Also, what Unite, or any other union, has to do with a group of – by definition – self-employed drivers, who either own their own plated vehicle or rent one off somebody else by the week, also seems a mystery, as does this grievance with the council, when it is the private owners of the airport causing them grief.

Years ago, hackney carriage operators had their own trade groups e.g. Streamline or Telecabs etc, who held exclusive agreements at places like Leeds City Station for their members.

Surely some organisation like that ought to have negotiated with the bidders for Leeds Airport at the time of sale, not years after an exclusive contract for access was granted one private hire firm, leaving them out in the cold.

Why should they even think of asking council tax payers to pay for an airport layby or anything else in these difficult times? I hope Leeds City Council tells them so!

D S Boyes, Rodley Lane, Leeds


http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/n ... -1-4525118

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 1:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
I think the letter writer has a point :shock:

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 2:06 pm 
Why should they even think of asking council tax payers to pay for an airport layby or anything else in these difficult times? I hope Leeds City Council tells them so!


Durrr, because they pay Leeds council a large sum of money in fees each year perhaps, I'd like to see the response from this person if their manager said one morning we're bringing in two more ppl to work with you and you wages are going down by 66%, be a different tune then wouldn't it, this person is just like all the other I'm alright Jack [edited by admin] in this world imo.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 3:39 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Doom wrote:


Durrr, because they pay Leeds council a large sum of money in fees each year perhaps, I'd like to see the response from this person if their manager said one morning we're bringing in two more ppl to work with you and you wages are going down by 66%, be a different tune then wouldn't it, this person is just like all the other I'm alright Jack [edited by admin] in this world imo.



You are of course right doom, part of the act in connection with proprietors allows fees to cover the cost of ranks;

Leeds has 537 hackney carriages, it should only cost them £1675.97p each

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 08, 2012 3:56 pm 
captain cab wrote:
Doom wrote:


Durrr, because they pay Leeds council a large sum of money in fees each year perhaps, I'd like to see the response from this person if their manager said one morning we're bringing in two more ppl to work with you and you wages are going down by 66%, be a different tune then wouldn't it, this person is just like all the other I'm alright Jack [edited by admin] in this world imo.



You are of course right doom, part of the act in connection with proprietors allows fees to cover the cost of ranks;

Leeds has 537 hackney carriages, it should only cost them £1675.97p each



Thats only if you pay £900k for a kerb to be moved and some signs and line paint, I think the quote included some trouser action myself, if there's 50k of work there I'd be surprised, oh hang on


Consultation of rank creation, must use my mate - £275000
Finalisation of agreement - £275000
Paint - £100000
Signs - £200000
Kerb materials - £40000
Opening ceremony - £8000
Ten labourers - £2000

GT = £900000

Yep, I see how the costs are now. =D>


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 8:17 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
No-go to plans for Leeds Bradford Airport taxi rank



Airport bosses are continuing to resist calls for a taxi rank to be laid out on the forecourt of Leeds-Bradford Airport.


And the issue will be discussed next week by councillors when they meet to discuss the airport’s proposed forecourt management plan, which does not include a rank.

The aim of the plan is to ensure the free flow of traffic to and from the airport.

It has to be approved by the council as a condition of a planning consent for a two-storey extension to the airport terminal, on which work has yet to start.

Members of the council’s east plans panel are to visit the airport before they make a decision on the traffic management plan at their meeting on Thursday.

A report to the panel says that in talks with airport bosses over some months, highways and planning officers have “requested the airport strongly” to consider providing a forecourt taxi rank but the airport has rejected those calls.

The provision of a rank has proved a contentious issue.

The airport has a contract with a private hire company and taxis are not allowed to “rank up” outside the airport.

It prompted a call from taxi operators for the council to create a rank on Whitehouse Lane, the main approach to the airport, but senior councillors rejected the scheme as too expensive.

There was further controversy last year when the airport introduced a £2 charge for motorists, allowing them to park on the forecourt for up to 30 minutes to pick-up and drop-off passengers.

Many motorists opted to avoid the charge by picking up and dropping off in Whitehouse Lane, causing traffic congestion in the area.

Now the airport is proposing to help overcome the problem by creating a new designated drop-off facility in the long-stay car park.

It will have up to 50 spaces and provide one hour of free parking.

The report to be considered by the panel says the airport has pointed out the designated area would be “in sight of and within comfortable walking distance” of the terminal and a shuttle bus could be used.

http://www.yorkshireeveningpost.co.uk/n ... -1-4625791

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 9:15 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Could the council insist that a rank be provided as a condition of the planning approval? If the airport were to include a taxi rank in their proposals, would they then be in breach of the contract that they have with the Private Hire company?

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Jun 09, 2012 8:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57375
Location: 1066 Country
grandad wrote:
Could the council insist that a rank be provided as a condition of the planning approval? If the airport were to include a taxi rank in their proposals, would they then be in breach of the contract that they have with the Private Hire company?

Yes and possibly depending on the wording of the contract.

Of course the airport can appeal if the council insist on a rank, but I feel it's worth the risk.

As for the contract, one has to wonder why the cab trade don't outbid the PH operator.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:47 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
Thats the way get stuck in well done UNITE :D :D

what party runs the council could be a short cut available for them ??

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 12:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24392
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
Doom wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Doom wrote:


Durrr, because they pay Leeds council a large sum of money in fees each year perhaps, I'd like to see the response from this person if their manager said one morning we're bringing in two more ppl to work with you and you wages are going down by 66%, be a different tune then wouldn't it, this person is just like all the other I'm alright Jack [edited by admin] in this world imo.



You are of course right doom, part of the act in connection with proprietors allows fees to cover the cost of ranks;

Leeds has 537 hackney carriages, it should only cost them £1675.97p each



Thats only if you pay £900k for a kerb to be moved and some signs and line paint, I think the quote included some trouser action myself, if there's 50k of work there I'd be surprised, oh hang on


Consultation of rank creation, must use my mate - £275000
Finalisation of agreement - £275000
Paint - £100000
Signs - £200000
Kerb materials - £40000
Opening ceremony - £8000
Ten labourers - £2000

GT = £900000



Plus a bung somewhere.....

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 700 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group