Blueknight wrote:
It also appreciated the nature of the problem and the special vulnerability of some taxi passengers. “It may be that…there is scope for a more targeted scheme involving audio-recording based on times of day, types of customer (for example, children or vulnerable adults carried under contract between a taxi firm and the council), the use of panic buttons or a combination thereof, which strikes a better balance between the competing considerations and does not contravene the Data Protection and Human Rights Acts.”
Who is more vulnerable?
The special needs clients who have booked worked using the same drivers year in year out, or the pi**ed up young lady wearing next to nothing late at night?
