captain cab wrote:
Skull wrote:
I like this "cabni****" word. It has a certain ring to it that doesn't leave you guessing what it means to be one.

Yeah, I thought it was racist.
Using a term like "nigger" in the context as a derogatory term about an individual, may well be deemed racist, if applied in the original context of the word and against an individual who takes offence. pwersonally I wouldn't wish to do this.
But here it is appended to another term "cab" and its use is to recognise the low status of those whom it used to describe. And you can't airbrush the discrimination out of history by seeking to sideline the word. It still exists, and it is still horrible. And anyone who feels strongly about being described as a cabni**** can take the matter into court. Given that I would happily describe myself as a cabni**** as recognition of how far down the food chain I feel I am in our modern 21st alleged democracy, I'd happily defend use of the word.
You can't sink lower in status than the slaves of America in the confederate states. Drivers in our PHC and taxi trades have acquired the same lowly status, gifted to them by odious individuals like Dougie.
Like the lowly status where those who are already working 12 hours a day, or more, seven days a week, struggling to survive in the worst recession in modern history, and paying untenably high rentals for the reducing amount of work available to them, and in a system where they are not accorded work on a strictly first come first served basis, have a company's charge on contracts arbitrarily increased from 7 to 10 per cent, and where the legitimate running costs of the company's ownership are thrust upon them at every opportunity.
The company doesn't have to be efficient, cut its cloth according to new economic means, it just hikes its take, knowing full well that the cabni**** have nowhere else to go and will put up with it. And work harder and longer for less, and put public safety in increased danger as a result.
This is the harsh reality of restricting hackneys. The council's policy has allowed the lowest common denominator to rear its ugly head.
And we don't know what the real effect of the policy is, because the question isn't even asked. No records are kept of driver fatigue incidents.
No records, the problem doesn't exist. Like the other incidents which occur because the public have real difficulty hailing a real cab.
Convenient or what?