Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Sun Apr 26, 2026 6:30 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 276 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 19  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
MR T wrote:


This is a taxi man....t.d.o. you are not.....mrT


Quite right, I'm a taxi driver :lol:

Which you aren't, by your own admission :D

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Sirius wrote:
But, and correct me if I am wrong , was there not some concern at the idea that London was to get an extra so many thousands of drivers/cabs, I read an article by some guy saying that there was no need or desire to have this state of affairs foisted upon them, at the behest of some Politician who might know very little about the trade other than the desire to have a Cab in a couple of seconds any time day or night.

But thats London , I know nothing about it, so they can make up their own minds how they run their trade and and as each part of the country has different needs and demands , so should they.


I don't get your point Sirius, the London trade don't want more drivers because it's not in their interest, many in the provincial trade want more drivers because that's in their interest.

As I said in M&R, both positions are born of self interest, but the latter is the more self-serving.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:40 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
captain cab wrote:
[If owner drivers have good weekends, they dont work the early part of the week, unfortunately customers still want taxis, but then, this is in their best interest aint it, so they should be grateful, for the service being worse.



I've never quite got this, why would they work at weekends if they could make as much or more in the early part of the week?

And then you're complaining that they are making jack in a shift?

Must be plenty of taxis around if they are earning so little.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:44 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Sirius wrote:
What happened to the Guy from sheffield, is he one of the ones now protesting?


Who knows, he could well be under the 'conspiracy against the public' thesis of Adam Smith, or the similar drawbridge mentality regarding taxi plates, as expounded by that other great thinker, Mr Derek Cummins :D

But that doesn't make it right, but if he is now protesting, it might make him something of a hypocrite, which hardly justifies the pro-quotas argument.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 7:48 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
Sirius wrote:
"But Paul Waterson, chief executive of the Scottish Licensed Trade Association, said: "While I don't want to comment on any individual cases, there's no doubt that Edinburgh already has a major problem with the over-provision of licensed premises.



Thanks for providing more evidence to support my use of Adam Smith's 'conspiracy against the public thesis', Mr Sirius.

What a larff!!

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 8:07 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
RealCabforce wrote:
JD wrote:
The Government said this in 2004.

Those authorities in England and Wales that wish to continue to restrict taxi licences will be required to undertake a review of their policy every three years, with published conclusions, and to justify the policy in their LTPs.

But the Sheriff in the Edinburgh case said this in 2005.

1. Guidelines issued by the Department of Transport to English local authorities recommend that a survey of demand should be carried out every three years.

Does anyone have a copy of the DFT guidlines that specificaly says "they recommend a survey of demand should be carried out every three years".

Or did the Sheriff get it wrong?

Regards

JD


I would think that a policy review would look at supply and demand as part of the process.

My Oxford English Dictionary defines 'survey' as 'a general view or consideration of something' so perhaps you are assuming something that isn't there? Remenber that the OFT report was not accepted in Scotland and we also have a different legal system.

I also think it realistic to accept that a person with formal legal training and experience, and who now sits on the bench, will be able to read and interprete legal jargon better than you and I. They are not perfect, but then neither are we.


What does the OFT report have to do with it? It made recommendations to the Government and devolved institutions, this had no legal status.

If you look at the documents from which JD quotes it's quite clear that by survey the sheriff meant rank observations etc, whereas the DfT 'review' quite clearly meant a wider process than a survey per se.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 8:13 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
JD wrote:
Yet another instance where a license application was determined without the insistance that a suitable vehicle be presented beforehand.

Minutes: Licensing Committee 11/06/1999

5 REQUEST TO TRANSFER TAXI LICENCE - PHILIP CAPALDI

A request had been received from Mr Philip Capaldi to transfer a taxi operator’s licence held by his deceased father to his own name. The applicant and his representative were heard and outlined the special circumstances which they felt would permit the Committee to grant the licence sought.

The Committee were reminded of their previous decision that they would normally regard the spouses, sons or daughters of a taxi licence holder who had died, or who intended to surrender their licence to the Council, as being in circumstances that could be regarded as special where they held a current taxi driver’s licence and did not already have a taxi operator’s licence. The Council Solicitor confirmed that Mr Capaldi held a taxi driver’s licence.

DECISION

Having taken into account the special circumstances outlined, to grant Mr Capaldi a taxi operator’s licence subject to the Council’s standard licensing conditions.

(References - Licensing Committee 17 October 1997 (Item 6); report by the Council Solicitor 11 June 1999, submitted.)


