Taxi Driver Online

UK cab trade debate and advice
It is currently Mon May 04, 2026 12:39 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:03 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Rules to ensure taxis are safe need to be tightened up, says boss of Keighley firm


BRADFORD Council's existing regime for ensuring taxi vehicle safety is not tough enough, according to a Keighley private hire firm boss.

Stuart Hastings, who owns Metro Keighley Taxis, says far too many private hire cars are failing inspections.

"People want to know they are getting into a safe car with a safe driver," he said. "Right now, they are not getting that. There is too big a risk that the car they get into is dangerous."

But a Bradford Council spokesman rejected the claim, arguing the present system is up to scratch.

"It is not correct to say Bradford Council's taxi inspection system is putting customers’ lives at risk," he said.

"We are confident the vehicle inspection system achieves its purpose of making sure taxi customers are as safe as possible."

Mr Hastings said a meeting he attended with council officers from Bradford’s Hackney Carriage licensing department heard that 40 per cent of private hire vehicles in Bradford district are failing safety checks, with 20 per cent having dangerous faults, such as bald tires.

Mr Hastings said the Hackney Carriage department officers are doing their best, but need more staff and political backing from councillors.

"Under the old system, taxis less than five years old had to be inspected once a year and taxis five to eight years old twice a year," he added.

"This was relaxed a few years ago, meaning taxis up to ten years old only need to be checked once a year. We need the original system brought back.

"Also, drivers whose cars fail the vehicle safety test first time only have to pay a small sum of £20 for the second test. They should instead have to pay the full test fee of about £160 again. If that happened, you'd see the 40 per cent failure rate drop to nearly zero."

But the council spokesman added: “The majority of vehicles failing inspections do so because of minor infringements of the rules, not major safety concerns, which would put customers in danger.

“We accept a 40 per cent inspection failure rate is disappointing, and our taxi licensing service is working with operators and drivers to try and improve the figures.

"We are confident Bradford taxis compare favourably with those from other local authorities, and will continue to do so in the future."

Mr Hastings has previously spoken out against private hire cars in Keighley and Bradford district holding licences from the Lancashire borough of Rossendale, where driver and vehicle checks are said to be less stringent.

Bradford Council now says it will impose more rules on cab companies that employ drivers with non-Bradford licences.

Under these plans, minicab firms would be forced to install separate customer phone lines for the cabbies licensed by other areas.

People calling this number would hear a recorded message warning them the drivers did not hold Bradford licenses, so Bradford Council couldn't act on any complaints about the service.

source: http://www.keighleynews.co.uk/news/1430 ... hley_firm/

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 11:05 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 7:25 pm
Posts: 37494
Location: Wayneistan
Quote:
Under these plans, minicab firms would be forced to install separate customer phone lines for the cabbies licensed by other areas.

People calling this number would hear a recorded message warning them the drivers did not hold Bradford licenses, so Bradford Council couldn't act on any complaints about the service.


I wonder how long until the legality of this is tested in court?

Indeed, I wonder how it works with Uber?

_________________
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that.
George Carlin


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 2:42 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2553
This is back to what was deregulated with regards to private hire operators.

Subcontracting is only to another private hire operator.

A private hire operator is only licensed to take a booking for a private hire vehicle.

Read what is said in relation to a private hire operator in the 1976 Act and then read what is said in the 2015 Deregulation Act.

One has to conclude the Council is correct in trying to enforce this but is being over cautious in doing so,wish the councillors and officers in my district had the bottle to do the same.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 2:47 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
heathcote wrote:

A private hire operator is only licensed to take a booking for a private hire vehicle.


I disagree.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 3:22 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2553
Grandad elaborate on your view.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 3:25 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
When i ran a mixed fleet i could take bookings for private Hire and Hackney.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 3:35 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2553
How did you differentiate the booking for a private hire vehicle from a booking for a TAXI not forgetting a TAXI is a TAXI 24/7.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 5:11 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
heathcote wrote:
How did you differentiate the booking for a private hire vehicle from a booking for a TAXI not forgetting a TAXI is a TAXI 24/7.

Is there a difference? A hackney can take pre booked work anywhere and so can a private Hire vehicle. The only difference is that the Hackney uses the meter for all jobs within the Borough and the Private hire runs on agreed fares, in our case based on what the meter would be for the same distance. The records kept by our data system are the same for each vehicle.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 5:34 pm 
Offline

Joined: Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:56 pm
Posts: 2553
The proposals are to combat out of town vehicles working full time in a borough where they are not licensed,on a private hire operators system licensed by a different authority to their own licensing authority.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 6:27 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Apr 03, 2007 11:27 pm
Posts: 20130
heathcote wrote:
The proposals are to combat out of town vehicles working full time in a borough where they are not licensed,on a private hire operators system licensed by a different authority to their own licensing authority.

You stated that a private hire operator can only take a booking for a private hire vehicle and you are wrong.

_________________
Grandad,


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Feb 26, 2016 7:10 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2003 7:30 pm
Posts: 57358
Location: 1066 Country
captain cab wrote:
Indeed, I wonder how it works with Uber?

Reverse bookings.

_________________
IDFIMH


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 919 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group