Artur and molshy wrote:
Skull wrote:
I've got a question for you Artur: Why are owners/plate holders against de-restriction and your competition, the Ph, is also against de-restriction?
Oh and I'll give you a clue. It has nothing to do with customer service.

Ok I'll indulge you skull.
Plate owners are against de restriction because they have a belief that the value of the plate will fall. (Yes I know you've explained before the council owns the plate).
PH don't want de restriction because it means black cabs can grow in number.
I agree the future for the black cab trade isn't a great one.
There is some truth in what you say.
However, the only reason you have a plate "value" is because drivers are being denied unfettered access to the tools of their trade. No fettering of licenses and there is no one to buy a plate from an "owner." Plates would be worthless.
The Ph doesn't want de-restriction because they need drivers to expand their business, and it's only a cap on taxi numbers that allows this to happen. Ph drivers would migrate to the taxi trade to take advantage of the brief and owning a taxi.
ECPH, need drivers and Taxi owners need drivers and that's where the real "value" lies. You are two sides of the same coin, working to enslave drivers for your own benefit.
Oh and CC, I know eventually that Ph, might start growing again after the playing field leveled somewhat, but the "value" is in the driver.
The last time Edinburgh de-restricted, what Ph drivers there were, made the jump to driving a taxi. Now just think what would happen to Edinburgh Airport if that were to happen. It wouldn't be in the hands of Ph for long, that's for sure.

Oh and I should point out, when I started driving it was a de-restricted market, and Ph was virtually nonexistent.
