Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 12:44 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 6:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
I can't believe that I missed this one completly, with me being the pedantic one and all that.
Last year when our tariff increase was being debated and voted on, the proposal voted for by a majority of 6-5 after 18 proxy votes were discounted, was a change in the distance of the flag fall from .5 of a mile to .3 of a mile. our running mile at rate 1 is £1.40 so the increase was stated at 28 pence for the whole journey. Are you with me so far? The figures for rate 2,3 and 4 were proposed as follows. 37 pence for the journey at rate 2. 43 pence for the journey at rate 3 and 56 pence for the journey at rate 4. These figures were advertised in the paper alongside the statement " for the first 1/3 mile".
Anyone spotted the problem yet?

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 6:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
I only spotted it when we were having the meters changed this morning. Someone has changed the proposal from .3 of a mile to 1/3 of a mile. The chap from the council, when I pointed it out said that it was the same thing. I told him it wasn't and the diference was 12.5% so we have actually got,
rate 1 is 24.5 pence
rate 2 is 32.4 pence
rate 3 is 37.6 pence
rate 4 is 49 pence
I am not a happy bunny. not happy at all! :evil:

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 7:27 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
grandad wrote:
The chap from the council, when I pointed it out said that it was the same thing.

:lol:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 8:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
Cabbies grandad especially the thickest of the lot bottom of the league more hours for less money than any other worker = PRATTS

Grandad youve just proved it mug !! given your schnide comment on the Group 2 problem not surprised hope you go bust SOON! :D :D :D

Quote" around here you only need one eye" perhaps a Brain cell would help?????????????? :D

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
trotskys twin wrote:
Cabbies grandad especially the thickest of the lot bottom of the league more hours for less money than any other worker = PRATTS

Grandad youve just proved it mug !! given your schnide comment on the Group 2 problem not surprised hope you go bust SOON! :D :D :D

Quote" around here you only need one eye" perhaps a Brain cell would help?????????????? :D

It wasn't a snide comment. we have 2 drivers in our borough that only have one eye. One of them has actually run over 2 pedestrians in the last year and he still has a badge.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 3:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 3:20 pm
Posts: 3272
So you're around 4p per job worse off than you thought you would be? Hardly seems the end of the world.

But it's no wonder your council rely on the meter mob to reset the meters correctly, since they probably wouldn't know how to test them properly anyway by the sounds of it. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 6:39 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Dusty Bin wrote:
So you're around 4p per job worse off than you thought you would be? Hardly seems the end of the world.


With all the increases in fuel, insurance etc. since the last rise 4 years ago, the rise of 28 pence was bad enough. It would have taken over 7,000 journeys at 28p just to make up the loss each year. it will now be nearer 8,000. No one here does anything like that.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 8:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 3:11 pm
Posts: 8119
Location: A Villa in Aston NO MORE!
grandad wrote:
I can't believe that I missed this one completly, with me being the pedantic one and all that.
Last year when our tariff increase was being debated and voted on, the proposal voted for by a majority of 6-5 after 18 proxy votes were discounted, was a change in the distance of the flag fall from .5 of a mile to .3 of a mile. our running mile at rate 1 is £1.40 so the increase was stated at 28 pence for the whole journey. Are you with me so far? The figures for rate 2,3 and 4 were proposed as follows. 37 pence for the journey at rate 2. 43 pence for the journey at rate 3 and 56 pence for the journey at rate 4. These figures were advertised in the paper alongside the statement " for the first 1/3 mile".
Anyone spotted the problem yet?

0.3 of a mile is not 1/3 of a mile, or 1/3 of a mile is actually 0.3333333333333333333333333333333333333 recurring of a mile.

The question is, what were your meters eventually set at?

_________________
Kind regards,

Brummie Cabbie.

Type a message, post your news,
Disagree with other members' views;
But please, do have some decorum,
When debating on the TDO Forum.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 10:14 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Brummie Cabbie wrote:
grandad wrote:
I can't believe that I missed this one completly, with me being the pedantic one and all that.
Last year when our tariff increase was being debated and voted on, the proposal voted for by a majority of 6-5 after 18 proxy votes were discounted, was a change in the distance of the flag fall from .5 of a mile to .3 of a mile. our running mile at rate 1 is £1.40 so the increase was stated at 28 pence for the whole journey. Are you with me so far? The figures for rate 2,3 and 4 were proposed as follows. 37 pence for the journey at rate 2. 43 pence for the journey at rate 3 and 56 pence for the journey at rate 4. These figures were advertised in the paper alongside the statement " for the first 1/3 mile".
Anyone spotted the problem yet?

0.3 of a mile is not 1/3 of a mile, or 1/3 of a mile is actually 0.3333333333333333333333333333333333333 recurring of a mile.

The question is, what were your meters eventually set at?

They were set at 1/3 mile.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 11:42 am 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:20 am
Posts: 2948
Location: Over here!
You must have had the original proposals in the minutes of your application, and then surely it would have been published (under objections) in the press = proof.

If it is not as applied/minuted/published then you have every right to go back to them, as it is flawed.

_________________
if you cannot be yourself, then who can you be.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
The published tariff was in the paper as,
For the first 1/3 mile (increase of 28p over the whole journey)
Nobody spotted that they had put 1/3 and not .3 all anyone looked at was the "increase of 28p over the whole journey".

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 12:55 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 21, 2006 1:20 am
Posts: 2948
Location: Over here!
grandad wrote:
The published tariff was in the paper as,
For the first 1/3 mile (increase of 28p over the whole journey)
Nobody spotted that they had put 1/3 and not .3 all anyone looked at was the "increase of 28p over the whole journey".


And the minutes?

_________________
if you cannot be yourself, then who can you be.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 4:49 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Sep 21, 2010 7:35 pm
Posts: 1855
Our last rise, the first for 4 years was just 10p extra per mile. However the meters only go up in units of 20p so any journey less than two miles costs the same as before the rise.
Unfortunately I'd say only 5% of journeys are two miles or over and 50% go less than a mile ! Even so the rise only covers the same increase in fuel so no rise in profit at all.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 7:01 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
cabby john wrote:
grandad wrote:
The published tariff was in the paper as,
For the first 1/3 mile (increase of 28p over the whole journey)
Nobody spotted that they had put 1/3 and not .3 all anyone looked at was the "increase of 28p over the whole journey".


And the minutes?


they were taken and copies are available from the office..... :lol:

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jun 15, 2012 7:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
cabby john wrote:
grandad wrote:
The published tariff was in the paper as,
For the first 1/3 mile (increase of 28p over the whole journey)
Nobody spotted that they had put 1/3 and not .3 all anyone looked at was the "increase of 28p over the whole journey".


And the minutes?

Good point, I will see if I can get a copy. :wink:

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 26 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 171 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group