captain cab wrote:
Skull wrote:
Yeah but if Uber wants to keep moving the goalposts there is not a council in the country that could take them to court. Edinburgh council has a huge black hole in its finances as it is, so they are not about to fight Uber through the courts for a bunch of cabbies and as for the Scottish Government, they will compromise on how the current legislation is applied. It will be, you scratch my back...

all UBER have done is apply - as they should for a PH operators license from Edinburgh Council isn't it?
If that's right, it hardly suggests they will suddenly change tact and look down different avenues.
The UK cab trade should be thankful we have a two tier system that cover the likes of UBER - many other countries don't.
I really don't see how the current legislation applies to a technology platform. I know it is being used but really, an app on your phone that puts the customer in contact with the driver and a billing facility for the service provided.

Speaking hypothetically, why should Uber care who signs up for their technology, it's not up to them to regulate the drivers it's up to the council and the government.
Uber doesn't even have to be in the country for someone to download the app or to use its services.
I think Uber are playing ball because it suites them and not because they have to.
