Sussex wrote:
Socrates wrote:
Which still leaves us only two propositions thus far. Metropolitan vehicles are unpopular and taxi bosses are brave ...
Could you explain that please?
Certainly, my good man…
In asking “What makes for a successful taxi company that couldn’t be replicated by anyone else”, the first proposal came from our esteemed friend Skippy41. He suggested ‘slave labour’ but
by definition slave labour is in fact ‘forced’ labour and so far as we are aware nobody is ‘forced’ to work for successful taxi operations.
Trotskys Twin suggests in a manner of speaking that drivers may be slaves to their debts, rent, mortgage, bank loans etc but this is not the same as being slave to a taxi operation. Drivers have no choice where responsibility towards debt is concerned but they do get to choose how to pay such debts, whether or not that is via a taxi company and if so WHICH taxi company. The choice element proves Skippy41’s assertion of slave labour to be fundamentally flawed. Even if the choice is “TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT”, that is still a choice not enjoyed by slaves. Any further assertions that rely on the failed hypothesis of slave labour are therefore equally flawed.
It was later suggested by 187ums that “artificially low fares” could be the secret. Nidge2 thought not as this would attract only the low end of the market and Trotskys Twin also dealt 187ums’ proposition a further blow by pointing out that in the case of Addison Lee, cost is irrelevant to London customers. He says it isn’t cheap fares… it is “Newish motors that turn up on time and get you there”. Given that any company could replicate turning up on time and getting you there we must discard both from our investigation… but newish motors? London regulations prohibit the HC trade from using the same “newish motors” that Addison Lee are able to operate. This therefore represents our first, as yet unrefuted, possible reason for success by a taxi company than cannot be replicated by rival operations in the same area.
Wannabeeahack then stated that most car owners are “scared of the unknown”… clearly not everyone possesses the same courage but those that do excel in this area can go on to run a successful taxi operation. He gives us our second proposal yet to be refuted… taxi owners are braver than their drivers.
Roythebus next offers empirical evidence of groups of HC drivers failing to expand their organisation due to not having the necessary business acumen or not being sufficiently motivated. Let us add these to our list…
1. Successful taxi companies operate modern comfortable vehicles
2. Taxi bosses are braver than drivers
3. Taxi bosses have better business acumen than drivers
4. Taxi bosses are more motivated
These suggestions are solely the work of Trotskys Twin, Wannabeeahack and Roythebus. Does anyone refute their suggestions or offer any other reasons for taxi success that cannot be replicated by anybody else?