Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Fri May 01, 2026 12:40 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 9:00 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
Mr madder wrote:
iam going to appeal but is it worth it do you think I have a case ? Thanks in advance

You should appeal to the Magistrates Court, the penalty you have received is not proportionate to the offence, in my opinion.

Contact a good criminal defence lawyer not the bloke who did your mortgage or divorce, or better still go down to your local Magistrate Court and see who's building is nearest to it. I suspect a criminal defence firm is next door.

You need to do it soon to continue working, but stop all the other stuff about how bad the council is etc etc, it will get you nowhere.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:13 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:13 pm
Posts: 13
As stated i give a guide price but i never charge over the meter so i didnt break the rules of a hackney licence but to save a argument i said it could go up too ten if u wanted to go else where but the meter is on distance and the price will be that .if i said its £4 and then once we have gone to there house and the garage and then stopped at a mates and the meter says £9 they then start complaining that i said it would only be £4 regardless if i explain you've gone further so thats whys its more dealing with drunk people isnt the same as a sober one


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 10:48 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 2406
Seems a harsh decision,id definately appeal to magistrate.Personally speaking id never accept or agree with the councils decision on something like this.Far too important a matter for some councillors to make !


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 11:55 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Mr madder wrote:
As stated i give a guide price but i never charge over the meter so i didnt break the rules of a hackney licence but to save a argument i said it could go up too ten if u wanted to go else where but the meter is on distance and the price will be that .if i said its £4 and then once we have gone to there house and the garage and then stopped at a mates and the meter says £9 they then start complaining that i said it would only be £4 regardless if i explain you've gone further so thats whys its more dealing with drunk people isnt the same as a sober one

Actually you didn't state that you give a guide price and then put the meter on, you just said that you quoted £10. :?

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 12:02 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jul 30, 2013 3:13 pm
Posts: 13
grandad wrote:
Mr madder wrote:
As stated i give a guide price but i never charge over the meter so i didnt break the rules of a hackney licence but to save a argument i said it could go up too ten if u wanted to go else where but the meter is on distance and the price will be that .if i said its £4 and then once we have gone to there house and the garage and then stopped at a mates and the meter says £9 they then start complaining that i said it would only be £4 regardless if i explain you've gone further so thats whys its more dealing with drunk people isnt the same as a sober one

Actually you didn't state that you give a guide price and then put the meter on, you just said that you quoted £10. :?


Sorry i didnt explain it properly .day to day i follow all rules i may bend them a bit but dont want the council to have anything on me so like with these i just prepared them for the bill if it isn't the journey they told me but this really isn't the point.the point is the council have used this to discredit me but I didnt do anything wrong as said they got in another taxi so why should this be used to make me look like iam not following rules and trying to rip people off ? :sad:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 12:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 2406
Thats the difference with a court,hearsay isnt relevant.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 12:22 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
blackpool wrote:
Thats the difference with a court,hearsay isnt relevant.



that's sadly incorrect - its a civil case - not criminal.

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 12:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 2406
I stand corrected then,but personally speaking in 5 or 6 times in front of council only one went in my favour,where in the magistrates only one went against me. :D


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 12:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
blackpool wrote:
I stand corrected then,but personally speaking in 5 or 6 times in front of council only one went in my favour,where in the magistrates only one went against me. :D



you stand more chance in a magistrates

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 12:41 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 30, 2009 10:37 pm
Posts: 2406
captain cab wrote:
blackpool wrote:
I stand corrected then,but personally speaking in 5 or 6 times in front of council only one went in my favour,where in the magistrates only one went against me. :D



you stand more chance in a magistrates

Even more in a Crown Court if youve got any money :wink:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 4:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
captain cab wrote:
Mr madder wrote:

Thank you shame i found it in this situation wish i had looked before as the is a whole load of info on here


yeah - the lack of interest in the job generally jumps up and bites people on the backside

its like those meddling unions and associations - they spend thousands of pounds defending cab drivers across the country - yet people don't want to join - go figure.


thats about it i reckon the capt's on the ball lookss like through your cant be bothered ignorance yer in the poo oh well another mug bites the dust :-o

Associations or unions wont bail you out why would they use their members funds to assist a non member when the incident occurred?

Any way theres been plenty of good advice from sussex blackpool and the Capt follow it and heres some from the trot JOIN A UNION =D> =D> =D> AND BE LUCKY :D

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 6:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
blackpool wrote:
Thats the difference with a court,hearsay isnt relevant.

that's sadly incorrect - its a civil case - not criminal.

I'm not sure any of that is an issue in this case, although it could be I suppose.

But the main issue to me is the punishment. Six months ban will not be upheld by the court.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 6:23 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
Mr TT does make a good point in his own interesting way.

I would bet a pound to a penny that if Mr Madder was in a union he wouldn't be currently under threat of a 6 month ban. (and no not a 12 month one instead) 8-[

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 6:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jul 26, 2008 3:22 pm
Posts: 14152
Location: Wirral
Sussex wrote:
Mr TT does make a good point in his own interesting way.

I would bet a pound to a penny that if Mr Madder was in a union he wouldn't be currently under threat of a 6 month ban. (and no not a 12 month one instead) 8-[


I would bet a pound to a penny that if Mr Madder obtains victory at court he still won't join an association or union :lol:

_________________
Note to self: Just because it pops into my head does NOT mean it should come out of my mouth!!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Jul 31, 2013 6:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 24, 2007 6:31 pm
Posts: 12045
Location: Aberdeen
Sussex wrote:
Mr TT does make a good point in his own interesting way.

I would bet a pound to a penny that if Mr Madder was in a union he wouldn't be currently under threat of a 6 month ban. (and no not a 12 month one instead) 8-[


Are you saying that his council shafted him, basically because they could?

_________________
Image
http://wingsoverscotland.com/ http://www.newsnetscotland.com/
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 61 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 183 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group