Tip too UBER investigate the GMBPDB's Branch sec company his employment practices and particularly his working hours, this will most certainly in my opinion prove very worthwhile to YOU
I believe an agreement between the Drivers and Uber could be negotiated to each party's satsifaction, my advice go for it.[/quote][/i][/i]
@Trotsky's Twin ---
You seem to be suggesting that the worker rights challenge fronted by Uber drivers might cause the GMB branch Secretary's own business some grief. So what? I think its a sign of integrity, in clearly setting aside a potential personal cost, to represent worker member needs. And it his responsibility to do so. If he were not prepared to do so you might have grounds to complain.
Also, I'm confused why you are looking to undermine the case by inviting the Uber corporations to investigate the Branch Sec? Even if there was something to find here, what would the cost of that be to the workers trying to secure their rights?
Also you rightly acknowledge that a win would be good for workers throughout the whole PH trade. I agree, it would potentially shape a much better model of worker / employment engagement than drivers currently have. Why then would you suggest drivers seek an earlier private settlement with Uber?. Surely we need this case to be heard as a test case for all ?
There maybe other agendas here but we need to do what is right for drivers and leave other issues aside.
Im confused.[/quote]
Your confused
clearly yer thick as well
A Branch sec HAS to follow the directions of his Branch or RESIGN hardly rocket science is it
As for investigating his activities
why not if he's whiter than white what has he to fear ?
If however he isnt
the resulting publicity will be of great use to the Branch for in dumping him they will destroy completely the belief that he is or could be using his position for personal gain ..............all publicity is good publicity
Your puerile belief that a legal case will establish for workers their rights is just stupid the Law in this Country will rarely assist workers and definitely not in this case!
Any Branch Sec of any credibility would be proposing INDUSTRIAL action AGAINST EXPLOITERS SOMETHING THAT MIGHT PROVE DIFFICULT FOR AN EXPLOITER ITSELF !
The best target for any industrial or legal action is of course as has been pointed out Addy Lee
or maybe a two bob outfit near Ruislip which operates outside the Working Time Directive in RESIDENTIAL premises without planning permission and in breach of all employment legislation regarding Self Employed Workers, Workers under the direction of the company or indeed PAYE regs evidently {take a look UBER
]
Your final point a separate deal with UBER ........surely its fekking obvious virtually all PH companys in London are despicable outfits they cheat and swindle their Drivers exploit them illegally and in general regard their staff as excretia ! So surely its obvious stoke up the battle between the established scum outfits and Uber by negotiating with Uber to your memberships advantage its called [DIVIDE AND RULE] any Trade Unionist with half a brain would have spotted this and got in their lively ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,evidently theres a shortage of such officers within the GMBPDB
[/quote]
UBER Driver London struck dumb
more like some gutless fat barsterrd afraid to reveal his ID TO$$ER
OR DUPLICITE ACTIVITIES
[/quote]
SO COME ON YOU FAT GOBBY GOBSHITE WHATS THE TRUTH ABOUT THIS FEKKING FARCE
OR YER BEEN RAIDED FOR RUNNING A BUSINESS FROM A RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY, WORKING EXCESSIVE HOURS
TAX BREACHES
_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity
I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT
http://www.republic.org.uF88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND
BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE
Login
Register
FAQ
