Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Tue Apr 28, 2026 2:30 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 169 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 10:56 pm 
:lol:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 10:59 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
That's what I like about you Mr T (or should I now call you T the first), is that you have the wonderful knack of ballsing up a thread. [-(

Why not try the preview button every now and again? [-o<

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 11:06 pm 
:lol:


Top
  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Thu Sep 08, 2005 11:18 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 11:19 am
Posts: 273
MR T wrote:
More taxis on the road = fewer fares per taxi = fare increase to maintain profit.

Exactly how are these extra cabs going to be driven? Is there a secret supply of licensed drivers out there? :?

Or will those extra cabs be driven by existing jockies? And if so how will that lead to less money being taken by anyone other than lazy non-working owners

Oh what the hell[/quote]

Existing jockies are either content being a jockey, don't want the hassel of running their own cab, or lack the finacial viability to buy their own plate. Free plates will attract freeloaders, people lacking any real commitment to the job, put in the minimum and take out the maximum. They will undercut, bend the rules, minimum maintenance etc,etc.
There will be plenty of takers especially in the short term, look at bus dereg, do you think that has worked. Owners may be lazy but at least they put their money up. Do you feel the same about shareholders in public companies. Money is the lubrication of business, dont shoo it away by making the taxi trade a poor investment.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 7:12 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
T. wrote:
Existing jockies are either content being a jockey, don't want the hassel of running their own cab, or lack the finacial viability to buy their own plate. Free plates will attract freeloaders, people lacking any real commitment to the job, put in the minimum and take out the maximum. They will undercut, bend the rules, minimum maintenance etc,etc.

I think you will find that's what you have at the moment.

As for jockies not being able to buy a plate, exactly, which is why we should do away with plate premiums.

A touch of treating everyone the same wouldn't go amiss in this trade.

You point about standards is also flawed, if someone has to buy a plate for up to £50,000, then that's £50,000 less he has to spend on standards.

Which is why most of the councils that have de-limited in the last couple of years have done so but have put in place quality standards.

But if you have come across a de-limited area that does have poor standards, that's evidence of poor and weak LOs, nothing else.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 7:14 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
T. wrote:
Owners may be lazy but at least they put their money up.

Drug dealers invest in more poppy fields, but that doesn't make it right.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 7:43 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 11:19 am
Posts: 273
Sussex wrote:
T. wrote:
Owners may be lazy but at least they put their money up.

Drug dealers invest in more poppy fields, but that doesn't make it right.



This is the most moronic comparision yet. Pathetic and childish !!!!!!!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 7:56 am 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 11:19 am
Posts: 273
Sussex wrote:
T. wrote:
Existing jockies are either content being a jockey, don't want the hassel of running their own cab, or lack the finacial viability to buy their own plate. Free plates will attract freeloaders, people lacking any real commitment to the job, put in the minimum and take out the maximum. They will undercut, bend the rules, minimum maintenance etc,etc.

I think you will find that's what you have at the moment.

As for jockies not being able to buy a plate, exactly, which is why we should do away with plate premiums.



A touch of treating everyone the same wouldn't go amiss in this trade.

A: Everyone is treated the same, your choice whether to buy or not.

You point about standards is also flawed, if someone has to buy a plate for up to £50,000, then that's £50,000 less he has to spend on standards.

A: No-one will invest anything unless there is a reasonable chance of a return on their investment. Anything you get for nothing is worthy exactly what you paid for it !

Which is why most of the councils that have de-limited in the last couple of years have done so but have put in place quality standards.
A: Quality standards are being used to control plate numbers following pressure from the trade.

But if you have come across a de-limited area that does have poor standards, that's evidence of poor and weak LOs, nothing else.


A: No its evidence of poor weak and stupid people running taxis, that would never be in business if it were not a freebie


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 5:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57343
Location: 1066 Country
Rather than even try an attempt of deciphering that post, I will say that I agree with half of it i.e. the bits I wrote.

And I disagree with the other half i.e. the bits T the second wrote. [-(

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:17 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
T. wrote:
I was making a point about business in general, are you suggesting that in all those areas its one man one plate, that everyone operates on an individual basis, no-one has joined a radio circuit.


I think the problem with your type of argument is the sweeping and simplisitic generalisations that you make.

No one ever suggested that in unrestricted areas it's one man one plate, or that none have joined a circuit.

And most circuits I know don't operate the plates anyway, so one man one plate is hardly incompatible with circuits.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:19 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
T. wrote:
Existing jockies are either content being a jockey, don't want the hassel of running their own cab, or lack the finacial viability to buy their own plate. Free plates will attract freeloaders, people lacking any real commitment to the job, put in the minimum and take out the maximum. They will undercut, bend the rules, minimum maintenance etc,etc.
There will be plenty of takers especially in the short term, look at bus dereg, do you think that has worked.


So why do people think the London black cab trade is so good, or is that what you are describing?

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:30 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
MR T wrote:
SUSSEX....Ask the tax man about GOODWILL ALLOWANCE when somebody sells a plate,, oops sorry I forgot you do not pay tax....mrT.. :roll:


In Royden the judge referred to the use of the term goodwill by the Inland Revenue, but then went on to say:

However, unlike the normal case of "goodwill" as a business asset, this 'premium' does not arise out of the fact that Mr Royden has built up a reputation or has an established clientele, as might be the case of a business such as a restaurant. The 'premium' arises simply because of the restriction on the number of hackney carriages authorised to ply for hire in the Wirral area. In other words, it is simply the reflection of the value of the local monopoly enjoyed by the existing hackney carriage proprietors and drivers. Presumably, the transferee's willingness to pay such a premium results from his estimation of the future profits he hopes to be able to make from the business thus protected.

Thus while the IR may use the term, it's just a description and has no real basis in relation to commercial realities, the IR just use it for capital gains tax purposes, its description is meaningless.

It's amazing that people like T. seem to think they know so much about business, but what they are clearly talking about is more of a cartel than a proper business, and also perhaps explains why the don't know the proper meaing of goodwill.

A more accurate term is 'excess profits'. :D

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:33 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 20, 2004 9:51 pm
Posts: 5795
Location: The Internet
T. wrote:
Money is the lubrication of business, dont shoo it away by making the taxi trade a poor investment.


Take a look around you at the real business world T., and you'll see that you don't need a closed market to invest.

_________________
Taxi Driver Online
www.taxi-driver.co.uk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Sep 09, 2005 6:40 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Apr 08, 2005 6:17 pm
Posts: 189
Location: liverpool
No wonder jockeys lack finacial viability, when there carring some greedy lazy prat on there backs . Jockeys they should be called horses . There are free loaders in the taxi business . Its not the driver . There are plenty of takers , in the taxi business . Its not the driver . There are the greedy fleet owners, who cheat , put the minimum in take out the maximum . even think there better than ever one else . Lots dont even drive . Who are you . call your self a driver i dont think so Streetcar.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sat Sep 10, 2005 9:43 pm 
Offline

Joined: Wed Sep 07, 2005 11:19 am
Posts: 273
TDO wrote:
T. wrote:
Money is the lubrication of business, dont shoo it away by making the taxi trade a poor investment.


Take a look around you at the real business world T., and you'll see that you don't need a closed market to invest.


So now you are saying the taxi trade is a sound investment?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 169 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1 ... 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 903 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group