Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 2:23 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 104 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: E-Cig Update
PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 4:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Gobby wrote:
Just Had these responses from LO; So they are now our employers eh? If anyone can identify the 2010 crown court appeal be good to hear from you.

Quote:
For your information in 2010 we had a Crown Court appeal over a driver smoking e cigs in a works vehicle the on the grounds that they were exempt from the legislation. The Judge dismissed the appeal and held that the original conviction at Magistrates was correct in law. The fine and costs for the offence were £1100. Hope this helps.



It doesn't say that it was a taxi driver, just that it was a driver. That would probably mean that it was a council employee in a council vehicle.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: E-Cig Update
PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 4:26 pm 
grandad wrote:
Gobby wrote:
Just Had these responses from LO; So they are now our employers eh? If anyone can identify the 2010 crown court appeal be good to hear from you.

Quote:
For your information in 2010 we had a Crown Court appeal over a driver smoking e cigs in a works vehicle the on the grounds that they were exempt from the legislation. The Judge dismissed the appeal and held that the original conviction at Magistrates was correct in law. The fine and costs for the offence were £1100. Hope this helps.



It doesn't say that it was a taxi driver, just that it was a driver. That would probably mean that it was a council employee in a council vehicle.

Think you are right Grandad or its pure fiction. Response to asking him directly was

Quote:
I don’t have the details anymore but the case was argued on the definition of smoking under Section 1 Health Act 2006 which defines it as "smoking tobacco or anything which contains tobacco, or smoking any other substance", and states that "smoking includes being in possession of lit tobacco or of anything lit which contains tobacco, or being in possession of any other lit substance in a form in which it could be smoked".

There was also reference to smoke, vapour or odour being emitted.

The section where it says employers may allow them to be smoked is wrong and in my view, having had this case in the Crown Court and would need to b challenged further in order have the legislation changed. So until such time as this challenge is made the law is quite clear e cigs are illegal


Sounds like a bit of a smokescreen? :D


Top
  
 
 Post subject: Re: E-Cig Update
PostPosted: Wed Jun 05, 2013 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Email him back and ask why the health authority lets patients use them in hospital beds, in fact all health authorities do


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: E-Cig Update
PostPosted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 12:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Quote:
Dear Sir

Thank you for your e-mail and the information you have provided. May I please take this opportunity to advise you of the following: At a meeting of the Environmental Protection Committee, Members had raised their concerns regarding the use of electronic cigarettes in licensed vehicles and the increasing difficultly this may raise regarding the enforcement of the No Smoking policy in Licensed Vehicles. If using electronic cigarettes or any other cigarette substitute which may be perceived to appear as a cigarette, drivers could put themselves at risk of being accused of smoking, which is not permitted in hackney carriage and private hire vehicles at any time irrespective of whether the vehicle is being used for hire or for private purposes. The consequences of such an accusation are as follows:

The Licensing and Land Charges Manager has the delegated authority to automatically suspend the licence of any licensed hackney carriage/private hire driver found to be smoking in a licensed vehicle if that person admits to the offence when interviewed under caution. The period of suspension shall be one week in all such cases.

Any alleged incident of a licensed hackney carriage/private hire driver smoking in a licensed vehicle where the driver denies the offence during interview under caution be referred to the Licensing and Environmental Health Committee for a decision

If, on the balance of probabilities, the Committee determines that the licensed driver has been smoking in a licensed hackney carriage/private hire vehicle, the Committee reserves the right to impose a period of suspension of two weeks and/or require the licence holder to undertake and successfully complete the approved driver training course.

Any driver whose licence is suspended by the Licensing and Land Charges Manager under delegated powers would of course have the right of appeal against the decision to the Committee. Similarly, with regards to decisions made by the Committee, drivers would also have the usual right of appeal to the Magistrates’ Court

The decision to impose a condition on the use of electronic cigarettes or any other cigarette substitute which may be perceived to appear as a cigarette, is not based on any issues involving heath.

Regards

Stephen Anders
Licensing and Land Charges Manager


What a load of pish


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: E-Cig Update
PostPosted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 12:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
I take it this is from those idiots in St Helens, Skippy?

Unreasonable policy ?
Fettered discretion ?
Failure to treat each case according to it's merits ?

I'm pretty sure a Sheriff would throw this out in Scotland. Not sure about English law. Can they do this?

