Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Mon Apr 27, 2026 4:58 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 4:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Press watchdog reprimands Daily Telegraph over ‘misleading’ Corbyn anti-Semitism claims


The Daily Telegraph has been reprimanded by the Independent Press Standards Organization (IPSO) for making “significantly misleading” claims ‘without qualification’ about Labour MPs accusing party leader Jeremy Corbyn of being anti-Semitic.

IPSO upheld a complaint by shadow Northern Ireland Secretary Ivan Lewis regarding an article published on August 15 under the headline “Labour grandees round on ‘anti-Semite’ Corbyn’.”

The piece claimed Lewis has attacked Corbyn over his “anti-Semitic rhetoric” – a claim he denies.

The Telegraph piece cited an article Lewis wrote for the Labour List website in which he said Corbyn had “very poor judgment in expressing support for and failing to speak out against people who have engaged not in legitimate criticism of Israeli governments but in anti-Semitic rhetoric.

“It saddens me to have to say to some on the left of British politics that anti-racism means zero tolerance of anti-Semitism, no ifs, and no buts. I have said the same about Islamophobia and other forms of racism to a minority of my constituents who make unacceptable statements.”

Lewis said these comment had been misinterpreted by the Telegraph and that he had not claimed Corbyn is an anti-Semite.

The paper argued during the IPSO proceedings that its headline should not been seen separately from the main article, which carried the main quotes, and offered to carry a statement in the paper explaining this. Lewis turned down the offer and the paper has since amended the headline and the article.

IPSO found the piece had “prominently and without qualification” suggested Corbyn is “anti-Semitic” and that “the coverage was therefore significantly misleading.”

“This misleading impression was not remedied by the quotation of the [full] remarks elsewhere in the article. The newspaper had distorted [Lewis’s] comment on this issue,” it ruled.

IPSO ordered the Telegraph to publish an online amendment and to include a “front-page reference” in the print edition because that was where the allegation first appeared.

source: https://www.rt.com/uk/317791-daily-tele ... tsemitism/

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 7:51 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
captain cab wrote:
Press watchdog reprimands Daily Telegraph over ‘misleading’ Corbyn anti-Semitism claims


The Daily Telegraph has been reprimanded by the Independent Press Standards Organization (IPSO) for making “significantly misleading” claims ‘without qualification’ about Labour MPs accusing party leader Jeremy Corbyn of being anti-Semitic.

IPSO upheld a complaint by shadow Northern Ireland Secretary Ivan Lewis regarding an article published on August 15 under the headline “Labour grandees round on ‘anti-Semite’ Corbyn’.”

The piece claimed Lewis has attacked Corbyn over his “anti-Semitic rhetoric” – a claim he denies.

The Telegraph piece cited an article Lewis wrote for the Labour List website in which he said Corbyn had “very poor judgment in expressing support for and failing to speak out against people who have engaged not in legitimate criticism of Israeli governments but in anti-Semitic rhetoric.

“It saddens me to have to say to some on the left of British politics that anti-racism means zero tolerance of anti-Semitism, no ifs, and no buts. I have said the same about Islamophobia and other forms of racism to a minority of my constituents who make unacceptable statements.”

Lewis said these comment had been misinterpreted by the Telegraph and that he had not claimed Corbyn is an anti-Semite.

The paper argued during the IPSO proceedings that its headline should not been seen separately from the main article, which carried the main quotes, and offered to carry a statement in the paper explaining this. Lewis turned down the offer and the paper has since amended the headline and the article.

IPSO found the piece had “prominently and without qualification” suggested Corbyn is “anti-Semitic” and that “the coverage was therefore significantly misleading.”

“This misleading impression was not remedied by the quotation of the [full] remarks elsewhere in the article. The newspaper had distorted [Lewis’s] comment on this issue,” it ruled.

IPSO ordered the Telegraph to publish an online amendment and to include a “front-page reference” in the print edition because that was where the allegation first appeared.

source: https://www.rt.com/uk/317791-daily-tele ... tsemitism/


Aah the old smelly graph when j worked there we stopped loads of sh!t being printed and would have stopped this sh!t too, ironically saving THE SMELLY A BOLLOXXING :badgrin: :badgrin:

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 7:05 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
trotskys twin wrote:
when j worked there we stopped loads of sh!t being printed and would have stopped this sh!t too,

So much for press freedom then. If it didn't suit the unions it didn't get printed.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 8:34 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 8:15 pm
Posts: 9170
grandad wrote:
trotskys twin wrote:
when j worked there we stopped loads of sh!t being printed and would have stopped this sh!t too,

So much for press freedom then. If it didn't suit the unions it didn't get printed.


Forget him Grandad, him and his Ilk are the destroyers of Industry...well, more Pocket Prattleships really.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 11:21 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
grandad wrote:
trotskys twin wrote:
when j worked there we stopped loads of sh!t being printed and would have stopped this sh!t too,

So much for press freedom then. If it didn't suit the unions it didn't get printed.


Ahh the Tory kkunt has emerged from its shell then still hiding over Tory's murdering people by removing their benefits contrary to medical advice :evil: :evil: thought of an answer yet to$$er???????????

As for what was printed naturally if it wasnt true we, I, would stop it being printed and although Lord Deedes the editor at the time used to get irritated somewhat on several occassions he was grateful for our inside knowledge on some issues particularly during the miners dispute,.............................our inteference was limited of course to so called factual storys naturally the papers opinions were not interfered with by us! but on occasion we would obtain the right of reply on some issues .....................Deedes was quite receptive to many of our views !!

He really lost it on one occasion when we stated "this is the sort of journalism we would expect on the SUN" he summoned thejlourno to meet us and joined in with us in coating said half wit journo.

It does pay Tory kkunt to have some knowledge when pontificating making snide comments .........................yer an obscenity ](*,)

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 11:24 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
bloodnock wrote:
grandad wrote:
trotskys twin wrote:
when j worked there we stopped loads of sh!t being printed and would have stopped this sh!t too,

So much for press freedom then. If it didn't suit the unions it didn't get printed.


Forget him Grandad, him and his Ilk are the destroyers of Industry...well, more Pocket Prattleships really.


spoken like a true ORANGE PILLOCK :badgrin: :badgrin:

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 66 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group