MR T wrote:
grandad wrote:
Any advice welcome.
One of my drivers has a 12 year old son with downs syndrome. He is quite a bit overweight.
The family have a social worker appointed to them and this person is, in my opinion a bully whose sole intent is to have the child taken into care. He told the parents a few weeks ago that unless the child lost 3 stone in 12 weeks he would have him put on the at risk register. The parents are doing all that they can and to date he has lost 1 stone. However the parents were told to be at a meeting this afternoon with the social worker. and a couple of days ago he sent them a letter telling them that a case conference has been arranged for next Monday with a view to putting the child on the at risk register. before that meeting the social worker is required to produce a report and the parents are to receive a copy of this report. They thought that this was the purpose of todays meeting. So they have both taken time off work to attend this meeting for the social worker to tell them that he would put the report through their door on Friday evening.
I have suggested that they get a family solicitor involved but when they mentioned this to the social worker he advised them that it would not be a good idea and it would go against them. I don't think that it is a coincidence that the report will not be delivered until Friday evening and the case conference is on Monday leaving no time at all to show the report to a solicitor.
Grandad, I have been in a similar position as you find yourself. It is important to understand what is happening and how it works.
Social Services have been brought in by a third party, teachers at the school, nurses at the school or someone else. The social worker who has been given her case has a system to follow. He is taking his findings to a case conference which will consist of a chairperson, who will be there to look after the interests of the child and parents, and at the same time control the meeting. There will also be representatives from the child's school. both educational and medical, representatives from any other support groups she may be involved with, plus the parents. The reason for being placed on an 'at risk' register is so that they will automatically be informed if anyone within that group feels that there is something wrong, including the police.
Social services cannot place the child in care, that is up to a court, but their reports and case files would form the evidence for such a case. The Council has a duty to inform the parents at this stage that they have a right to a solicitor, due to the fact that the minutes of the meeting would be used against the parents. Your friend should certainly see a solicitor that specialises in this field. If she can't. for whatever reason, she needs to start a daily diary of everything that has happened up to now and a record of all conversations and advice given by SS and any documentation.
At the case conference, either herself or a friend, needs to take minutes of the meeting, and who was there, and have them signed by the Chair if possible. There will be someone there taking minutes of the meeting. She needs to ask the question whether any of the reports or minutes of that meeting would be used as evidence, if social services were to apply for custody of the child, and why she has been advised by the social worker not to see a solicitor, and make sure the question and answer is recorded in the minutes. As for the medical side of things, you have already been given good advice by other posters.
I hope this helps you and your friend.[/quot
this is excellent advice from Trev whose apparently been through similar attacks. i would add that this woman wont be in a suitable state of mind to take minutes and should demand the right of representation, to deliver a written report on a friday evening and have you answer to it in a time scale that denys her her right to consult advisers on the contents of that document is a BREACH OF PROCEDURE, there no way in those circumstances this meeting should proceed a 48hrs adjournment would be the minimum i would request shes being railroaded, and its always the same ADVICE never ever represent yourself!
Skulls point re video recording, i have no idea if that could be enforced yet again enforcing the need for legal advice.
She must be accompanied to this meeting by a friend solicitor employer anyone who can support her she will mess up on her own as would i you or anyone else in these circumstances .
I wish her luck.
_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity
I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT
http://www.republic.org.uF88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND
BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE