Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 12:41 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 11:33 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
roythebus wrote:
Back to the original post, this link has cropped up following a local council meeting at which a spokeswoman from this outfit gave a presentation:

http://volunteershepway.co.uk/index.php ... 5&Itemid=6

Drivers get 45p/mile from home to venue, wait and return; they don't need any additional licences; no H&R insurance; no additional safety checks; they have over 700 clients who make over 10,000 journeys a year, and they're doing the local licenced trade out of all this work. :evil: :evil: :evil:

THAT, my friends, is the extent of the problem in my area alone. Multiply that by the amount of voluntary car schemes in the country and it is a huge dent in our incomes. But then with the prices some of the licenced trade charges, they might be better going on one of these schemes, at least they'd get more per mile than they do for airport runs @ 40p a mile. 8)

All the while there's mugs out there who are prepared to work for nothing, the government will benefit from it by not having to pay the real price for services, yet will quite happily reduce the benefits of those volunteers and increase their taxes, either directly or indirectly. They must be total mugs for doing it.


=D>

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 12:16 pm 
roythebus wrote:
Back to the original post, this link has cropped up following a local council meeting at which a spokeswoman from this outfit gave a presentation:

http://volunteershepway.co.uk/index.php ... 5&Itemid=6

Drivers get 45p/mile from home to venue, wait and return; they don't need any additional licences; no H&R insurance; no additional safety checks; they have over 700 clients who make over 10,000 journeys a year, and they're doing the local licenced trade out of all this work. :evil: :evil: :evil:

THAT, my friends, is the extent of the problem in my area alone. Multiply that by the amount of voluntary car schemes in the country and it is a huge dent in our incomes. But then with the prices some of the licenced trade charges, they might be better going on one of these schemes, at least they'd get more per mile than they do for airport runs @ 40p a mile. 8)

All the while there's mugs out there who are prepared to work for nothing, the government will benefit from it by not having to pay the real price for services, yet will quite happily reduce the benefits of those volunteers and increase their taxes, either directly or indirectly. They must be total mugs for doing it.

You will notice that these groups of volunteer drivers are more often than not a closed shop of ex police, council and health workers-"never had it so good" one confided in me once!


Top
  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 29, 2008 4:06 pm
Posts: 24391
Location: Twixt Heaven and Hell, but nearest Hell
and ive never seen headlines like "unbadged Community Transport driver raped girl"

_________________
Of all the things ive lost, i miss my mind the most


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 05, 2013 10:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 11:17 pm
Posts: 2712
Would you fancy raping an 80 year-old? :shock: :lol:

Some of the voluntary drivers round here are 70+ and would be unlikely to pass a cab medical; same with their cars, usually 15 y/o wrecks that have rarely been serviced.

Seriously though, with the amount of jobs this lot are doing, average 27 jobs a day every day of the year, that's quite a few cabbies they're not helping. Bear in mind too my local wrinkly centre runs 2 minibuses @ £5 a journey, 2 trips am and pm, that's about £72k a year per minibus. CT section 19 permits are supposed to be for those whose principal business is not passenger transport! I reckon £144k is a good portion of their income and ought to be PSV licenced.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
roythebus wrote:
Would you fancy raping an 80 year-old? : SOME DO

Some of the voluntary drivers round here are 70+ and would be unlikely to pass a cab medical; same with their cars, usually 15 y/o wrecks that have rarely been serviced.

Seriously though, with the amount of jobs this lot are doing, average 27 jobs a day every day of the year, that's quite a few cabbies they're not helping. Bear in mind too my local wrinkly centre runs 2 minibuses @ £5 a journey, 2 trips am and pm, that's about £72k a year per minibus. CT section 19 permits are supposed to be for those whose principal business is not passenger transport! I reckon £144k is a good portion of their income and ought to be PSV licenced.


AND WHAT ARE YOU DOING ABOUT IT :?: :?: MAYBE MRS ROY CAN INTERVENE THROUGH FELLOW CLLRS :?:

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 06, 2013 11:32 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 11:17 pm
Posts: 2712
It was mrsRoy who alerted me to this following a chat at the town council meeting from the volunteer group who help with the local libraries. The woman got onto what else they do, including CT.

