Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu May 07, 2026 11:44 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 3:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Tanker drivers accept deal, end strike fears

LONDON | Fri May 11, 2012 2:51pm BST

LONDON (Reuters) - The threat of a petrol delivery strike, which prompted panic buying at the pumps last month, was lifted as fuel tanker drivers narrowly voted to accept an offer from seven oil distribution firms over pay and conditions, the Unite union said on Friday.

Unite, which represents 2,000 drivers who voted for a strike in March, said 51 percent of truckers had voted to accept new proposals put forward by the haulage firms which supply Britain's petrol stations after lengthy talks. Turnout was 69 percent.

"This narrow vote in favour lifts the threat of strike action, but leaves the companies with no room for complacency," said Diana Holland, Unite assistant general secretary.

The dispute rattled the government and led to huge queues at forecourts when Prime Minister David Cameron and Cabinet Minister Francis Maude advised motorists to fill up their cars and store fuel in jerry cans.

That led to widespread criticism from fuel retailers and fire-fighters, and the advice was later withdrawn.

The government also began training army personnel to drive fuel tankers in the event of any action to avoid a repeat of blockades of depots by hauliers and farmers in 2000 that almost brought the country to a standstill.

"Francis Maude's calamitous intervention highlighted that this country runs on unstable, short fuel supplies," Holland said. "It is not a jerry can in the garage we need, but a review of whether the industry is structured in the national interest."

Any strike could have hit 90 percent of Britain's fuel station forecourts and stocks would have begun to run dry within 48 hours of any action, according to Unite.

Drivers at four of the seven firms involved - Wincanton, DHL, Hoyer, BP, Norbert Dentressangle, Turners and Suckling - actually voted to reject the deal to settle the dispute over issues ranging from health and safety to pay and pensions.

Holland said the vote sent a warning to the companies that they would be held to account over assurances over contracts and improved terms.

The Road Haulage Association said common sense had prevailed but added that they were "not out of the woods yet".

Source; http://uk.reuters.com/article/2012/05/1 ... P620120511

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 3:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
Thank uck for that!!

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri May 11, 2012 3:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
It was inevitable it was to keep your mind pre-occupied :wink:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2012 10:45 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24392
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
dont bank on it, not till Labour get back in and the Unions are put back in thier box for 5 years

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 10:04 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:23 pm
Posts: 203
Still the fearmongering served it purpose, boosted the GDP figures to help hide the true cost of the so called austerity.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 12:47 pm 
taxeman wrote:
Still the fearmongering served it purpose, boosted the GDP figures to help hide the true cost of the so called austerity.



Correct.


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
Doom wrote:
taxeman wrote:
Still the fearmongering served it purpose, boosted the GDP figures to help hide the true cost of the so called austerity.



Correct.


Only for as long as it took people to use the contents of their tanks.

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Mon Mar 12, 2012 2:23 pm
Posts: 203
gusmac wrote:
Doom wrote:
taxeman wrote:
Still the fearmongering served it purpose, boosted the GDP figures to help hide the true cost of the so called austerity.



Correct.


Only for as long as it took people to use the contents of their tanks.


Yes I agree, however it served its purpose for the first quarter GDP figures which would of been far worse. This year with the Olymics and Euro football will be somewhat insulted. The last quarter and next year will be the real killer.
Remember there is another 10 billion the government plans to cut, from where who know. The banks are still in major trouble, lequidity issues will continue as banks try to ofset poor derivatives.

As Vince cable wrote a few months back, which was largely overlooked by the media. "Most people have no idea how bad things are going to get"


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 8 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 931 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group