Jasbar wrote:
What's happening with ECPH's writ against Central?
There seems no doubt it was served. And, according to fat Boab, served on the committee before the AGM.
And, again it is reported that the committee denied receiving it at the AGM, and were therefore re-elected on the principle of its non arrival.
So, we're now presumably in the court process.
CRT defend against it, then they must be prepared to lead evidence and cite witness to prove their premise.
ECPH would have to defend this, and allow witnesses to testify under oath. They would have to answer the questions asked. That would be interesting.
And if the case was suddenly and mysterious pulled, under the guise of a deal being done behind closed doors, then wouldn't the public at large, and presumably the business community too, be entitled to assume that the smoke did mean fire and the allegations were true?
Anyone not larfing their cork off at how to opponents are entertaining us?
So, let's get back on track.
Fat Boab, who appears suspiciously like scumbag Coolky, was obviously doing his best to deflect the question. But here it is again.
So, let's have the answer. If ECPH don't pursue the writ to the fullest extent of the Law, can't we all assume that what Central's committee wonderboys claimed about them is true?
And if the wonderboys do apologise, will the stupid central owners allow them to continue in office?
