Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 08, 2026 12:59 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Wokingham: Public consultation on taxi surcharge cut


Plans to cut a hefty surcharge on large groups taking taxis will go to public consultation.

The borough council’s licensing and appeals committee voted on Monday to consult passengers on a move to slash a 50 per cent surcharge for five or more passengers.

But cabbies predict drivers will refuse to pick up more than four people if the surcharge is changed.

The proposed change would scrap the surcharge for groups larger than four, to a set fee of 50p per person.

Committee chairman Cllr Patman said: “We want to hear from the public to see if they are happy to pay a 50 per cent surcharge.”

The committee consulted with the borough’s 101 Hackney Carriage drivers after voting in favour of the change in January.

Just over a third of the drivers responded – 15 called for no change and 19 suggested saloon cars should be reintroduced.

Taxi driver Imran Hussain said: “If they do away with these tariffs there would be no financial incentive to own or run a large vehicle.

“It’s good that it’s gone to public consultation because there’s some transparency but how many members of the public really understand the tariff structure?

“If you compare our price structure to others, our customers have a good deal.”

Mr Hussain estimates larger vehicles cost an extra £3,000 to £4,000 per year in extra road tax, insurance and costs.

source: http://www.getwokingham.co.uk/news/s/21 ... harge_cut_

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Quote:
Mr Hussain estimates larger vehicles cost an extra £3,000 to £4,000 per year in extra road tax, insurance and costs.


If that is the case then surely evidence can be produced of such extras? I appreciate that a tariff of only 50% extra is saving the customers in larger groups 50% but is it really justified.

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 12:13 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
toots wrote:
is it really justified.

Yes!

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 1:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20872
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
grandad wrote:
toots wrote:
is it really justified.

Yes!



=D> =D> =D> =D>

And toots you try running an 8 seater and see where the money goes fuel consumption 10 to 15 % higher than a saloon car road tax £300 a year insurance about 30 to 40 % more than a saloon car and garage bills up to 300% more than a saloon car :sad:

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 3:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
edders23 wrote:
grandad wrote:
toots wrote:
is it really justified.

Yes!



=D> =D> =D> =D>

And toots you try running an 8 seater and see where the money goes fuel consumption 10 to 15 % higher than a saloon car road tax £300 a year insurance about 30 to 40 % more than a saloon car and garage bills up to 300% more than a saloon car :sad:


The fuel consumption is 15% more so that warrants a 50% surcharge? The garage bills are what they are regardless to the amount of passengers in the vehicle so does that warrant a 50% surcharge. Most drivers I know that drive the bigger vehicles do so to get the 50% surcharge and their attitude is that they are saving the customer 50% on fares because they don't have to get two saloons, so you'll have to excuse me for being cynical :wink:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 3:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
toots wrote:
edders23 wrote:


And toots you try running an 8 seater and see where the money goes fuel consumption 10 to 15 % higher than a saloon car road tax £300 a year insurance about 30 to 40 % more than a saloon car and garage bills up to 300% more than a saloon car :sad:


The fuel consumption is 15% more so that warrants a 50% surcharge? The garage bills are what they are regardless to the amount of passengers in the vehicle so does that warrant a 50% surcharge. Most drivers I know that drive the bigger vehicles do so to get the 50% surcharge and their attitude is that they are saving the customer 50% on fares because they don't have to get two saloons, so you'll have to excuse me for being cynical :wink:

Of course the purchase price and depriciation are higher.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 4:05 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
grandad wrote:
toots wrote:
edders23 wrote:


And toots you try running an 8 seater and see where the money goes fuel consumption 10 to 15 % higher than a saloon car road tax £300 a year insurance about 30 to 40 % more than a saloon car and garage bills up to 300% more than a saloon car :sad:


The fuel consumption is 15% more so that warrants a 50% surcharge? The garage bills are what they are regardless to the amount of passengers in the vehicle so does that warrant a 50% surcharge. Most drivers I know that drive the bigger vehicles do so to get the 50% surcharge and their attitude is that they are saving the customer 50% on fares because they don't have to get two saloons, so you'll have to excuse me for being cynical :wink:

Of course the purchase price and depriciation are higher.


Are they? That aside there is a choice is there not :wink:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 9:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57377
Location: 1066 Country
I think the extra % is fully justified.

However I think it is also a temptation to rip off groups of less than five.

Well it is down here. :sad:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 13, 2013 11:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Sussex wrote:
I think the extra % is fully justified.

However I think it is also a temptation to rip off groups of less than five.

Well it is down here. :sad:


I agree that there is justification for an extra %, I'm just not convinced that it should be 50%

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 12:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Why - the vehicles were invariably bought for an advantage i.e. airport runs etc. tough titty imo

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 12:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
captain cab wrote:
Why - the vehicles were invariably bought for an advantage i.e. airport runs etc. tough titty imo


I think the advantage in most areas will be the extra % charged :wink:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 12:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
toots wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Why - the vehicles were invariably bought for an advantage i.e. airport runs etc. tough titty imo


I think the advantage in most areas will be the extra % charged :wink:



yes - whilst a saloon car takes 4 passengers the 8 seater takes more - they're sourced on ranks - as opposed to all vehicles having 4 seats and passengers hiring two cabs - makes sense - except when you've sat in a dereg area for 1 hour waiting for a job.

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 14, 2013 11:01 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
We have fare and a half for all the 6 to 8 seaters


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 507 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group