Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Mon May 04, 2026 6:37 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57358
Location: 1066 Country
Brierfield taxi driver wrongly accused of sex assault tells of relief his ordeal is over

A TAXI driver accused of groping a teenage girl in his cab has spoken of his relief after he was cleared by a jury. Dad-of-six Jamil Iqbal, 40, of Brierfield, had always denied the charge of sexual assault on a 16-year-old girl in April 2010. He described the past two-and-a-half years as a 'nightmare' after he lost his job as a taxi driver and had to borrow money to pay for bills and food.

Mr Iqbal, who has five daughters aged 17, 15, 11, eight and three and a baby son who was born on Christmas Eve, said he now wanted to get his life and licence back. He said: "It’s a relief. It has brought us closer together as a family. It has been a struggle. How many other people out there have been wrongly accused? It was hard to explain to my daughters what was going on, that it was all wrong.

“Everything was upside down. I’m really disappointed that my licence was suspended before I had been in court. “I was always going to see this through, to prove that I hadn’t done it. All of this because someone wouldn’t pay a fare. Why?”

And his wife of 17 years, Najama, 39, a welfare assistant at Walter Street County Primary School, blasted the judicial system for taking so long to clear her husband of the charge. She said: “We just want a normal life back. It was such a relief to see him come home from court.

“I knew if he did something wrong he’d tell me. I knew he was telling the truth. He’s spent two years scared, not sleeping, stressed out. “He was made to feel guilty without any proof. We are well-known in Brierfield and everybody knew about this. “What we went through was horrible. Why did it takes nearly so long, nearly three years?”

Mr Iqbal was alleged by the girl to have put his hand down her top and inside her bra after he picked her up from a pub in Burnley Wood on her 16th birthday on April 7 2010. The complainant told the court that Mr Iqbal, of Humphrey Street, had asked her for a hug, then touched her and she had ‘shoved him off’. According to the girl, who had been celebrating her birthday by drinking cider with her mother, the defendant had then asked her: “Can I touch you one more time, please?” and told her: “I have a nice body.”

Giving evidence, Mr Iqbal responded to those claims by telling the jury that the girl had been in the back of the vehicle, had leant forward into the front, and he had pushed her back gently on the shoulder. Mr Iqbal, who was working for Crown Taxis at the time and has no criminal convictions, was found not guilty by the jury last Thursday, and was discharged from the dock by Judge Simon Newell.

Mr Iqbal’s barrister, Simeon Evans, said Mr Iqbal was a man of good character and that there had never been a complaint made against him during his eight years as a taxi driver. He added that the job was Mr Iqbal's only income and he would have been taking ‘an enormous risk’ if the girl’s claims were true. Mr Evans said: “This was a drunken, giggly girl, behaving in a silly way. He pushed her away.”

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 8:59 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Sussex wrote:
on her 16th birthday on April 7 2010. the girl, who had been celebrating her birthday by drinking cider with her mother

That about sums things up.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 3:46 pm
Posts: 175
Sussex wrote:
Brierfield taxi driver wrongly accused of sex assault tells of relief his ordeal is over

A TAXI driver accused of groping a teenage girl in his cab has spoken of his relief after he was cleared by a jury. Dad-of-six Jamil Iqbal, 40, of Brierfield, had always denied the charge of sexual assault on a 16-year-old girl in April 2010. He described the past two-and-a-half years as a 'nightmare' after he lost his job as a taxi driver and had to borrow money to pay for bills and food.

Mr Iqbal, who has five daughters aged 17, 15, 11, eight and three and a baby son who was born on Christmas Eve, said he now wanted to get his life and licence back. He said: "It’s a relief. It has brought us closer together as a family. It has been a struggle. How many other people out there have been wrongly accused? It was hard to explain to my daughters what was going on, that it was all wrong.

“Everything was upside down. I’m really disappointed that my licence was suspended before I had been in court. “I was always going to see this through, to prove that I hadn’t done it. All of this because someone wouldn’t pay a fare. Why?”

And his wife of 17 years, Najama, 39, a welfare assistant at Walter Street County Primary School, blasted the judicial system for taking so long to clear her husband of the charge. She said: “We just want a normal life back. It was such a relief to see him come home from court.

“I knew if he did something wrong he’d tell me. I knew he was telling the truth. He’s spent two years scared, not sleeping, stressed out. “He was made to feel guilty without any proof. We are well-known in Brierfield and everybody knew about this. “What we went through was horrible. Why did it takes nearly so long, nearly three years?”

Mr Iqbal was alleged by the girl to have put his hand down her top and inside her bra after he picked her up from a pub in Burnley Wood on her 16th birthday on April 7 2010. The complainant told the court that Mr Iqbal, of Humphrey Street, had asked her for a hug, then touched her and she had ‘shoved him off’. According to the girl, who had been celebrating her birthday by drinking cider with her mother, the defendant had then asked her: “Can I touch you one more time, please?” and told her: “I have a nice body.”

Giving evidence, Mr Iqbal responded to those claims by telling the jury that the girl had been in the back of the vehicle, had leant forward into the front, and he had pushed her back gently on the shoulder. Mr Iqbal, who was working for Crown Taxis at the time and has no criminal convictions, was found not guilty by the jury last Thursday, and was discharged from the dock by Judge Simon Newell.