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: E-Cig Update
PostPosted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:05 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
gusmac wrote:

Unreasonable policy ?
Fettered discretion ?
Failure to treat each case according to it's merits ?

I'm pretty sure a Sheriff would throw this out in Scotland. Not sure about English law. Can they do this?

I Think question 2 and 3 are covered by the policy but question 1 would require a judical review to change. It could be argued that because of the confusion that could be caused the policy is reasonable.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: E-Cig Update
PostPosted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
grandad wrote:
gusmac wrote:

Unreasonable policy ?
Fettered discretion ?
Failure to treat each case according to it's merits ?

I'm pretty sure a Sheriff would throw this out in Scotland. Not sure about English law. Can they do this?

I Think question 2 and 3 are covered by the policy but question 1 would require a judical review to change. It could be argued that because of the confusion that could be caused the policy is reasonable.


If they banned Coca-cola because the driver might be accused of drinking beer, would that be reasonable?

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: E-Cig Update
PostPosted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
gusmac wrote:
grandad wrote:
gusmac wrote:

Unreasonable policy ?
Fettered discretion ?
Failure to treat each case according to it's merits ?

I'm pretty sure a Sheriff would throw this out in Scotland. Not sure about English law. Can they do this?

I Think question 2 and 3 are covered by the policy but question 1 would require a judical review to change. It could be argued that because of the confusion that could be caused the policy is reasonable.


If they banned Coca-cola because the driver might be accused of drinking beer, would that be reasonable?

I didn't say that I agreed with the policy, but a court may agree. Try it and test your defence in the courts.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: E-Cig Update
PostPosted: Thu Jun 27, 2013 1:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
grandad wrote:
I didn't say that I agreed with the policy, but a court may agree. Try it and test your defence in the courts.


If I worked in St Helens, I would :wink:

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: E-Cig Update
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 2:26 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 5:45 pm
Posts: 436
Location: Warrington Cheshire
Is this argument still running; I thought it was resolved ages ago.

A conventional e-cig could easily be mistaken for a real one, so I reckon it’s understandable why they’d want to stop drivers from using them, but from what I read, most tend to use the vapor devices and they could never be confused with a real fag. Their wording “Any other cigarette substitute that could be perceived to appear as a cigarette” surely then cant apply to these devices?

Bill :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: E-Cig Update
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 2:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
Perception is in the eye of the beholder. People will see what they want to see. #-o

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: E-Cig Update
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 4:25 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
bill_datamaster wrote:
so I reckon it’s understandable why they’d want to stop drivers from using them,

Is it understandable Bill?

The offence is smoking a real fag, there is no offence of pretending to, or imitating smoking?

The laws of this land deal with actual offences, councils shouldn't be trying to stop non-offences.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: E-Cig Update
PostPosted: Fri Jun 28, 2013 5:12 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2004 5:45 pm
Posts: 436
Location: Warrington Cheshire
Think you missed my point there. It's only understandable in so much as they probably don't want loads of people wasting their time accusing drivers of having a fag in their vehicle only to be told it was an e cig. It's the same argument that a lot of pubs use, if it looks like a fag then people will think its a fag. At least with the vapor things, you can see exactly what it is.

As was said earlier, some people are just interfering so & so’s with a need to impose their opinions onto others not for any scientific reason but simply because they can.

Bill :)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: E-Cig Update
PostPosted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 12:44 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:44 pm
Posts: 10591
Location: Scotland
Well back in the land of the living,
I went out on a bender yesterday with my brother around Plymouth, in the second last place we went in a member of staff came up and said I could not use my ecig in there, I told him to do one, as they were not illegal, he said He would call the police, I said please do then I will get you lifted for wasting police time, the pub is just round the corner from where Chris the fish ranks on Royal parade, result after telling the twonk to do one, sat there for an hour drinking and vaping away


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: E-Cig Update
PostPosted: Sun Jul 14, 2013 3:46 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
skippy41 wrote:
Well back in the land of the living,
I went out on a bender yesterday with my brother around Plymouth, in the second last place we went in a member of staff came up and said I could not use my ecig in there, I told him to do one, as they were not illegal, he said He would call the police, I said please do then I will get you lifted for wasting police time, the pub is just round the corner from where Chris the fish ranks on Royal parade, result after telling the twonk to do one, sat there for an hour drinking and vaping away


Nice one. :D

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 104 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 529 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group