Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 9:20 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Oct 18, 2013 9:50 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Councils braced for fall-out of licence fee rulings


Councils are braced for a significant financial fall-out following two recent licensing rulings, local government lawyers have warned.

In Hemming and Others v Westminster City Council a sex shop chain in Soho won a case against licence fee charges in Westminster.

The decision followed the collapse earlier this year of Aylesbury Vale District Council’s prosecution of taxi firm Call a Cab for allegedly operating without a licence. Call a Cab denied the offence, claiming that it does not require a licence because it was not acting as an operator but as an intermediary on behalf of licensed operators. Aylesbury is appealing the decision to the High Court.

Nicola Hartley, licensing and litigation lead at representative body Lawyers in Local Government (LLG), said many councils expect to be significantly affected by both cases.

Hartley, who is also a solicitor at South Lakeland District Council, is calling for central government to clarify the statutory requirements for setting local government licence fees.

Frank Suadwa, development and regulatory law team leader at City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council, said: ‘Given the context of shrinking budgets and resources, [the Hemming] case will inevitably affect the ability of licensing authorities’ enforcement initiatives in their licensing areas.’

Hartley said South Lakeland District Council and other local authorities have received freedom of information requests asking for proof they have adopted the correct licensing legislation for taxi firms.

‘Aylesbury has significant financial implications for all councils for example, if a taxi operator was to allege that the correct legal procedures were not in place, councils could be faced with a demand for a refund of allegedly unlawful licensing fees going back over many years.

‘Councils will have adopted the relevant legislation but the difficulty comes in proving this when many councils destroy records after so many years.’

The Local Government Association will shortly publish guidance on what can be included in locally set licence fees.

source: http://www.lawgazette.co.uk/law/council ... 40.article

letter to LGA members:

http://www.local.gov.uk/c/document_libr ... upId=10180

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 3:31 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
Nicola Hartley, licensing and litigation lead at representative body Lawyers in Local Government (LLG), said many councils expect to be significantly affected by both cases.

Hartley, who is also a solicitor at South Lakeland District Council, is calling for central government to clarify the statutory requirements for setting local government licence fees.

That would be nice.

Maybe the gov could get someone like the Law Commission to investigate the taxi and PH trade. :roll: :roll: :roll:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 3:32 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
Hartley said South Lakeland District Council and other local authorities have received freedom of information requests asking for proof they have adopted the correct licensing legislation for taxi firms.

What people are actually asking the council if they are acting lawfully?

Heaven forbid. :roll: :roll: :roll:

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 3:34 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57350
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
The Local Government Association will shortly publish guidance on what can be included in locally set licence fees.

Only 166 year late for taxis and 37 years late for PH. ](*,)

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Oct 20, 2013 6:03 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 23, 2007 1:39 pm
Posts: 1582
Sussex wrote:
captain cab wrote:
Hartley said South Lakeland District Council and other local authorities have received freedom of information requests asking for proof they have adopted the correct licensing legislation for taxi firms.



I've been telling them that on here for months? Looks like some are listening :D


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 5 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 127 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group