swannee wrote:
Jim, There is no argument to lose. If anything the only thing you've lost is the plot!! perhaps it's in your book??
Your use of the word "argument" is wrong because what has been brought up is a set of undeniable facts.
1. You claim to be a published author. (sadly self-published, not ACCEPTED as good enough by a publisher)
2. You write as a lesbian. (based on what? experience??)
3. You have a dangerous predilection for sexial deviancy like rape , sodomy, lesbianism etc.
4 You and Garry have a very special relationship. (this suggests latent homosexuality when coupled with 3 above)
5. You are obsessed with your own importance (despite being the laughing stock of the trade, the council and many other groups.)
I could go on but the above should suffice to make my point.
You truly are a child Swannee.
we're all larfing our heads off at your desperation.
But for a larf let's look at your points?
1. Not a claim, a fact. As for self publishing, well there was a story only yesterday where a self-published author sold 350,000 copies of his first novel on Amazon. Everyone has to start somewhere. I'm not saying my book will sell anything likme this, but it might. Anyway, the clue is in the words "my book". Where's yours?
2. You don't have to be anything to write about it. I've already told you the novel is centred on 3 ladies and is about equality, or the lack of it in our society. You're commenting on a story you haven't even read. Opining without knowledge. But there again, you're just being true to form. Cos that's what you only ever done on these forums. Opining without knowledge.
3. A predilection foe sexial (sic) deviancy? Quality. I didn't rape the two females in Edinburgh who were assaulted because they couldn't get a safe cab home, partly because the council restricts their number to protect bozos like you. And it sticks in your craw that the truth keeps popping up, and will do until the situation is remedied. What sticks in my craw is that I have to share a planet with scum like you who would rather have women harmed rather than lose your vested interest. Shame on you.
4. Yes the Skull and I may well have a special relationship. Intellectually we're on the same wavelength. On matters of policy we have equilibrium. On social conscience we on the same level. We both loathe corrupt vested interests. And we both have a healthy disdain for the taxi trade, and the sheeple in it like you who have held its development nback and allowed the competitor PH to become more powerful than they have a right to.
That you seem so hooked on sexual epithets, as if they would somehow defeat us betrays your lack of any reasoned thinking and questions your sanity. If the cab inspector does anything he should be weeding you out, there's nbo such thing as anonymity on the web, and bringing your rants to the notice of the RC to consider whether you are a fit and proper person to have any contact with the public. Your apparent attempt to use sexual matters so frivolously suggests that you are a danger to the public.
5. Obsessed with my importance? I would suggest you're more obsessed with my importance than anyone. Whatever the trade thinks, and the vast majority of the sheeple don't, the last thing the council will be doing is laughing. They may not like me, but then both they and I don't care about that. What they do know is that we're substantially correct about the issues we've raised. They know where we're heading, they're just experiencing some difficulty decoding how to get there.
You see Swannee, you and your ilk are commercial dinosaurs. We know that de-restriction will weed the chaff like you out. because you are commercially incompetent. You couldn't survive in an equal and fair free market on your best day.
But keep your rants coming. They are at least entertaining
Login
Register
FAQ
