Private Reggie wrote:
If you want a chance to enlighten us on a better form of regulation for Edinburgh's HC trade then go on Skull, the platform is all yours, remind me again what the plan is
I put my alternative plan to the status quo up for debate, if its ever rejected publicly i will accept that my peers know better, no lifetime mission from me
So lets see how you or Jasbar would improve the regulation of the Edinburgh taxi trade, c'mon Skull or Jasbar the full script as i have already done mine you owe it to the debate

You know two sides to the story, we have one side as an alternative lets hear "it again".
On you go

Its 48 hours and counting, you know you want to but fear it don't you, i feared it but beared it and put it up for scrutiny didn't i
Your turn

Oh and its 2 against 1 (me)
This should be good
Hold the front page will i

Oh dear, now let me, think.

The London model, oh yes that's right.

Quality controls coupled with higher driver and vehicle standards but with no artificial licence plate restriction. Oh and with the same controls applied to the Ph, trade.

This means no one being allowed to do, which is, in effect, the same job, on an equal tariff, and with no real qualifications?
Oh and then there was the point of controlling your own tariff through independent and impartial bodies deciding, what that tariff should be, and without daft councillors having the last say.
Oh and I seem to remember drivers being afforded equal rights, when facing complaints like any other member of the public.
There is more, but I'm just thinking off the top of my head.
Perhaps you would like to give your input Jim? Although, I can appreciate how dealing with feckwits like Dougie, can be extremely tedious, at the very least.
Anyhoo Dougie, it's too late for any of the above. Your trades [edited by admin], and it's only going to get worse.
