captain cab wrote:
Skull wrote:
No, it makes a difference because you are not hiring a cab from Uber but you are from City Cabs, CRT, etc. As they are registered as taxi companies and operate as such.
The customer merely uses the app technology to hire a taxi/Phc direct from the driver. The contract exists between the customer and the driver. Now while I agree that Uber might monitor the drivers to protect the use of their technology, it is not a taxi/ph company in the way that City or CRT is.
despite what uber may claim - because they are the operator the contract is with them.
Nope, I don't agree. They might well be going down this route in a bid to stop any resistance to their app but the technology does exactly the same job whether it is licensed or not.
The council is using the CGSA, to licence a phone technology platform that a driver might or might not use.
Think about it, Uber is promoting the Rideshare app as a means of hiring a taxi, they are not claiming to be a taxi company.
Quote:
Uber is evolving the way the world moves. By seamlessly connecting riders to drivers through our apps, we make cities more accessible, opening up more possibilities for riders and more business for drivers. From our founding in 2009 to our launches in over 200 cities today, Uber's rapidly expanding global presence continues to bring people and their cities closer.
Uber is an
App 