Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun May 03, 2026 3:34 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 10:06 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Calls in Rugby to put CCTV in all taxis



TAXIS in the borough could all be fitted with CCTV cameras in a crackdown on crime.

Rugby Hackney Owners Drivers Association (RHODA) has appealed to borough council licensing bosses to make it mandatory for taxis to carry recording equipment.

It would apply to both hackney carriages and private taxis and would cost between £500 and £1,000 to install in each car.

A few of the borough's taxis already have CCTV installed, but council chiefs want to see them in all 166 licensed cabs.

The Government's Department for Transport supports the use of CCTV in taxis, although has not yet made it compulsory.

A report to the borough council's licensing committee said: "Whilst CCTV can assist in the prevention of crime and disorder and can be a useful tool when investigating offences, the issue of making CCTV compulsory in licensed vehicles must be carefully considered.

"The public must have confidence surveillance is appropriate and proportionate. There must also be appropriate privacy safeguards about data protection.

"There is a risk images taken in a licensed hackney or private hire vehicle may be misused by drivers or operators."

It would be up to the taxi's owner to ensure the system used did not breach data protection laws, and signs would have to be put up informing passengers they were being recorded.

Where crimes were committed, police would have the power to seize and view CCTV footage as part of an investigation.

Audio recording would not be permitted as it is deemed to pose a greater risk where data protection laws are concerned.

A consultation on the proposal will now be launched, taking in the views of taxi drivers, the public, police and others before it goes ahead.

The report said: "The consultation exercise will provide the licensed trade with an opportunity to make their views known and will ensure that the whole process is fair and transparent."


Read more: http://www.therugbyobserver.co.uk/2013/ ... 68615.html

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 7:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
Audio recording would not be permitted as it is deemed to pose a greater risk where data protection laws are concerned.

Another clueless council.

Taxi/PH CCTV must have audio to work properly.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Apr 20, 2013 8:57 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 11:02 am
Posts: 180
Location: Brighton
Sussex wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Audio recording would not be permitted as it is deemed to pose a greater risk where data protection laws are concerned.

Another clueless council.

Taxi/PH CCTV must have audio to work properly.

Have you got yours enabled Mark? I haven't!

_________________
42 years now! and still going strong!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 5:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
Skiman wrote:
Have you got yours enabled Mark? I haven't!

Oh yes, and I think those that haven't are a tad silly.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Apr 21, 2013 6:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Nov 23, 2003 11:02 am
Posts: 180
Location: Brighton
Skiman wrote:
Sussex wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Audio recording would not be permitted as it is deemed to pose a greater risk where data protection laws are concerned.

Another clueless council.

Taxi/PH CCTV must have audio to work properly.

Have you got yours enabled Mark? I haven't!

Can JD change mine??

_________________
42 years now! and still going strong!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 8:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
Skiman wrote:
Can JD change mine??

Yes, should take about a minute.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 8:09 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
I thought that one of the government bodies said you can have CCTV in your cab as long as there is no audio


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 8:14 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
skippy41 wrote:
I thought that one of the government bodies said you can have CCTV in your cab as long as there is no audio

And the data controller can allow audio if he thinks it's useful. :wink:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 22, 2013 8:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Sussex wrote:
And the data controller can allow audio if he thinks it's useful. :wink:



:lol:

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 3:45 am 
Sussex wrote:
skippy41 wrote:
I thought that one of the government bodies said you can have CCTV in your cab as long as there is no audio

And the data controller can allow audio if he thinks it's useful. :wink:

If the data controller did, and was reported to ICO, or to his LO quoting ICO guidelines...what then?


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 7:02 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57356
Location: 1066 Country
Gobby wrote:
If the data controller did, and was reported to ICO, or to his LO quoting ICO guidelines...what then?

He could be reported, but as he is following ICO guidance, it would be a tad silly.

I suggest you stop listening to idiots.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Apr 23, 2013 10:25 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Sussex wrote:
Gobby wrote:
If the data controller did, and was reported to ICO, or to his LO quoting ICO guidelines...what then?

He could be reported, but as he is following ICO guidance, it would be a tad silly.

Quote:
I suggest you stop listening to idiots
.


The ICO can read Sussex :wink: :badgrin:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 7:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Calls to put CCTV in all taxis


TAXIS in the borough could all be fitted with CCTV cameras in a crackdown on crime.

Rugby Hackney Owners Drivers Association (RHODA) has appealed to borough council licensing bosses to make it mandatory for taxis to carry recording equipment.

It would apply to both hackney carriages and private taxis and would cost between £500 and £1,000 to install in each car.

A few of the borough's taxis already have CCTV installed, but council chiefs want to see them in all 166 licensed cabs.

The Government's Department for Transport supports the use of CCTV in taxis, although has not yet made it compulsory.

A report to the borough council's licensing committee said: "Whilst CCTV can assist in the prevention of crime and disorder and can be a useful tool when investigating offences, the issue of making CCTV compulsory in licensed vehicles must be carefully considered.

"The public must have confidence surveillance is appropriate and proportionate. There must also be appropriate privacy safeguards about data protection.

"There is a risk images taken in a licensed hackney or private hire vehicle may be misused by drivers or operators."

It would be up to the taxi's owner to ensure the system used did not breach data protection laws, and signs would have to be put up informing passengers they were being recorded.

Where crimes were committed, police would have the power to seize and view CCTV footage as part of an investigation.

Audio recording would not be permitted as it is deemed to pose a greater risk where data protection laws are concerned.

A consultation on the proposal will now be launched, taking in the views of taxi drivers, the public, police and others before it goes ahead.

The report said: "The consultation exercise will provide the licensed trade with an opportunity to make their views known and will ensure that the whole process is fair and transparent."


Read more: http://www.therugbyobserver.co.uk/2013/ ... 68615.html

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 13 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 723 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group