The trouble is it was getting late, mrsR was tired and had she asked what she wanted to could have been accused of a conflict of interest. However, I will be doing the FoI on her behalf! 8)


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 07, 2013 11:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
roythebus wrote:
It was mrsRoy who alerted me to this following a chat at the town council meeting from the volunteer group who help with the local libraries. The woman got onto what else they do, including CT.

The trouble is it was getting late, mrsR was tired and had she asked what she wanted to could have been accused of a conflict of interest. However, I will be doing the FoI on her behalf! 8)


Good sort the barstewards :badgrin: :badgrin: and to others theres an example of what can be initiated what you WAITING for :?: :?: :?:

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 7:48 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 11:17 pm
Posts: 2712
Well, to re-open this thread, I've just had a lengthy chat with Martin of MC Cars in Mansfield following a letter I've had published in routeOne bus trade mag this week. In that letter, I mentioned the fact that CT groups were exempt from various licencing regs which I mentioned earlier in this thread.

Martin has put a substantial amount of his own money taking this case to the EU and a judgement is due later this month. there has already been some movement regarding CT bus drivers. It has been deemed that they WILL need D1 entitlement and a Driver CPC to carry on driving over 8 passenger seat vehicles. I understand that VOSA will be at a lot of schools from 10th September when the CPC rules kick in. Basically any CT driver who does not have the CPC card will have a PG9 (immediate prohibition) issued on the vehicle and he will receive a hefty fine, as will the CT operator.

Various other matters were discussed; I wondered how this will affect the ph/taxi trade with community transport cars. The EU ruling, if it goes in "our" favour, and there is a very strong likelihood of that as the EU is against government subsidies, will mean that most "voluntary" groups offering cheap hospital trips will be outlawed. This is based on the premise that if a CT bus driver needs a D1 plus CPC as he's driving for hire and reward, a car driver, doing cheap hospital trips (for hire and reward) will need a ph or taxi licence and be properly licenced. (See Rout v Swallow Hotel for the link on that matter!)

Excrement is likely to hit the air circulation equipment fairly soon, and the government will have to rethink its transport policies.

What has further angered the EU is the fact that Hackney Community Transport (turnover £50m+) recently tendered and was awarded the contract to run all the buses in Jersey, having ousted the previous French-owned company. HCT receives a hefty government subsidy for its operations.

No doubt further clarification will appear soon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 9:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
roythebus wrote:
Well, to re-open this thread, I've just had a lengthy chat with Martin of MC Cars in Mansfield following a letter I've had published in routeOne bus trade mag this week. In that letter, I mentioned the fact that CT groups were exempt from various licencing regs which I mentioned earlier in this thread.

Martin has put a substantial amount of his own money taking this case to the EU and a judgement is due later this month. there has already been some movement regarding CT bus drivers. It has been deemed that they WILL need D1 entitlement and a Driver CPC to carry on driving over 8 passenger seat vehicles. I understand that VOSA will be at a lot of schools from 10th September when the CPC rules kick in. Basically any CT driver who does not have the CPC card will have a PG9 (immediate prohibition) issued on the vehicle and he will receive a hefty fine, as will the CT operator.

Various other matters were discussed; I wondered how this will affect the ph/taxi trade with community transport cars. The EU ruling, if it goes in "our" favour, and there is a very strong likelihood of that as the EU is against government subsidies, will mean that most "voluntary" groups offering cheap hospital trips will be outlawed. This is based on the premise that if a CT bus driver needs a D1 plus CPC as he's driving for hire and reward, a car driver, doing cheap hospital trips (for hire and reward) will need a ph or taxi licence and be properly licenced. (See Rout v Swallow Hotel for the link on that matter!)

Excrement is likely to hit the air circulation equipment fairly soon, and the government will have to rethink its transport policies.

What has further angered the EU is the fact that Hackney Community Transport (turnover £50m+) recently tendered and was awarded the contract to run all the buses in Jersey, having ousted the previous French-owned company. HCT receives a hefty government subsidy for its operations.

