Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Thu Apr 30, 2026 1:49 pm

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Oct 07, 2015 12:21 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Minicab driver fined £525 for operating illegally during Cheltenham's Gold Cup week

Minicab drivers have been warned to comply with the law during race week in Cheltenham.

A minicab driver operating illegally during Cheltenham's Gold Cup week has been fined £525 in court.

The borough council prosecuted private hire driver Alderito Queiros Balde for unlawfully plying his trade in the borough.

In March this year, during the town's National Hunt Festival, officers from both Cheltenham Borough Council and Gloucester City Council were working in partnership to monitor the licensable activities in the borough.

Gloucester licensed private hire driver Balde was seen by enforcement officers unlawfully picking up customers.

Whilst waiting to pick up customers who had pre-booked a journey, Balde was approached by another group of people who asked him to take them to Swindon.

He initially refused, stating that he was waiting for a pre-booked fare but later agreed to take them to Cheltenham Spa railway station where they could catch a train to Swindon.

At this point, licensing enforcement officers approached Balde's vehicle and informed him that he should not be accepting the journey because it was not booked in advance and that by doing so he may be committing an offence.

Despite the warning, Balde did not ask these customers to exit the vehicle.

He was summoned to appear at Cheltenham Magistrates' Court for offences committed under the Local Government (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1976 and Town Police Clause Act 1847.

Balde was found guilty of all offences listed and was fined a total of £525 - £250 for the offences, £250 costs and £25 victim surcharge.

When sentencing, magistrates took into account Balde's guilty plea, the avoidance of a trial and his mitigation.

Councillor Andy McKinlay, the council's cabinet member for development and safety, said: "Unlicensed drivers and vehicles unlawfully plying their trade in the borough puts public safety at risk but also undermines the legitimate licensed trade, especially during a very busy period for them such as the Cheltenham Gold Cup week.

"This prosecution should send a message that drivers and vehicles not properly licensed are not welcome in Cheltenham."

Sarah Hughes, the council's licensing enforcement officer, said: "This prosecution highlights the success of partnership working with our colleagues from other local authorities. It also gives a warning to drivers who wish to capitalise on the additional footfall to Cheltenham during Gold Cup week that we will take action should they operate unlawfully.

"This is just another example of a driver being prosecuted by the council for operating unlawfully during Cheltenham Gold Cup week and as a result we will continue to put additional staff on the streets during major races to monitor such activity.

"The council is currently prosecuting another driver for similar offences and we will continue to enforce licensing law where there is sufficient evidence to support formal action."


Read more: http://www.gloucestershireecho.co.uk/Ta ... z3nscbSbN6

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 15, 2015 8:43 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
Despite the warning, Balde did not ask these customers to exit the vehicle.

Thick as pigs s***.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 4:06 pm 
Offline

Joined: Fri Jan 02, 2015 2:10 pm
Posts: 3
Doh! Why on earth would he have allowed them to remain in the vehicle?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 4:56 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
NO MENTION FROM THE SCUM ON THE BENCH THAT THIS BERK WAS DRIVING UNINSURED AND THEREFORE SHOULD HAVE BEEN BANNED FROM DRIVING, AND WHEN IS HIS LA GOING TO REMOVE THE ASSOLES PH LICENSE ????????????????


THE WORLDS RUN BY KKKUNTS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 9:11 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
trotskys twin wrote:
NO MENTION FROM THE SCUM ON THE BENCH THAT THIS BERK WAS DRIVING UNINSURED AND THEREFORE SHOULD HAVE BEEN BANNED FROM DRIVING,

And there was me thinking no insurance was a fixed penalty fine.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Nov 04, 2015 10:01 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20858
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
I think that's 8 points to CC

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 5:02 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 23, 2012 7:24 pm
Posts: 6755
Sussex wrote:
trotskys twin wrote:
NO MENTION FROM THE SCUM ON THE BENCH THAT THIS BERK WAS DRIVING UNINSURED AND THEREFORE SHOULD HAVE BEEN BANNED FROM DRIVING,

And there was me thinking no insurance was a fixed penalty fine.


for a cab driver yer honour?

_________________
All posts by this contributor are made in a strictly personal capacity

I AM PROUD TO BE A CITIZEN NOBODY'S SUBJECT http://www.republic.org.u

F88K EM ALL WHAT GOES AROUND COMES AROUND

BOOZE BOOZE BOOZE


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 5:58 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Sat Apr 01, 2006 11:47 pm
Posts: 20858
Location: Stamford Britains prettiest town till SKDC ruined it
Sussex wrote:
trotskys twin wrote:
NO MENTION FROM THE SCUM ON THE BENCH THAT THIS BERK WAS DRIVING UNINSURED AND THEREFORE SHOULD HAVE BEEN BANNED FROM DRIVING,

And there was me thinking no insurance was a fixed penalty fine.


and points on his license I suppose if he already had points there might be a totting up ban

_________________
lack of modern legislation is the iceberg sinking the titanic of the transport sector


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 05, 2015 10:29 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57349
Location: 1066 Country
edders23 wrote:
Sussex wrote:
trotskys twin wrote:
NO MENTION FROM THE SCUM ON THE BENCH THAT THIS BERK WAS DRIVING UNINSURED AND THEREFORE SHOULD HAVE BEEN BANNED FROM DRIVING,

And there was me thinking no insurance was a fixed penalty fine.


and points on his license I suppose if he already had points there might be a totting up ban

This prosecution was brought by the council, no points can be put on a DVLA license via a council prosecution.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 301 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group