Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 2:01 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
City landlords fined total of £23,000 over squalid homes



LANDLORDS who left homes mouldy, rotten, cockroach-infested and crammed with tenants have been fined more than £23,000.

Oxford City Council has released pictures of three different properties in the city after their owners were prosecuted.

In one of the homes, 10 tenants are thought to have been living in squalid conditions.

Council officers visited the properties, all in East Oxford and Cowley, in April and May following complaints from the public.

The three landlords pleaded guilty to 34 offences between them and were sentenced at Oxford Magistrates’ Court in the last week.

Imran Hussain Ali, owner of 394 Cowley Road, was fined £9,266 after pleading guilty to 11 offences.

The 33-year-old, who lives at another address in Cowley Road , told council officers he did not know how many tenants occupied the house.

But they found evidence that it was occupied by at least 10 people following an inspection, the court heard.

There was no working fire detector, the electrics were in a “poor condition”, a fridge freezer was blocking the front door, the bathroom was filthy and in poor repair and in the kitchen only one ring was working on the cooker, which was coated in dirt and grease.

Cockroaches were also spotted throughout the property, indicating a heavy infestation.

Rizwan Sultan, of Rymers Lane, was fined £8,908 after pleading guilty to 13 offences relating to 24 Wilkins Road.

Officers visited the house in May in response to a complaint and found it occupied by a family of four and two other tenants.

The court heard that Mr Sultan could not provide any gas or electrical safety certificates and the house was in general disrepair with numerous rotted window frames and smashed windows, damaged door frames, a badly repaired kitchen ceiling, unsafe electrics, a fridge in the way of the front door and the bathroom in a poor state of repair.

He was previously convicted in 2008 for similar offences.

Barbur Ali, 29 of Lytton Road, was fined £5,250 after pleading guilty to 10 offences under the Housing Act 2004.

Officers visited his property at 33 Warwick Street in May and found nine adults and a child living there.

They found inadequate fire precautions, the smoke detector was broken, the cooker obstructed the washing machine and piles of rubbish had built up because there weren’t enough bins.

The latest successful prosecutions take the total number of landlords fined under a new council scheme to 31.

More than £50,000 in fines has been handed out by the courts since the compulsory licensing of Houses of Multiple Occupation began in 2011.

After the hearing, the Oxford Mail visited all three properties but there was no answer at any.

Neither Barbur Ali or Imran Ali were available at their home addresses. Mr Sultan, a private hire driver, declined to comment.

Speaking after the hearing, a Warwick Street resident said she felt sorry for the tenants, who she described as “good neighbours”.

The woman, who did not wish to be named, said: “I have no problem with them, they’re great, but I think they’re struggling because their landlord is irresponsible.”

City council deputy leader Ed Turner said: “I’m delighted that the magistrates have sent out such a tough warning to the minority of landlords in Oxford who flout the law.risk.”

Ray Baxter, the HMO licensing officer for the city council, said: “I’m pleased the courts are recognising the work we’re doing.”

http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/yourto ... lid_homes/

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Dec 12, 2012 6:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
Quote:
Barbur Ali, 29 of Lytton Road, was fined £5,250 after pleading guilty to 10 offences under the Housing Act 2004.


surely thats Ali Baba?

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:57 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
Thatcherism at its best whats the betting most of the tenants are on benefits :?: :?: :?: :?: Funny their capping benfits or removing them but never address excessive rents which of course if the tenants are on benefits means that we the TAX payers are subsidising these landlords wunderbar :D :D

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 6:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
If this guy was convicted in 2008 - how come he has a PH license?

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
If this guy was convicted in 2008 - how come he has a PH license?

Gutless councils and gutless lawyers working for them.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 10:55 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20863
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
If they allow murderers, sex offenders, kidnappers etc. a badge they can hardly say no to a bad landlord

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 11:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
edders23 wrote:
If they


'They' are you :sad:

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:53 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 7:33 pm
Posts: 1117
Location: City of dreaming spires
the thing is they are saying that you have to be a fit and proper person to get this hmo license, now we are hearing about people who are losing thier ph license because they are bad land lords,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:08 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
187ums wrote:
the thing is they are saying that you have to be a fit and proper person to get this hmo license, now we are hearing about people who are losing thier ph license because they are bad land lords,


Their committing criminal offences arnt they :?: :?:

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 7:33 pm
Posts: 1117
Location: City of dreaming spires
only oxford and bristol have this hmo nonsense, its nothing more than revenue raising.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
187ums wrote:
its nothing more than revenue raising.


Is it?
Nothing to do with stopping greedy shitbags packing people into unfit and unsafe accomodation like sardines and making a fortune off the state for it? :roll:

BTW we've had HMO rules is Scotland for many years.

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
187ums wrote:
only oxford and bristol have this hmo nonsense, its nothing more than revenue raising.




About time all councils did it, this specimen was putting peoples lives at risk for money off the state just the sort you need in the industry eh 187 ums #-o #-o #-o

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 4:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 7:33 pm
Posts: 1117
Location: City of dreaming spires
its a heavy fine mind you, you dont even get that for touting offences, but still its all about revenue raising guys..


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 5:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
187ums wrote:
its a heavy fine mind you, you dont even get that for touting offences, but still its all about revenue raising guys..


Believe that if you like. Others know different. 8)

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 15, 2012 6:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Thu May 26, 2005 7:33 pm
Posts: 1117
Location: City of dreaming spires
http://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/101106 ... _licences/

this is another example of how desperate they are for more revenue.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 15 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 196 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group