No doubt further clarification will appear soon.

Grandma, alias mrs grandad has just completed her Periodic CPC and whilst on the course one of the instructors mentioned about VOSA being out from September. he also said that at the time she was taking her training only 11% of bus drivers had completed the CPC training. Should be quite interesting come September.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 10:00 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 9170
grandad wrote:
roythebus wrote:
Well, to re-open this thread, I've just had a lengthy chat with Martin of MC Cars in Mansfield following a letter I've had published in routeOne bus trade mag this week. In that letter, I mentioned the fact that CT groups were exempt from various licencing regs which I mentioned earlier in this thread.

Martin has put a substantial amount of his own money taking this case to the EU and a judgement is due later this month. there has already been some movement regarding CT bus drivers. It has been deemed that they WILL need D1 entitlement and a Driver CPC to carry on driving over 8 passenger seat vehicles. I understand that VOSA will be at a lot of schools from 10th September when the CPC rules kick in. Basically any CT driver who does not have the CPC card will have a PG9 (immediate prohibition) issued on the vehicle and he will receive a hefty fine, as will the CT operator.

Various other matters were discussed; I wondered how this will affect the ph/taxi trade with community transport cars. The EU ruling, if it goes in "our" favour, and there is a very strong likelihood of that as the EU is against government subsidies, will mean that most "voluntary" groups offering cheap hospital trips will be outlawed. This is based on the premise that if a CT bus driver needs a D1 plus CPC as he's driving for hire and reward, a car driver, doing cheap hospital trips (for hire and reward) will need a ph or taxi licence and be properly licenced. (See Rout v Swallow Hotel for the link on that matter!)

Excrement is likely to hit the air circulation equipment fairly soon, and the government will have to rethink its transport policies.

What has further angered the EU is the fact that Hackney Community Transport (turnover £50m+) recently tendered and was awarded the contract to run all the buses in Jersey, having ousted the previous French-owned company. HCT receives a hefty government subsidy for its operations.

No doubt further clarification will appear soon.

Grandma, alias mrs grandad has just completed her Periodic CPC and whilst on the course one of the instructors mentioned about VOSA being out from September. he also said that at the time she was taking her training only 11% of bus drivers had completed the CPC training. Should be quite interesting come September.


The CPC's a bit of a nonsense certificate, You work damned hard and spend a heap of money to Pass your D1 driving test to prove you can drive a Minibus, but but that in itself is no longer enough, so now you have to spend £xxx's of your hard earned just to gain a CPC which is a guaranteed certainty even if you slept through each and every section of it's training itinerary.

That CPC is more about making someone money than it is driver competence.

A fechin pointless certificate which will become a legal requirement...who dreams that guff up? You have your D1 entitlement on your Drivers License but in reality it Isn't an Entitlement at all..It's only half the job.

I dunno whether I should bother with a CPC, I may never need to use it or at worst I can go through it at a date after September as It wont affect my D1 entitlement which will always be on my licence providing I keep passing the Medicals and renewing my Licence periodically.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 10:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 9170
roythebus wrote:
Well, to re-open this thread, I've just had a lengthy chat with Martin of MC Cars in Mansfield following a letter I've had published in routeOne bus trade mag this week. In that letter, I mentioned the fact that CT groups were exempt from various licencing regs which I mentioned earlier in this thread.

Martin has put a substantial amount of his own money taking this case to the EU and a judgement is due later this month. there has already been some movement regarding CT bus drivers. It has been deemed that they WILL need D1 entitlement and a Driver CPC to carry on driving over 8 passenger seat vehicles. I understand that VOSA will be at a lot of schools from 10th September when the CPC rules kick in. Basically any CT driver who does not have the CPC card will have a PG9 (immediate prohibition) issued on the vehicle and he will receive a hefty fine, as will the CT operator.