Mr Iqbal’s barrister, Simeon Evans, said Mr Iqbal was a man of good character and that there had never been a complaint made against him during his eight years as a taxi driver. He added that the job was Mr Iqbal's only income and he would have been taking ‘an enormous risk’ if the girl’s claims were true. Mr Evans said: “This was a drunken, giggly girl, behaving in a silly way. He pushed her away.”

Why could he not drive for his PH firm? What happened to innocent until proven guilty?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 9:52 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
billybobs wrote:
Sussex wrote:
Brierfield taxi driver wrongly accused of sex assault tells of relief his ordeal is over

A TAXI driver accused of groping a teenage girl in his cab has spoken of his relief after he was cleared by a jury. Dad-of-six Jamil Iqbal, 40, of Brierfield, had always denied the charge of sexual assault on a 16-year-old girl in April 2010. He described the past two-and-a-half years as a 'nightmare' after he lost his job as a taxi driver and had to borrow money to pay for bills and food.

Mr Iqbal, who has five daughters aged 17, 15, 11, eight and three and a baby son who was born on Christmas Eve, said he now wanted to get his life and licence back. He said: "It’s a relief. It has brought us closer together as a family. It has been a struggle. How many other people out there have been wrongly accused? It was hard to explain to my daughters what was going on, that it was all wrong.

“Everything was upside down. I’m really disappointed that my licence was suspended before I had been in court. “I was always going to see this through, to prove that I hadn’t done it. All of this because someone wouldn’t pay a fare. Why?”

And his wife of 17 years, Najama, 39, a welfare assistant at Walter Street County Primary School, blasted the judicial system for taking so long to clear her husband of the charge. She said: “We just want a normal life back. It was such a relief to see him come home from court.

“I knew if he did something wrong he’d tell me. I knew he was telling the truth. He’s spent two years scared, not sleeping, stressed out. “He was made to feel guilty without any proof. We are well-known in Brierfield and everybody knew about this. “What we went through was horrible. Why did it takes nearly so long, nearly three years?”

Mr Iqbal was alleged by the girl to have put his hand down her top and inside her bra after he picked her up from a pub in Burnley Wood on her 16th birthday on April 7 2010. The complainant told the court that Mr Iqbal, of Humphrey Street, had asked her for a hug, then touched her and she had ‘shoved him off’. According to the girl, who had been celebrating her birthday by drinking cider with her mother, the defendant had then asked her: “Can I touch you one more time, please?” and told her: “I have a nice body.”

Giving evidence, Mr Iqbal responded to those claims by telling the jury that the girl had been in the back of the vehicle, had leant forward into the front, and he had pushed her back gently on the shoulder. Mr Iqbal, who was working for Crown Taxis at the time and has no criminal convictions, was found not guilty by the jury last Thursday, and was discharged from the dock by Judge Simon Newell.

Mr Iqbal’s barrister, Simeon Evans, said Mr Iqbal was a man of good character and that there had never been a complaint made against him during his eight years as a taxi driver. He added that the job was Mr Iqbal's only income and he would have been taking ‘an enormous risk’ if the girl’s claims were true. Mr Evans said: “This was a drunken, giggly girl, behaving in a silly way. He pushed her away.”

Why could he not drive for his PH firm? What happened to innocent until proven guilty?

Because drivers who are even thought to have carried out a sexual assult and some other offences can have their badges taken away immediatly until the end of the trial or investigation. There is not even the 21 days to lodge an appeal.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 10:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Nov 12, 2012 11:13 pm
Posts: 435
One of our drivers was accused of a similar thing,he was suspended straight away ,he owned 3 cabs,he had to sell 2 cabs to keep afloat.After a long wait and much stress no evidence was put forward at his trial.All along it had been a dispute over the fare.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 10:54 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jun 06, 2011 10:58 pm
Posts: 302
Claim loss of earnings of the council/police.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2013 11:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
andycable wrote:
Claim loss of earnings of the council/police.


I don't think that's possible. At the end of the day the council have to protect the public so they have to suspend the licence or put the public at risk

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 6:19 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
toots wrote:
andycable wrote:
Claim loss of earnings of the council/police.


I don't think that's possible. At the end of the day the council have to protect the public so they have to suspend the licence or put the public at risk

Unfortunatly this is the case. The only person that can be claimed against is the girl and because of her age that may not be possible either.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 8:50 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57358
Location: 1066 Country
billybobs wrote:
Why could he not drive for his PH firm? What happened to innocent until proven guilty?

Because his council thought otherwise.

The law changed about 6 years ago, previous to that he would have been allowed to work.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 10:32 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 2406
Is there no way to claim loss of earnings if found not guilty ? It seems unfair you could be out of work on someones malocious accusation,which would be easy to do in a taxi.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 11:09 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
blackpool wrote:
Is there no way to claim loss of earnings if found not guilty ? It seems unfair you could be out of work on someones malocious accusation,which would be easy to do in a taxi.

Who are you going to claim against? As I said in a previous post, the omly person to claim against would be the girl and because of her age it is unlikly that she could be made to pay.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 08, 2013 8:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57358
Location: 1066 Country
blackpool wrote:
Is there no way to claim loss of earnings if found not guilty ? It seems unfair you could be out of work on someones malocious accusation,which would be easy to do in a taxi.

It's shocking that innocent drivers have their lives wrecked, but the council were acting within the law. :sad:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 735 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group