Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 8:42 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2015 10:17 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Clause 11

BARONESS THORNTON


Page 8, line 22, at end insert—

“(e) the person who made the booking has consented to their booking being sub-contracted to a second operator.

(1A) A licensing authority may exercise all its powers over a vehicle licensed as a private hire vehicle or taxi if it is operating in their area, even if the licence was issued by another licensing authority.”

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2015 4:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
grandad wrote:
Clause 11

BARONESS THORNTON


Page 8, line 22, at end insert—

“(e) the person who made the booking has consented to their booking being sub-contracted to a second operator.

(1A) A licensing authority may exercise all its powers over a vehicle licensed as a private hire vehicle or taxi if it is operating in their area, even if the licence was issued by another licensing authority.”


And your view on that Gramps :?:

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2015 5:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
trotskys twin wrote:
grandad wrote:
Clause 11

BARONESS THORNTON


Page 8, line 22, at end insert—

“(e) the person who made the booking has consented to their booking being sub-contracted to a second operator.

(1A) A licensing authority may exercise all its powers over a vehicle licensed as a private hire vehicle or taxi if it is operating in their area, even if the licence was issued by another licensing authority.”


And your view on that Gramps :?:

I have no problem with it whatsoever. I think the second part should have been included from the start.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Jan 30, 2015 10:28 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
trotskys twin wrote:
grandad wrote:
Clause 11

BARONESS THORNTON


Page 8, line 22, at end insert—

“(e) the person who made the booking has consented to their booking being sub-contracted to a second operator.

(1A) A licensing authority may exercise all its powers over a vehicle licensed as a private hire vehicle or taxi if it is operating in their area, even if the licence was issued by another licensing authority.”


And your view on that Gramps :?:

Spivs wont be happy.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 11:23 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
grandad wrote:
Clause 11

BARONESS THORNTON


Page 8, line 22, at end insert—

“(e) the person who made the booking has consented to their booking being sub-contracted to a second operator.

(1A) A licensing authority may exercise all its powers over a vehicle licensed as a private hire vehicle or taxi if it is operating in their area, even if the licence was issued by another licensing authority.”

Amendment defeated!

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 11:08 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 11:17 pm
Posts: 2712
Spivs happy then! :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 8:45 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
http://www.publications.parliament.uk/p ... 0349000290

The part of interest starts at 4.38pm

The concise version is as follows – the amendments failed.

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 9:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
Baroness Kramer: Let me move on to exactly that issue because it refers to the first part of Amendment 4. We looked at this very seriously because consent is attractive. First, we looked at the existing situation. As I said, subcontracting across districts in London has been going on for a decade. We have never heard—and we genuinely asked around as much as we could—of anyone complaining that a car came to get them which was not from the firm that they called. You call the Yellow cab company in your area, and a cab from Sun arrives to pick you up. We have never found any complaints that people were not asked for their consent before that happened. So the question arises: is there a problem? Again, within individual districts, subcontracting has been permitted for as long as anyone can remember. We have not had any complaints and cannot find anybody saying “I wasn’t asked before the subcontracting happened within this licensing district”.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 9:59 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
grandad wrote:
Baroness Kramer: Let me move on to exactly that issue because it refers to the first part of Amendment 4. We looked at this very seriously because consent is attractive. First, we looked at the existing situation. As I said, subcontracting across districts in London has been going on for a decade. We have never heard—and we genuinely asked around as much as we could—of anyone complaining that a car came to get them which was not from the firm that they called. You call the Yellow cab company in your area, and a cab from Sun arrives to pick you up. We have never found any complaints that people were not asked for their consent before that happened. So the question arises: is there a problem? Again, within individual districts, subcontracting has been permitted for as long as anyone can remember. We have not had any complaints and cannot find anybody saying “I wasn’t asked before the subcontracting happened within this licensing district”.


True - except for the fact all the vehicles used are effectively from the area licensed by the same licensing authority - TfL

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 9:58 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sat Aug 04, 2012 11:17 pm
Posts: 2712
But with standard testing and licencing conditions across the country, what will the problem be? We're back to the "don't trust the next council's testing regime" scenario.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 05, 2015 9:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
roythebus wrote:
But with standard testing and licencing conditions across the country, what will the problem be? We're back to the "don't trust the next council's testing regime" scenario.

I think part of the issue is we don't have universal standards before we are going to have universal fleets.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 343 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group