These references to 'transfers' are rubbish anyway - a license can't be transferred under the Scottish legislation.

What they mean is handing one in and granting another one.

The Task Group that considered licensing legislation said that licenses couldn't be trasnsferred and that there were good reasons for this.

And who was on the Group - Mr Miller, who was then an ECC solicitor, so they're saying one thing one minute, and another the next.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 8:29 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:03 pm
Posts: 280
TDO wrote:
Sirius wrote:
"But Paul Waterson, chief executive of the Scottish Licensed Trade Association, said: "While I don't want to comment on any individual cases, there's no doubt that Edinburgh already has a major problem with the over-provision of licensed premises.



Thanks for providing more evidence to support my use of Adam Smith's 'conspiracy against the public thesis', Mr Sirius.

What a larff!!



Why is it a "Larf" TDO, why is over provision, or prevention of? it seen as a conspiracy against the public, what about the ultimate in over provision, should Supermarkets be allowed to open up wherever they like!

Or are you saying that they are trying to limit the amount of licensed premises for some ulterior reason?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 8:53 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 7:35 pm
Posts: 173
Location: Dundee
Sirius wrote:
"But Paul Waterson, chief executive of the Scottish Licensed Trade Association, said: "While I don't want to comment on any individual cases, there's no doubt that Edinburgh already has a major problem with the over-provision of licensed premises.

"We would agree with what the police are saying about over-provision in this part of Edinburgh, but they're merely coming around to our way of thinking. We've been saying this for years."


Now theres a surprise. The SLTA are constantly moaning about pub numbers as is their man in Dundee, who wrote to the Tele here a few years ago to warn people not to get into the trade because it was so bad - in other words, we don't want the competition, just like the taxis.

Now they've latched on to this yob culture business and the police have swallowed it hook line and sinker.

A few years ago the SLTA wanted a 25 year moratorum on new licenses, and it wasnt about yob culture, it was them saying that Dublin has a better pub culture and it would be the same here if they were increasing restrictions like in Dublin. Problem was that Dublin was at that time dumping the restrictions on pubs.

Another one in Dundee just complained because they couldnt open all thier hours because they had no customers - in other words, the business was crap, but they wanted thecouncil to help them out.

If these people had there way we would all be running about in trabants or ladas (half the Dundee taxis were for a few years) or maybe still stuck with the original hackney carriage, horse drawn.

So if the police had there way and the number of pubs was reduced, what would happen -either the pubs would be more packed or people would have to queue or they would go to pubs in other areas, how would this stop the rammies?

Its just another case of the police blaming something else for their own arms folded approach to policing - wait until things kick off, dont' try to prevent it in the first place.

I think its an offence to sell booze to a drunk, but the pubs and clubs just please themselves, and the authorities just let them get on with it.
The Nicholson report a couple of years ago didnt even mention this, as a recall (I didn't read it all, but if someone else knows different, let me know).

Same with a couple of years ago when some councils started fixing minimum prices for booze - rather than taking them on, police and councils just suck up to them, and at the same time the Chancellor is keeping drink duty down in the budget.

P&K council said they had checked with the OFT and licensing law, and they were OK. Then it was challenged in Aberdeen, and the judges threw the book at it. I dont know much about licensing law, but I think thats first year law student stuff - they had no powers, they knew it, but they went ahead anyway and hoped no one would notice.

its easier to suck up to the licenesed trade than take them on, just like the taxis.

_________________
Dundee rocks. Almost.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 8:54 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu Nov 04, 2004 5:53 pm
Posts: 10381
TDO wrote:

And who was on the Group - Mr Miller, who was then an ECC solicitor, so they're saying one thing one minute, and another the next.


I think you might find Mr Miller still is a CEC solicitor.

Regards

Jd


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 9:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:03 pm
Posts: 280
The Dundonian wrote:
Sirius wrote:
"But Paul Waterson, chief executive of the Scottish Licensed Trade Association, said: "While I don't want to comment on any individual cases, there's no doubt that Edinburgh already has a major problem with the over-provision of licensed premises.

"We would agree with what the police are saying about over-provision in this part of Edinburgh, but they're merely coming around to our way of thinking. We've been saying this for years."


Now theres a surprise. The SLTA are constantly moaning about pub numbers as is their man in Dundee, who wrote to the Tele here a few years ago to warn people not to get into the trade because it was so bad - in other words, we don't want the competition, just like the taxis.

Now they've latched on to this yob culture business and the police have swallowed it hook line and sinker.

A few years ago the SLTA wanted a 25 year moratorum on new licenses, and it wasnt about yob culture, it was them saying that Dublin has a better pub culture and it would be the same here if they were increasing restrictions like in Dublin. Problem was that Dublin was at that time dumping the restrictions on pubs.

Another one in Dundee just complained because they couldnt open all thier hours because they had no customers - in other words, the business was crap, but they wanted thecouncil to help them out.

If these people had there way we would all be running about in trabants or ladas (half the Dundee taxis were for a few years) or maybe still stuck with the original hackney carriage, horse drawn.

So if the police had there way and the number of pubs was reduced, what would happen -either the pubs would be more packed or people would have to queue or they would go to pubs in other areas, how would this stop the rammies?

Its just another case of the police blaming something else for their own arms folded approach to policing - wait until things kick off, dont' try to prevent it in the first place.

I think its an offence to sell booze to a drunk, but the pubs and clubs just please themselves, and the authorities just let them get on with it.
The Nicholson report a couple of years ago didnt even mention this, as a recall (I didn't read it all, but if someone else knows different, let me know).

Same with a couple of years ago when some councils started fixing minimum prices for booze - rather than taking them on, police and councils just suck up to them, and at the same time the Chancellor is keeping drink duty down in the budget.

P&K council said they had checked with the OFT and licensing law, and they were OK. Then it was challenged in Aberdeen, and the judges threw the book at it. I dont know much about licensing law, but I think thats first year law student stuff - they had no powers, they knew it, but they went ahead anyway and hoped no one would notice.

its easier to suck up to the licenesed trade than take them on, just like the taxis.



Well I dont think they want to reduce the number of pubs, just concerned about the number opening in a given area, so do you think the local residents should not be allowed to voice an opinion on these issues.

Reminds me of a conversation I had with someone who voiced her disagreement that a woman who lived above a pizza outlet had complained about the time the outlet was intending to open to at night, the women said "well she must have known that when she moved in" I said " I dont know if they had Pizza outlets 50 years ago!, or Sunday opening".


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 9:28 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jun 03, 2005 12:03 pm
Posts: 280
Is this a conspiracy against the public , or an individual trying to protect her rights.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Aug 04, 2005 10:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 22, 2004 7:35 pm
Posts: 173
Location: Dundee
Good point about the pizzas and that, but that was nothing to do with the quotes from the article or what i said in my message, change the subject why dont you :wink:

Your point about the takeaway is more a planning thing than what I was on about, which was the pubs just wanting a monopoly and the police and councils just using it as an excuse for there incompetence.

_________________
Dundee rocks. Almost.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 1:11 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
TDO wrote:
Sirius wrote:
The other thing that I would be concerned about is those drivers that do not wish to purchase a vehicle and go through the new high quality! mind altering driver training, what happens there?

Would they be forced to puchase a vehicle of their own because there would not be so many people looking for someone to rent their Cab?


Well what happens in London and the majority of UK LAs at the present?

Is any taxi driver in the UK forced to buy a vehicle because they can't find someone to give them a shift?

actually youve made a valid point here.
lets hypothisise
you want to become a taxi driver :shock:

you get training for months or years in some cases,spending hundreds or even thousands and a great deal of time and effort .:sad:

you pass youre knowledge.:D

and look for work :sad:

but you cant get any.

only then do you find out that thier is an overprovision of drivers.


so you trot happily off to the council for youre plate .
lo and behold thiers a limit on the number of taxi's in youre area :shock:

despite the fact that drivers are crying out for thier own plate.despite the need for more licences.

so yes youre right in this case you would be forced to bye youre own taxi

unless of course you want to bid up rental prices to bye youreself a job?

but then again this is done for you by the plate owners already eusasmiles.zip eusasmiles.zip eusasmiles.zip


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Aug 05, 2005 1:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2005 12:54 am
Posts: 2372
Location: edinburgh
my point is whichever way you look at limiting taxi numers(and believe me ive looked up its arse)

thier is no good points about it its just wrong from top to bottom

as for what happpens at training centres, well prospective cabbies are reprogrammed into drones who live in fear of loosing thier licence (here in edinburgh anyway)who think they owe a living to the council, or worse another taxi driver who is lucky enough to have his own plate that he'll sell him not at the nominal fee that he paid,no but at an astronomical fee of 50k


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 276 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13 ... 19  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 811 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group