roythebus wrote:
what I believe was a county court case where a ph driver was taken to court because he charged the dead mileage to a remote pick-up; the passenger refused to pay the dead mileage, it went to court and the court found in the driver's favour, saying that a ph was entitled to charge for dead mileage.
I'm currently in dispute with Kent County Council refusing to accept that dead mileage is not part of the "home to school" contract, the clue being in the words!
As PH you can charge what you want....That's why When we Price school Contract Tenders we factor that into the Price, as a rule of thumb you enter Double the price of the Actual Pupils Travelled mileage and that covers dead return Mileage at the same price as live milage. Thats where a Framework price backfires, it removes your ability to tender for Individual runs on their own merits and price accordingly. It's a one size does all approach to pricing that don't work so good. Eventually many runs end up as Mini Tenders and get priced outside the Framework Tender price, but that's after nobody would want them as they wouldn't generate a profit.
One Contractor up here Didn't twig that and they ended up doing the Runs for Half their true worth then tried to argue they couldn't afford to continue doing so....It fecked it up for everybody else as these clowns got most of the best contracts as their price seemed to good to be true....and that's because it was.
How that would work for a Hack I don't know...as they should work to meter prices, so in doing so if they Priced hire than a Meter price for A contract tender to allow for dead mileage then I guess they could be breaching some rule or another...
