Sussex wrote:
Socrates wrote:
Your explanation suggests that service providers who are geographically tied to sparsely populated areas may quite simply be doomed to a kind of subsistence
What you mean where there aren't bundles of punters you wont need bundles of taxi/ph?
Well I never.

Sussex, Sussex, Sussex, my dear boy... you're not thinking hard enough... Come on! Stretch that grey matter of yours! Get with the program, we've been talking about CRITICAL MASS.... Think of what that means!
In nature, fissile material has to be present in sufficient quantities before the magic of nuclear fission can be sustained. Only a fool would think that the relationship between the amount of fissile material and the phenomenon of sustained nuclear fission followed a perfectly straight line from zero all the way upwards. Below a certain tipping point of material density, nuclear fission IS NOT SUSTAINABLE ... it simply does not happen. It is only once we venture ABOVE that magical tipping point (the critical mass) that the nuclear sparks start to fly, and any subsequent increases in material density thereafter directly affects the number of sparks. Drop back down below the critical tipping point again and the sparks don't decline, they cease completely!
So, now let us apply the very same understanding to a critical mass in "punters". RoyTheBus and I were exploring the possibility of there being punter density tipping points, above which OPTIMISED FLEET EFFICIENCY could be sustained (leading to supposed £300 a day takings) but below which OPTIMISED FLEET EFFICIENCY could not. No matter what you do or how hard you try, if the punter density is below the tipping point, there's no sparks, you are doomed to low wages / subsistence driving.
Heading into higher density areas which have the potential for punter critical mass, maybe something wondrous is possible, if you get the fleet management just right, that gives some operators an extremely competitive edge...