sasha wrote:
cabbyman wrote:
Under The Consumer Rights (Payment Surcharges) Regulations 2012, a trader is entitled to recover the additional costs of processing a card transaction.
And a different piece of legislation states that a taxi can't charge more than the metered fare. So if someone pays by card which law takes precedent ?

My reading would be that if the Customer pays by card:
1.
If the Driver makes an additional charge with which to pay the bank charge later, that would be illegal as the total charged by the Driver would exceed the metered fare.2.
If the bank makes the total charge, including the Bank charge, and then pays the Driver the metered fare, that would be legal. The Customer is paying the Bank for the facility to pay by card and by using the facility the Customer is agreeing to that. This in fact is what happens.
Having said that, I think it important that the Customer is informed what the Bank charge is. If it were included on a Tariff as a percentage, every time the rate changed the Tariff would have to be amended. Unfortunately it is rarely a fixed amount. To obviate this, the tariff could have words to the effect:
"When Payment is made using methods attracting a Bank charge, the Driver must clearly state what those charges are and must provide a receipt clearly showing such charge if requested."
I honestly think all this could be so easy and we are tying ourselves up in knots when we do not need to do so.