Various other matters were discussed; I wondered how this will affect the ph/taxi trade with community transport cars. The EU ruling, if it goes in "our" favour, and there is a very strong likelihood of that as the EU is against government subsidies, will mean that most "voluntary" groups offering cheap hospital trips will be outlawed. This is based on the premise that if a CT bus driver needs a D1 plus CPC as he's driving for hire and reward, a car driver, doing cheap hospital trips (for hire and reward) will need a ph or taxi licence and be properly licenced. (See Rout v Swallow Hotel for the link on that matter!)

Excrement is likely to hit the air circulation equipment fairly soon, and the government will have to rethink its transport policies.

What has further angered the EU is the fact that Hackney Community Transport (turnover £50m+) recently tendered and was awarded the contract to run all the buses in Jersey, having ousted the previous French-owned company. HCT receives a hefty government subsidy for its operations.

No doubt further clarification will appear soon.


They should also Clarify what Constitutes a Charity Price per Passenger mile...those Charity Transporters around here state it as being 30pence per mile, what they Don't say though is whether It's 30p per mile per passenger as I Suspect it is. if it were per passenger then it's a game changer because 4 passengers would generate £1.20 PPM income, 8 Passengers would generate £2.40 PPM and a minibus load would generate £4.80 PPM of income,

At these Prices the so called Charity is Charging somewhere between 50% and 300% percent more than we Professionals are charging per passenger mile, this they do mostly without the correct LA or VOSA Driver or Vehicle Licenses being in place, all under the guise of being a charity.

I'm not Even sure many of them are Charities, Someones been putting flyers out around here looking for Volunteer Drivers to assist in their Community transport service and there's no mention of it being a charity and I cant see it on the list of registered charities.

I Emailed them over a week ago for Clarification of both their Charitable Status and of their Pricing structure....so far no response, I wonder why ?

Most of these groups have an Owner more interested in making a Managers salary for themselves as they are about supplying the truly needy, It's time the Government seen through their Scams once and for all, they offer a low level service at over inflated prices and pretend to be loving and caring volunteers..what utter crap.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 10:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
roythebus wrote:
I wondered how this will affect the ph/taxi trade with community transport cars.

If Mr MC Cars wins then I struggle to see any negatives for the taxi/PH trade.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 10:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
roythebus wrote:
It has been deemed that they WILL need D1 entitlement and a Driver CPC to carry on driving over 8 passenger seat vehicles.

It's also worth reminding folks that the LC are recommending that all under 9 seat work is done by taxi/PH. No more small PSV.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed May 01, 2013 11:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 9170
Sussex wrote:
roythebus wrote:
It has been deemed that they WILL need D1 entitlement and a Driver CPC to carry on driving over 8 passenger seat vehicles.

It's also worth reminding folks that the LC are recommending that all under 9 seat work is done by taxi/PH. No more small PSV.


What does that mean?

Every 4 to 8 passenger seat volunter Vehicle will be either PH or Hack? or that no Volunteer using a 4 to 8 seat Vehicle can get away with using their own unlicenced car?

Or does it Simply mean that the Volunteers cant abuse a Vosa operators licence by driving a vehicle with fewer than 8 passenger seats and for which did not require the driver to have a D1 category licence entitlement?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu May 02, 2013 12:00 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 11:17 pm
Posts: 2712
Oi Bloodnock, I happen to be one of those PSV operators who uses an under 9 seater on an O licence, I have written permission from the Traffic Commissioner to do so. Even shearings use under 9 seaters as feeders for their tours.

The CPC is a waste of time and money, another tax on working. From Setptember 10th, no CPC, no drive for hire and reward. It seems the EU commissioner has used Rout v Swallow Hotel to define what is "hire and reward". I have a letter printed in routeOne today asking what is "commercial use" as it has no legal status, hence the lengthy phone call from MCCars this evening.

Anyone caught driving over 8 seats for "hire and reward"WILL be issued an immediate prohibition, will receive a hefty fine and points, and the operator (if a psv) will face a Public Inquiry. The first case has already come before a PI. the operator had not started driver CPC training and as a result lost 50% of his licences as disciplinary action. BE WARNED, the TCs are taking this seriously.

Yes it will mean more business for hackney and ph drivers from September, and those of us with D1 and CPC will be able to command a high price for our services from that day!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 73 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 174 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group